DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Amd Vs Intel

53 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/amd-vs-intel.39067/

M
mostwanted Original post #1
Oct 19, 2006 at 11:38 AM
guys the processors wars have really heaten up.both the gianta intel and amd are tryin to outsmart each other in each and every way.
So who do you think is better
INTEL OR AMD?
thewisecrab
Oct 19, 2006 at 11:43 AM
Thi s is a very old debate u have started but currently i think intel is winning with its core2duo
Third Eye
Oct 19, 2006 at 11:48 AM
what's the point of this thread....
samrulez
Oct 19, 2006 at 12:08 PM
Currently

C2D,

But for the furure, just 2 words!

AM3 & HTT 3.0 ! :D
D
Oct 19, 2006 at 12:12 PM
Nothing beats a Cyrix proccy on a VIA mobo with Sis graphics. Intel and AMD are way to slow for my taste.
sysfilez
Oct 19, 2006 at 3:17 PM
drvarunmehta said:
Nothing beats a Cyrix proccy on a VIA mobo with Sis graphics. Intel and AMD are way to slow for my taste.
i have de same specs as u hav mentioned. it really out performs any pc of current day. its a 1999 make. still going strong.
spyingshadow
Oct 24, 2006 at 3:49 PM
vot? what' that Sis n Cyrix proccy stuff? i never heven heard of that. gosh... looks like sm serious marketing flaws if they had such a good system, but i am still not convinced. Hey u sysfilez, just give sm more proof. prolly u'll save me sm hair loss if tht's true.
S
saran_2006 #8
Oct 30, 2006 at 9:04 AM
Amd - Amd - Amd
caleb
caleb #9
Oct 30, 2006 at 10:06 AM
drvarunmehta said:
Nothing beats a Cyrix proccy on a VIA mobo with Sis graphics. Intel and AMD are way to slow for my taste.
Wow!!! all the marketing staff (top to bottom)of those 3 companies should be fired for doing a lousy job at promoting their products, that is IF their products are as good as you claim.
Root2
Root2 #10
Oct 31, 2006 at 10:37 AM
sis graphics r outdated i suppose coz alll da motherboards nowadays have readeon graphics... n not sis..

drvarunmehta said:
Nothing beats a Cyrix proccy on a VIA mobo with Sis graphics. Intel and AMD are way to slow for my taste.
__________
i prefer intel's c2d ...
kirtan
kirtan #11
Oct 31, 2006 at 5:03 PM
Intel
kumarmohit
Oct 31, 2006 at 5:47 PM
Oh No Puhleeez
Not again
assasin
assasin #13
Oct 31, 2006 at 11:44 PM
Dont tell me guys dat u havnt heard bout the IBM cyrix processors.My frnd had one.to tell the truth it wasnt dat bad a processor.As far as Sis is concerned u'll still find Sis chipset MoBos for AMD.
R
Nov 1, 2006 at 12:06 AM
AMD did pull back some ground for the past 4 yrs but Intel remains consistent.And with C2D Intel's my choice.
Manshahia
Manshahia #15
Nov 1, 2006 at 12:23 AM
INTEL ofcourse
deathvirus_me
Nov 1, 2006 at 12:29 AM
Man ... can someone plz. hang me ??? This question doesn't have a fixed answers ...
Tech Geek
Tech Geek #17
Nov 1, 2006 at 11:27 AM
Intel C2D rocks
nishant_nms
Nov 2, 2006 at 7:32 AM
spyingshadow said:
vot? what' that Sis n Cyrix proccy stuff? i never heven heard of that. gosh... looks like sm serious marketing flaws if they had such a good system, but i am still not convinced. Hey u sysfilez, just give sm more proof. prolly u'll save me sm hair loss if tht's true.
nice joke
A
Nov 16, 2006 at 7:25 AM
hmm can we also consider cell processors powering 7th gen consoles in this category.???
__________
but as they r not available for desktop i am planning to buy a quad core by jan. from intel
Projjwal
Projjwal #20
Nov 20, 2006 at 12:50 AM
I think AMD becoz for its highly overclock feature.
rahull
rahull #21
Feb 3, 2007 at 1:13 PM
i like non but use Intel .

Both selling us old technology than they use in therelabs lol
My choice supercomputer lol
Pathik
Pathik #22
Feb 3, 2007 at 4:46 PM
Intel 4 now..
NIGHTMARE
NIGHTMARE #23
Feb 3, 2007 at 9:13 PM
now this time intel is winner but amd is best bcoz intel copy every thing from amd
Pathik
Pathik #24
Feb 3, 2007 at 9:31 PM
intel copying from amd !!!!! :shocked: go get a life man... :p
NIGHTMARE
NIGHTMARE #25
Feb 4, 2007 at 11:47 PM
watch out the cool video---> *rapidshare.com/files/14731643/AMD_Athlon_vs_Intel.mpg
144
144 #26
Feb 8, 2007 at 4:36 PM
AMD is really cost-effective, when compared to every Intel counter-part. But I opted for Intel because, at the moment, Intel Core2Duo surpasses the AMD AM2 Duals. The most significant for was the L2 Cache.
D
Feb 8, 2007 at 6:14 PM
Everybody says Intel Core2Duo tops, but who's buying it?
Wisen up folks, the average buyers range of purchasing capacity is upto say 14k but that 14k utself is somewhat the higher side.

