K
Hey ppl,
Help. A legal case here.
*www.i-doser.com has a software called IDoser (which was also given with Digit this month) which is a free software and you need to buy DRuG doses for use available at their store *www.i-doser.com/store at different prices. That DRuG file (*.drg) is simply a Base64 + RC4 decoded text which contains information about the DRuG, picture and the SBG file (Playable with SBaGen, an Open Source Program from which IDoser has been Derived).
Now, I opened the DRuG file in Notepad and saw Base64 in there (any child will guess printable multiline decoded text to be Base64). Then when I decoded (Base64) parts of the text in the DRuG file, I was cluless. Then when I looked at the disassembly of the IDoser player, I found some text reference before the decryption takes place. Then I searched for encryptors that support password protected encryption. And among many, one of them was RC4, a famous stream cypher. When I decrypted the resulting text with RC4 with the string reference as password, I was successful.
Then, me along with some of my friends decided to build an application that could create DRuG files, which are otherwise only available from the IDoser labs. Then, we downloaded open source algorithms for Base64 and RC4 decoding. Also we downloaded source of SBaGen for checking SBG files input by the user. Then built the software, and released it in various websites and forums (including IDoser forum at *www.i-doser.com/forum).
The source is available at request.
Recently a mail hits our inbox saying this:
Lets analyze this mail part by part:
Now, the name of our application is titled "_steAlth_'s DRG Author & Reconstructor" and contains no IDoser Brand name. Also, the documentation "FAQ.txt" in the package clearly mentions that we are not from "IDoser labs". And can it be illegal to create application that contains some other brand name. Is Alcohol 120% an illegal application because it contains several brand names such as "Securom" & "SafeDisk". And is it illegal to create files compatible with some other software??
Again, we are NOT using any of the code from their IDoser application. And using code from SBaGen is legal as its readme says it clearly:
We have also included the SBaGen.txt (containing above info) with our release.
And as it is GNU, IDoser labs should provide SourCode of the modified SBaGen source they use, which they don't so they seem to violate the law. As the GNU included with SBaGen clearly says:
However, we are ready to give the source of not only the modified SBaGen code we use, but also the whole program itself. As the GPL states:
So the source of IDoser should also be available for free. This may not be necessary as they only include s1.dll (the SBaGen library) so the exe may not be considered the part of it. But just in case.
And this:
Does this make any sense now??
And BTW, they have no mention of any Licence in the application or the website which says that DRuG files cannot be created or any software which can create or modify them cannot be created or released. They don't even have any licence agreement included anywhere except when you try to "activate" (aka Open) a DRuG file via their application. The agreement says the following:
Can we sue them instead for threatning us and any other charges? We won't but at least we will have a point when we reply to them.
Please help by responding to this post.
Help. A legal case here.
*www.i-doser.com has a software called IDoser (which was also given with Digit this month) which is a free software and you need to buy DRuG doses for use available at their store *www.i-doser.com/store at different prices. That DRuG file (*.drg) is simply a Base64 + RC4 decoded text which contains information about the DRuG, picture and the SBG file (Playable with SBaGen, an Open Source Program from which IDoser has been Derived).
Now, I opened the DRuG file in Notepad and saw Base64 in there (any child will guess printable multiline decoded text to be Base64). Then when I decoded (Base64) parts of the text in the DRuG file, I was cluless. Then when I looked at the disassembly of the IDoser player, I found some text reference before the decryption takes place. Then I searched for encryptors that support password protected encryption. And among many, one of them was RC4, a famous stream cypher. When I decrypted the resulting text with RC4 with the string reference as password, I was successful.
Then, me along with some of my friends decided to build an application that could create DRuG files, which are otherwise only available from the IDoser labs. Then, we downloaded open source algorithms for Base64 and RC4 decoding. Also we downloaded source of SBaGen for checking SBG files input by the user. Then built the software, and released it in various websites and forums (including IDoser forum at *www.i-doser.com/forum).
The source is available at request.
Recently a mail hits our inbox saying this:
Lets analyze this mail part by part:
Now, the name of our application is titled "_steAlth_'s DRG Author & Reconstructor" and contains no IDoser Brand name. Also, the documentation "FAQ.txt" in the package clearly mentions that we are not from "IDoser labs". And can it be illegal to create application that contains some other brand name. Is Alcohol 120% an illegal application because it contains several brand names such as "Securom" & "SafeDisk". And is it illegal to create files compatible with some other software??
Again, we are NOT using any of the code from their IDoser application. And using code from SBaGen is legal as its readme says it clearly:
We have also included the SBaGen.txt (containing above info) with our release.
And as it is GNU, IDoser labs should provide SourCode of the modified SBaGen source they use, which they don't so they seem to violate the law. As the GNU included with SBaGen clearly says:
However, we are ready to give the source of not only the modified SBaGen code we use, but also the whole program itself. As the GPL states:
So the source of IDoser should also be available for free. This may not be necessary as they only include s1.dll (the SBaGen library) so the exe may not be considered the part of it. But just in case.
And this:
Does this make any sense now??
And BTW, they have no mention of any Licence in the application or the website which says that DRuG files cannot be created or any software which can create or modify them cannot be created or released. They don't even have any licence agreement included anywhere except when you try to "activate" (aka Open) a DRuG file via their application. The agreement says the following:
Can we sue them instead for threatning us and any other charges? We won't but at least we will have a point when we reply to them.
Please help by responding to this post.