DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

aac 64KBPS Or mp3 128 KBPS VBR?

4 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/aac-64kbps-or-mp3-128-kbps-vbr.119731/

stonecaper
stonecaper Original post #1
Jul 27, 2009 at 10:24 AM
I just want to know if The quality would be same of a 64 kbps aac File or a 128 kbps VBR mp3 file for the same song.plz advise

p.s. I use Mediacoder to transcode my mp3 files to aac With nero encoder HE-AAc v2 [Quality 25%].any other better encoder settings or FREE software to transcode aac would be appreciated.
Thnx in advance
desiibond
Jul 27, 2009 at 10:46 AM
mp3 128kbps anyday!!!
kumarmohit
Jul 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM
Exactly mp3128kbps would be better, though if you want a freeware to transcode to aac, your best bet is iTunes.
mittyr
mittyr #4
Jul 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM
I use Mediacoder to transcode my mp3 files to aac With nero encoder HE-AAc v2

There's no point in encoding from one lossy format to another. Never be a fair comparison.

If the source is lossless or atleast 320kps (mp3), aac (mp4/m4a) will deliver more quality at 64kbps than mp3 codec (simple fact : it can compress better). Make sure to keep HEv2 below 128kps & LC for above.

But "ogg" at 64kps encoded with aoTuV (ogg encoder) will beat them both hands-down.

any other better encoder settings or FREE software to transcode aac would be appreciated

Almost all use "Nero-encoder" (except shitty iTunes) & its free. Only your settings & the source matters. Still, my personal fav is foobar with all encoders.