DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

1 GB 4870 vs 512MB 4870 (Palit- Dual Sonic)

6 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/1-gb-4870-vs-512mb-4870-palit-dual-sonic.112337/

asingh
asingh Original post #1
Apr 5, 2009 at 9:05 PM
Will the extra 512MB on the 1 GB 4870 Dual Sonic - Palit really make a difference.

Will the 1GB GPU give a FPS gain of >10 FPS..or less...relative to the 512MB card..??

The price difference is: ~Rs1,600 (as per itwarez website)

I use a 19" DELL Screen. Would want to play at the highest resolutions I can:1440 x 900.

Assume that this will be on a new motherboard and DDR2 RAM with a C2D. Not with reference to my signature.
The Sorcerer
Apr 5, 2009 at 9:56 PM
For a 19 inch stick to 512MB will do well assuming you have an equally good psu.
desiibond
Apr 6, 2009 at 10:29 AM
yes. go for the 1Gb model.

also check out Palit GTX 260 894MB SP216 DDR3 PCI With HDMI, which costs less than 1Gb HD4870
comp@ddict
Apr 6, 2009 at 8:22 PM
1440 x 900.
Options:-
1. Palit HD 4850 512MB GDDR3 SONIC @ 9.7k
2. Palit HD4850 512MB GDDR5 Speacial SONIC @ 10.3k
3. Palit HD4870 512MB GDDR5 Dual SONIC @ 13.3k

It makes complete sense to go for option no. 2, provided you have a good 450W PSU like Corsair VX450 or a 500W+ PSU of a good brand.
asingh
asingh #5
Apr 8, 2009 at 9:40 PM
Great..thanks to all.!
H
Apr 9, 2009 at 12:40 AM
i wud say stick to nvidia.get a GTX260 Core 216.
hav used both Palit HD4850 & HD4870 Sonic.the cards r gud but drivers from ATi aint that gud.hav moved over to nVidia again.