DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Bajaj vs Hero Honda

42 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/bajaj-vs-hero-honda.75004/

hellknight
hellknight Original post #1
Dec 6, 2007 at 6:35 PM
Hey guys this is the new thread i'm posting. Its about Bajaj vs Hero Honda.

Please post your reviews about this hot topic and also vote.

Myself, i'm supporter of Bajaj and acc. to me Hero Honda sucks.

they introduce their so called crappy bike in the late 80's and we're still suffering from their sick 97 cc engine. They have stil not changed that engine and continue to sell it to this date. They do nothing in terms of R&D. Only thing is that do is to change the paint job and just add plus sign to their bikes.

On the other hand, Bajaj intoduces something new every year. They revamp thier bikes every year, as we have seen Pulsar. Their pricing is also right and their technology is also perfact.

Please guys, post your views and also vote on the forum.
NucleusKore
Dec 6, 2007 at 6:44 PM
Bajaj is a good motorcycle manufacturer, and that depends on which of their bikes you are talking about. I have an Avenger, which is really good. Then Pulsar is good too, and I'm not so sure about the lower end :p heard they suck, but you should also see the type of people who drive those and the expectations they have for the money they pay.
A
amol48 #3
Dec 6, 2007 at 6:46 PM
^LOL.. till now 100% Votes for Hamara BAJAJ... No one for fights in fight club :p
Pathik
Pathik #4
Dec 6, 2007 at 6:48 PM
Hero Honda is known for its service and reliability and Bajaj is known for innovation.
BTW i dont think that they compete in the same segments currently.
Herohonda wins in the 100 cc segment (Splendor > Platina)
and baja wins in the 125/135/150+ cc.
Dunno if Hunk ll beat Pulsar.
NucleusKore
Dec 6, 2007 at 6:54 PM
Bajaj motorcycle service is good too, so is their breakdown service here in Mangalore. I got stuck once due to water in the petrol. Have started filling at Shell since. One thing I like about Bajaj is service and parts are affordable. You can keep going to the company for maintainance. They have a good system too. An executive collects your vehicle, and gives it to you when you leave. There is no interaction with the mechanic so no need to tip. Some may argue its not a good thing :)
Krazy_About_Technology
Dec 18, 2007 at 11:07 PM
I have a Discover 125 and i am very much pleased with it. Bajaj's engines are superb in performance and now in fuel efficiency also. If taken proper care, they run like a beast. The only problem that i found in bajaj mcycles is their sound, its a little much as the bike gets older.
I
Ifra Binza #7
Sep 1, 2008 at 4:35 PM
:)Hello!

I like Hero Honda bikes very much because their models are attractive and trendy but Bajaj scooters and bikes are not good looking.

===================================================================

Ifra:)
<a href="*www.lookforward.info">look4ward</a>[/i]
Ecko
Ecko #8
Sep 1, 2008 at 5:10 PM
^LoL
Hero Honda tried everything to sell their Splendor (Super Duper Trooper & Whooper)
but they still suck
I think they have got what they could've from us & its excess of it now
skeletor
Sep 1, 2008 at 5:55 PM
Royal Enfield FTW....!!! :lol:

No-one comes close to the legend - Bullet.....:D
G
genxguy #10
Sep 1, 2008 at 6:53 PM
:)Hello!

I like Hero Honda bikes very much because their models are attractive and trendy but Bajaj scooters and bikes are not good looking.

===================================================================

Ifra:)
<a href="*www.lookforward.info">look4ward</a>[/i]

LOL...you registered this forum just to bump this thread :rolleyes::D:D:D:D
Rahim
Rahim #12
Sep 1, 2008 at 8:21 PM
Royal Enfield = Phatphattiyaaa D:

Pulsar has kicked Honda out.
skeletor
skeletor #13
Sep 1, 2008 at 8:45 PM
A very well known typical Jat view.. :D
Surely yes.....:p

Royal Enfield = Phatphattiyaaa D:
Jiske upar aiwe-hi koi bachcha beth jaaye, toh uski phat-ti zaroor hai....:lol:

Its a Cruiser.....not a fuel performance bike....

