DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026
dOm1naTOr
dOm1naTOr Original post #1
May 14, 2009 at 1:44 AM
Advanced Micro Devices has demonstrated its twelve-core microprocessors operating in a 4-way server just days after it said it would start selling six-core chips in May, 2009. Thanks to multi-chip-module nature of the code-named Magny-Cours processor, creation of such chip was a relatively easy challenge.

AMD Opteron 6000-series code-named Magny-Cours with twelve processing engines will be released in the first quarter of 2010, according to some reports. However, already now AMD can demonstrate the chip to public and customers to show off its benefits compared to competing platforms and technologies.

read on:*www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20090424224319_AMD_Demonstrates_Twelve_Core_Microprocessors.html
dOm1naTOr
May 14, 2009 at 1:46 AM
Also
6 core proccy on its way
*www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/...processors_in_May_to_Boost_Profitability.html



and 16 core in 2 years
*www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/...ixteen_Core_Microprocessors_in_Two_Years.html
infra_red_dude
May 14, 2009 at 8:08 AM
The world is moving towards tiled CMP architecture. The day won't be far when CPUs will haf hundreds of core like the current GPUs. We are working on such a project for CPUs at our university. A serious concern as of now is cache consistency due to data sharing by various cores. The current consistency models slow down the performance.

The CPU-GPU gap is converging and tiled CMP is the future :)
MetalheadGautham
May 14, 2009 at 10:07 AM
Nice. I think the yield will be pretty poor though. More the cores, lesser the yields. So we can expect 11 core, 10 core, 9 core, etc CPUs in plenty while real 12 core CPUs manufactured will be less. This alone can drive their prices up.

And when will AMD do something to implement multithreading in a single core ?
infra_red_dude
May 14, 2009 at 12:36 PM
Nice. I think the yield will be pretty poor though. More the cores, lesser the yields. So we can expect 11 core, 10 core, 9 core, etc CPUs in plenty while real 12 core CPUs manufactured will be less. This alone can drive their prices up.

And when will AMD do something to implement multithreading in a single core ?
Increasing number of cores has nothing to do with the yield. Its the die area which affects the yield. The smaller the die area, the better the yeild. With the current technology, they can cram a lot of cores in a specific area.
MetalheadGautham
May 14, 2009 at 4:50 PM
^^You sure ? Because AMD Phenom II CPUs are as big as Nehalem CPUs while having much lesser power. It was one of the reasons why AMD was said to be a lot less profitable than Intel.
S
May 14, 2009 at 5:14 PM
12 cores? I doubt any games/applications would use 12 cores. Anyways,good to see more than 4 cores :D
MetalheadGautham
May 14, 2009 at 5:36 PM
^^Thats why gamers still buy Dual Cores while multitaskers get maximum no. of cores.
Coool
Coool #9
May 14, 2009 at 5:55 PM
And it takes another 2years to utilise that 16cores:p
abhinav_bipnesh
May 14, 2009 at 6:01 PM
Guys to get most out of the core we need OS which can schedule the thing in a good manner so that we can get max performance but right now i think we dont have such good options to deal with....:(
abhinav_bipnesh
May 14, 2009 at 6:02 PM
Guys to get most out of the core we need OS which can schedule the thing in a good manner so that we can get max performance but right now i think we dont have such good options to deal with.... :(
MetalheadGautham
May 14, 2009 at 6:03 PM
Linux seems to have great Multicore scaling BTW
hellknight
May 14, 2009 at 6:11 PM
^+1
Compiling a new kernel for the cores available on your system makes a lot of performance difference.
confused
confused #14
May 14, 2009 at 6:11 PM
The world is moving towards tiled CMP architecture. The day won't be far when CPUs will haf hundreds of core like the current GPUs. We are working on such a project for CPUs at our university. A serious concern as of now is cache consistency due to data sharing by various cores. The current consistency models slow down the performance.

The CPU-GPU gap is converging and tiled CMP is the future :)
thanks for info. which univ btw??
x3060
x3060 #17
May 15, 2009 at 1:14 AM
hmm...i think s/w needs to catch up very fast. else all the cores are going to be a waist
infra_red_dude
May 15, 2009 at 9:14 AM
^^You sure ? Because AMD Phenom II CPUs are as big as Nehalem CPUs while having much lesser power. It was one of the reasons why AMD was said to be a lot less profitable than Intel.
The die yield is given by the forumla:
Die yield = K / Die area (or size), where K is a constant depending on various factors.

thanks for info. which univ btw??
Am at North Carolina State University.

This will give you some idea:
*phoenix-ani.blogspot.com/ :p
:)
rosemolr
rosemolr #19
May 15, 2009 at 10:20 AM
any idea about the clock speed??
MetalheadGautham
May 15, 2009 at 10:32 AM
^^All hail Infra, future CEO of Anirudh Microsystems :p
comp@ddict
May 15, 2009 at 10:51 AM
AMD is getting out 6 core procc for say 350$, and INTEL is on with 2 core procc for 250$ what irony!!!!!!!!
MetalheadGautham
May 15, 2009 at 11:07 AM
AMD is getting out 6 core procc for say 350$, and INTEL is on with 2 core procc for 250$ what irony!!!!!!!!
WTF ? Don't you EVER understand ?
They are targeted at DIFFERENT MARKETS. :razz:
Gamers want 5GHz Dual Cores while some others want 3GHz Hexa Cores.