DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

antivirus confusion.

28 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/antivirus-confusion.23950/

saurabh.sauron
saurabh.sauron Original post #1
Feb 17, 2006 at 8:11 AM
i got realy confused after seeing so many antivirus's. i want to ask if avast! is really reliable? is it better than norton?
M
Feb 17, 2006 at 9:24 AM
I find avast reliable. I used to use it. I find it better than norton as norton used to be a big resource hog in the past, dunno how is it now. I found a good detection rate in avast. Also, considering the recent norton's rootkit controversy, it would be good to choose avast over it.
BTW post in correct section if you expect answers to your questions.
anandk
anandk #3
Feb 18, 2006 at 9:47 PM
avsta and avg are Great freeware antivirus.
stick with them ! no need to really pay for one !
also download and use a anti-spyware like adaware or spybot.
R
Feb 18, 2006 at 10:00 PM
saurabh.sauron said:
i got realy confused after seeing so many antivirus's. i want to ask if avast! is really reliable? is it better than norton?


None can beat Norton Internet Security.Even though it take's some space it work's fine.many people say that it's a slow one.But when u go on use it u won't feal that i use it for 3 year's......

*img106.imageshack.us/img106/173/h4hj.th.jpg

And none of the antivirus give's all the feature's.........
sujithtom
Feb 19, 2006 at 11:30 AM
Well i just wanna know which AV is the least resource hogger?? Currently i am under the impression that its Panda AV. If there is any AV thats faster and has an average protecing capability plz tell me :)
R
Feb 19, 2006 at 11:42 AM
sujithtom said:
Well i just wanna know which AV is the least resource hogger?? Currently i am under the impression that its Panda AV. If there is any AV thats faster and has an average protecing capability plz tell me :)

Why don't u wan't 100% protection???????
sujithtom
Feb 19, 2006 at 1:01 PM
b'coz i am sure by PC won't be constantly under attack
anandk
anandk #8
Feb 19, 2006 at 6:39 PM
avg and nod32 r said to leave the lowest memory footprint. bitdefender, i rate highly; but its freeware version doz not give fulltime protection, it can only act as a on-demand scanner.
sujithtom
Feb 19, 2006 at 8:09 PM
AVG light on system??? I don't think so. I have used AVG 6.x and it hogged my system a lot..
sidewinder
Feb 19, 2006 at 9:33 PM
not again !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sid_ashok
sid_ashok #11
Feb 19, 2006 at 9:42 PM
vote for avast! its awsome
__Virus__
__Virus__ #12
Feb 19, 2006 at 11:10 PM
Always using Kaspersky and will :| My antivirus was never infected my any virus unlike others except Kaspersky :|
sujithtom
sujithtom #13
Feb 20, 2006 at 7:12 AM
dude virus what does your antivirus shows when u sit infront of computer???
djmykey
djmykey #14
Feb 20, 2006 at 7:44 AM
My experience with NOD32 was that it was the root cause of all the hangs my system has started to get now-a-days. After using KAV for a reeeeeallly long time I thought of to give NOD a shot but that AV was just too heavy for my system given that KAV used to run nicely on my system. When I checked I saw that NOD also took up the same RAM as much as KAV. Now which ver u ppl were using I dunno but my NOD was eating up almost 20 MB RAM. Its startup was painstakingly slow and it used to frequently hang my machine. See I'm not starting any war o anything this is just my personal experience and hence I just thought to shar it with ya ppl/
R
Retro #15
Feb 20, 2006 at 8:18 AM
Does'nt this thread belong in Software Troubleshooting?.. *Calls for a mod*
hpotter606
Feb 21, 2006 at 7:11 PM
I found avast a good antivirus and it is easy to use and uses less memory. Currently i have installed Ez trust antivirus and it doesnt seem good. I will switch back to avast now.
R
Feb 21, 2006 at 7:59 PM
i use McAfee and it rocks
rajat22
rajat22 #18
Feb 21, 2006 at 11:05 PM
What the resources will do if there is no system....taken away by any virus :?:
Play very safe.... I prefer Norton
sujithtom
sujithtom #19
Feb 22, 2006 at 7:20 AM
McAfee's pirated version is hard to get :(
shakti
shakti #20
Mar 17, 2006 at 2:28 AM
I m using McAfee and it will work fine
gary4gar
gary4gar #21
Mar 25, 2006 at 10:18 PM
i am using avast for few years with little viruses
nishant_nms
Mar 26, 2006 at 12:00 AM
As per my experinence Avast is lot better than Norton in terms of virus detection and system load
rollcage
rollcage #23
Apr 2, 2006 at 4:36 AM
And according to me AntiVir is better than Avast :wink:
Vyasram
Vyasram #24
Apr 2, 2006 at 8:21 AM
Avast rulez. Norton is a sys hog
~Phenom~
~Phenom~ #25
Apr 2, 2006 at 11:26 AM
I use avast and AVG for the last 5 months and no virus ( if any , rarely) goes undetected till now.
A
aakash #26
Apr 3, 2006 at 11:27 PM
Used Norton first: Res. Hog. Very Few Viruses.
Used Avast then: Light. Many Viruses.
Using Zone Alarm: A bit heavy but no viruses.
Vyasram
Vyasram #27
Apr 3, 2006 at 11:37 PM
zone alarm's av sux , only itz firewall is good
T
Apr 9, 2006 at 4:06 PM
avast is much better than norton. norton is a system hog.

i dont know about kaspersky but i am in LAN in my college with virus attacks at 10MBps!!!!. i get almost 20 attacks per day ( thanx to some smart ppl with no antivirus) and thanks to avast i am protected till date.