DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

AMD vs.Intel

30 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/amd-vs-intel.100757/

TheLetterD
TheLetterD Original post #1
Oct 27, 2008 at 8:32 PM
Hey Dudes ....Starting a new thread on Intel VS. Amd processors.comparison<by prise> starts at intels cheapest dual core n amd's. YOU tell wich is better:confused::(:):mad::D:rolleyes:
esumitkumar
Oct 27, 2008 at 8:40 PM
I support AMD so does chip n digit :D
TheLetterD
Oct 27, 2008 at 8:51 PM
I support AMD so does chip n digit :D

Dude ithink u didnt get me ...i mean compare each an every2 procssr of the same price performance wise for eg. the e7200 to 6000+ x2... fr the debate ill strt another thread..

now look ill strt d thread.
e2140 vs. 4200+ x2
esumitkumar
Oct 27, 2008 at 8:54 PM
^^hmm..carry on :)
H
Oct 28, 2008 at 10:44 AM
compared wat u may but i learnt this the hard way:
INTEL RULES......
TheLetterD
Oct 28, 2008 at 3:40 PM
hey dudes off the topic: will farcry run on vista strtr 32 bit with a 7050/610i mobo?

well ill like 2 continue with the thread but actuall comparing has 2 include benchmarking so is dere out there any 1 which has a bnchmrkin sftware & can tell d performance of any cpu?
D
Oct 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM
intel = today's champion
AMD = Yesterday's champion
comp@ddict
Oct 30, 2008 at 1:44 PM
AMD=Tomorrow's Champion
desiibond
Oct 30, 2008 at 1:59 PM
As of today, Intel has advantage in every price point. Their core2 architecuters are making life really difficult for AMD.

btw, AMD's share dropped another 2% in desktop CPU market this quarter.

I have been AMD lover for long and I do hope that they will be back in full form in a year or two.

If they get to the performance level or Intel's core2quad by next summer, I will go for it else my next upgrade will be Intel.
TheLetterD
Oct 30, 2008 at 7:59 PM
pls now ppl can we get back 2 benchmarking<v can use vistas performance checker>
B
Bandu #11
Oct 30, 2008 at 10:43 PM
I'd read about AMD 780G Chipset with onboard ATI Radeon™ HD 3200 Graphics that made AMD boards the best choice boards for small and low profile HTPC builds (without the need for an additional graphics card). Has rival Intel come up with such onboard graphics?
Zangetsu
Zangetsu #12
Oct 31, 2008 at 12:45 PM
I'd read about AMD 780G Chipset with onboard ATI Radeon™ HD 3200 Graphics that made AMD boards the best choice boards for small and low profile HTPC builds (without the need for an additional graphics card). Has rival Intel come up with such onboard graphics?

its an eye-catching board dude!!! :D
i dont think intel has dat similer board...:cool:
Psychosocial
Oct 31, 2008 at 1:05 PM
^^Enter G43/G45....

Intel is the best and will be the best. AMD was the market/performance ruler of yesterday but now, they are just 'meh'.
MetalheadGautham
Oct 31, 2008 at 1:19 PM
^^Enter G43/G45....

Intel is the best and will be the best. AMD was the market/performance ruler of yesterday but now, they are just 'meh'.

Lolz which world do you live in ? G43/G45 comes nowhere close to 780G. It can't even beat 780V in graphics performance. As for cost, its sky high.
comp@ddict
Oct 31, 2008 at 1:43 PM
YEs that's true, but fact is, the gfx industry is dominated by INTEL, 40%+ is Intel's share due to their onboard solutions. People mostly buy onboard gfx mobos tht's y
Psychosocial
Oct 31, 2008 at 1:47 PM
Hmm... ya. Just checked the charts. But well, 945G and X3000 had a lot of success.
comp@ddict
Oct 31, 2008 at 1:56 PM
Yes ppl continued buying them(they don't understand which alien word Nvidia is, or what does AMD stand for lolz)
MetalheadGautham
Oct 31, 2008 at 2:21 PM
Thats because several people believe that a C2Q Q9550 on an Intel Original DG31PV motherboard is the fastest performing rig in the world, without realizing the importance of a graphics solution and expansion slots on the motherboard.
Psychosocial
Oct 31, 2008 at 2:32 PM
^^Ya.... especially the consumers who just blindly follow the vendor's rants.
H
hellgate #20
Oct 31, 2008 at 2:36 PM
^^^ and most vendors consider 8600GT a uber high end gaming card.
Psychosocial
Oct 31, 2008 at 2:56 PM
^^Sorry... here 8400GS is teh ultimate card :(.
B
Bandu #23
Oct 31, 2008 at 10:08 PM
Is it still true that AMD Phenoms are "true" quad cores (based on monolithic multicore design) as opposed to Intels multichip design?**

Or is it a yesteryear saying? Has Intel come up with a "true" core design lately?

Agreed that Intel has the larger market share, but what about performance? Can someone post performance results for our comparison?

** Source: wikipedia
Psychosocial
Oct 31, 2008 at 10:13 PM
AMDs X4s gets kicked by Intel's C2Ds in gaming.... leave alone the Quads. Intel is the ruler.... atleast now.
desiibond
desiibond #26
Nov 1, 2008 at 11:09 AM
^^ Actually, beats X4 at same price leve by quite a big margin.
Psychosocial
Nov 1, 2008 at 11:12 AM
Hey KaranTh85, I know its hard to swallow but your fav. company does not stand a chance against Intel. We had this discussion somewhere else too where you were going to buy a new PC :).
desiibond
desiibond #28
Nov 1, 2008 at 11:16 AM
^^Dude, it's your 14 b'day today. get off this forum and enjoy your day!!!
Zangetsu
Zangetsu #29
Nov 1, 2008 at 11:21 AM
^^ Actually, beats X4 at same price leve by quite a big margin.

OH..then ne latest news on AMD's upcoming plans on its proccys..:(

Hey KaranTh85, I know its hard to swallow but your fav. company does not stand a chance against Intel. We had this discussion somewhere else too where you were going to buy a new PC :).
my current config is intel..then how can u say AMD is my favourate...
second..i dont swallow i chew....coz i have healthy teeth...
desiibond
desiibond #30
Nov 1, 2008 at 11:46 AM
^^LOLZ. Am using AMD rig right now but am eagerly waiting for the AMD Deneb/Fusion platform.

After looking at the power of Nehalem a.k.a Core i7, I seriously doubt now if AMD can match Intel in next 5-6 years.