DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Apple gets design patent on virtual page turning, but doesn't own the page turn!!

12 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/apple-gets-design-patent-on-virtual-page-turning-but-doesnt-own-the-page-turn.166394/

Flash
Flash Original post #1
Nov 19, 2012 at 5:03 PM
The US Patent and Trademark Office issued a new design patent to Apple on electronic page turning last week, and it's certainly a bizarre one, but it's not as menacing as some have reported. Apple doesn't now own the page turn. While US patent D670,713 isn't exactly a narrow patent, there are some real limitations on what it covers and how it could be used against the competition.

Think of the D'713 patent as a very basic flip book depicting the type of virtual page turn claimed (shown below). It may be tempting to look at all of this as essential to emulating physical page turns on a device, but the patent simply isn't that broad.

Most of us are familiar with the numerous ways a page in iBooks can be manipulated and folded, but we have to be careful not to confuse what we know about Apple's software with what this patent covers. The drawings make it clear that the bottom-right corner is being pulled to lead the way and that the paper is folding over at a fairly consistent angle along its length — in contrast to a more drastic corner fold or a turn initiated at another part of the page, for instance. That's just one way to represent a page turn. One of many.

Patents previously issued to companies like Microsoft, Adobe, and even Apple, were cited during the USPTO's examination process and demonstrate that the emulation of physical page turning on electronic devices isn't new and this patent is necessarily limited by that history. Unless a competitor exactly copies this particular turning animation — and key players like Amazon and Barnes & Noble have not — it's not likely to be used as a powerful weapon in future litigation. It's more like a single arrow in Apple's ever-growing patent quiver, for whatever that's worth.

*assets.sbnation.com/assets/1762253/Page_Turn_Gif.gif
Apple gets design patent on virtual page turning, but doesn't own the page turn | The Verge

So what's next :apple: ?
D@rekills4
Nov 20, 2012 at 10:15 PM
Phew! Only virtual.
What a relief.
Flash
Flash #3
Nov 20, 2012 at 10:16 PM
@pple has the ability to screw everyone; So, it's a temporary relief!
Skud
Skud #4
Nov 20, 2012 at 10:25 PM
Phew! Only virtual.
What a relief.

:lol:

@pple has the ability to screw everyone; So, it's a temporary relief!


Yeah, you never know, after rectangles with rounded corner, it might very well be rectangles with flips.

And are there any other way by which you can turn a page?

And are there any other way by which you can turn a page?
maninder4k
Nov 20, 2012 at 10:26 PM
Apple always tries to get as many patents as it can & tries to utilize them. Recently Apple tried to sue a company named "iFone" because it resembles the word "iPhone" when we pronounce them. But Apple patented the name "iPhone" on year 2009 whereas the company on which Apple made the case patented the word "iFone" on year 2004. So the outcomes comes out to be nothing instead Apple has to pay the fine to the court for that case. :mrgreen:
Skud
Skud #7
Nov 20, 2012 at 10:49 PM
With your mouth? Would love to try that on a tablet or ebook reader.

On second thoughts, that is really patent worthy. Or flipping digital pages by moistening your fingers with saliva. ;)
Flash
Flash #8
Nov 20, 2012 at 11:34 PM
^
Averment?
There are already problems going in FB, for a comment.
This comment of yours is SERIOUSLY SERIOUS.

@ Commander: Check this link.

*www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&safe...1161.0j3j5-1.4.0.les;..0.0...1c.1.LUoHKoSTTsg

In Internet, we are no longer private. Atleast someone in the world, thinks like you.
gameranand
Nov 20, 2012 at 11:41 PM
Well After that Rectangular shape patent, its nothing. :p
pratyush997
Nov 20, 2012 at 11:56 PM
Apple always tries to get as many patents as it can & tries to utilize them. Recently Apple tried to sue a company named "iFone" because it resembles the word "iPhone" when we pronounce them. But Apple patented the name "iPhone" on year 2009 whereas the company on which Apple made the case patented the word "iFone" on year 2004. So the outcomes comes out to be nothing instead Apple has to pay the fine to the court for that case. :mrgreen:
*s15.postimage.org/5cfzdl5yv/image.jpg
harshilsharma63
Nov 23, 2012 at 5:42 PM
I think there should be a new version of Angry Birds; patent wars; - featuring Apple as the dumbest bird, or maybe a pig :-D
Anorion
Anorion #12
Nov 23, 2012 at 6:09 PM
haters gonna hate