So what u get to know is AMD holds and still is ahead of the race and what the average users should go for is AMD.

Hope AMD will soon overtake the Core2Duo also.
anandk
anandk #28
Feb 12, 2007 at 10:45 PM
check this *www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html?modelx=33&model1=430&model2=464&chart=189
144
144 #29
Feb 18, 2007 at 1:43 AM
Nice link Anandk. I couldn't help but notice the fact that AMD still out runs the core 2 duos in certain benchmarks - esp the 3ds max 8.0 render.
joey_182
joey_182 #30
Feb 19, 2007 at 11:29 PM
intel my friends intel...
__________
nice link anandk
K
kunaltech #31
Feb 20, 2007 at 5:08 AM
amd
sysfilez
sysfilez #32
Feb 20, 2007 at 11:07 AM
drvarunmehta said:
Nothing beats a Cyrix proccy on a VIA mobo with Sis graphics. Intel and AMD are way to slow for my taste.
i own xactly de same config. wow i beat eveyone.
C
Feb 24, 2007 at 5:40 PM
Intel may have won now, but let the FUSION come out then lets take this topic.
S
s_aerin #34
Feb 24, 2007 at 6:01 PM
caleb said:
Wow!!! all the marketing staff (top to bottom)of those 3 companies should be fired for doing a lousy job at promoting their products, that is IF their products are as good as you claim.
dont u guys know sarcasm when u see it?
they r pullimg ur leg. via,sis and cyrix together stand for pathetic.

i had an amd and now have an intel.
amd rocks.
S
sagsall4u #35
Mar 6, 2007 at 11:09 AM
i think intel c2d is better than any am2 procc but am2 being VFM i wud prefer AM2 witha nice mobo it should do the trick
Chetan1991
Mar 7, 2007 at 3:46 PM
I think in the long run of time,AMD will be the winner with its Dual core Processors as the north bridge technology of intel makes the speed low.
There was an article on this topic in Digit issue of September 2005.:D
shashank4u
Mar 7, 2007 at 4:03 PM
i dont wanna to take sides
but amd has left behind intel in teraflop computing :"Teraflop in a box"
i ve also reviewed it in my blog...
chicha
chicha #38
Mar 13, 2007 at 10:31 PM
When you have an AMD you can not look further.
Its simply super. Come people who needs a core 2 duo now? Intel needed some thing like this to get ahead of the race.

And we all know about the Rabbit and the Hair storry. Don't we :p
I do not know where i read it but the word is Intel had predicted that their sales of core 2 duo won't be big.



AMD ALL THE WAY
dOm1naTOr
dOm1naTOr #39
Mar 13, 2007 at 11:32 PM
Yes, its really amazing how AMD is able to meet the demands in the market. Really many are amazed with AMD's production rate. And AMD has big role in bringing processor cost down [be in AMD or Intel]. As after beating some Intel series AMD wud bring a major price drop nd Intel too is forced to drop the price.
Maybe ATI also start dropping their prices by big margins[just a dream].

It wud really be big dominance for AMD with the all new FUSION nd Torenza along with R600 from ATI. Together they will bring a new era of computing.
xbonez
xbonez #40
Apr 5, 2007 at 1:07 PM
anyday AMD
ankushkool
May 1, 2007 at 8:24 PM
so i hav decided... AMD X2, a good mobo n a good graphics card. but what falls in de category of good graphics card n whats de price range
S
slash_89 #42
May 1, 2007 at 10:33 PM
AMD all the way.
ankushkool
May 4, 2007 at 6:15 PM
suggest me a good graphics card n whats de price range????
Pathik
Pathik #44
May 4, 2007 at 6:23 PM
^^ wats ur budget... wait for ati dx10 gpus...
or if u wanna take then go 4 a 8600gt... arnd 10k
csczero
csczero #45
May 28, 2007 at 4:49 AM
AMD dude anytime..... intel is all hype
M
Mayur #46
May 31, 2007 at 10:41 PM
AMD for budget PC and if mony no matter, C2D.
anandk
anandk #48
May 31, 2007 at 11:03 PM
one can compare any 2 processors here
*www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html
A
Jun 25, 2007 at 11:12 PM
AMD X2 rocks
gxsaurav
gxsaurav #51
Jun 25, 2007 at 11:18 PM
Whoever makes "the best bang for buck CPU right now" when I m in the market.
harryneopotter
Jun 26, 2007 at 10:10 AM
its AMD .....no point in discussion ..........VFM ... and gud mobos with on better onboard grafix at a much lesser price.........
cynosure
cynosure #53
Jun 26, 2007 at 10:39 AM
AMD is VFM but I hate the fact that the AM2 mobos wont be used for the upcoming quad cores but in Intel, you can use your current mobos for intel quads.
:(
This is so bad!!