But yeah, Bajaj vs Hero Honda, Bajaj has totally kicked Hero Honda.
R
Sep 1, 2008 at 9:25 PM
me and my frnd have bought bikes in jan 2007. I took HeroHonda Glamour 125 wit Disc brks he took Bajaj Discover DTSi. Now let me explain the conditions of our bike I completed 30,000Km mark he is not far frm me either. Apart frm changing spark plugs and some wires I havent spen anyhing on my bike on the other hand he had to change the Clutch plates, Chain and shock absorbers. he had to change to clutch plates as he bike get hot while consistently going at a speed of 60-70. I donot have that problem my bike stays cool. Milage glamour now gives 60Km/lit in city and 65-70 In Highways.
Discover in city gives 55-60 and on highways 70+.
In pick-up also Hero Honda beats Discover. my bike had even touched 9Kms/hr speed.
Now my frnd realy hate Discover.
Rahim
Rahim #15
Sep 1, 2008 at 9:53 PM
Jiske upar aiwe-hi koi bachcha beth jaaye, toh uski phat-ti zaroor hai....:lol
Yes you will get plenty of kids from Arsenal youth Academy for this :))
skeletor
skeletor #16
Sep 1, 2008 at 9:58 PM
Yes you will get plenty of kids from Arsenal youth Academy for this :))
Well, I'm myself a kid and I've been able to easily ride Bullet 350 Electra........:D

By 'bachche' I mean weaklings.....:lol: You can consider C. Ronaldo one of them....A crybaby......:lol:
Edburg
Edburg #17
Sep 1, 2008 at 10:53 PM
sure innovation and R&D is lacking in HH but bajaj is no where near its reliability...

even auto car india acknowledged that bajaj has quality problems but also lower spare parts...so that kind of makes up for it...but still

i own a hunk myself and my friend recently bought a pulsar 150....mine kicks the butt of pulsar in high speed handling,feel,looks(subjective)...thing in pulsar is that gadgets and electronics are abundant....but on the core side of biking i prefer HH

my preference is that i like the composure and feel of kariszma better than the aggressiveness of RTR FI....
Psychosocial
Sep 2, 2008 at 10:51 PM
Bajaj ftw..... Pulsar 220 DTSi ftw..... Discover 135 DTSi ftw......

As per me, I am 13 and riding a Honda Activa without a license and just got my Number-plate before that I was riding without a number-plate for 4 months :D:D.
a_k_s_h_a_y
Sep 2, 2008 at 11:13 PM
Bajaj of coruse.
HH is a stickering company.
evewin89
evewin89 #20
Sep 3, 2008 at 2:19 AM
both company produces good bikes, but the truth is BAJAJ is far behind HH,
bajaj bike lovers always praise PULSER but wat abt. platina? jst. drive platina 1ce n after dat jst drive ny 100cc bike frm HH n u'll definately feel da difference.
according 2 me UNICORN is far better than PULSAR.
Edburg
Edburg #21
Sep 3, 2008 at 8:38 AM
^^ and even hunk too far better than pulsar 150...

and RTR series and ones from yamaha are taking on the high end pulsars for good....

so if bajaj has no takings in low end offerings and also in high end ones...let God alone decide their future...

btw i heard bajaj is goin to launch a lpg variant of duo fuel bikes...wud love to see the reviews of that..

HH is a stickering company.

so bajaj does not have the same design for almost a decade for pulsar 150,180 and only slight difference for 200 and 220(this one sucks)...their design trend is also visible in discover series and others too...

the only area that bajaj excels is in fancy gadgets like backlighting,etc.....in core biking needs like handling,quality,reliability,feel,etc it sucks

they introduce their so called crappy bike in the late 80's and we're still suffering from their sick 97 cc engine. They have stil not changed that engine and continue to sell it to this date. They do nothing in terms of R&D. Only thing is that do is to change the paint job and just add plus sign to their bikes.

when u have something that sells well and is welcomed well by the consumer there is no reason to stop selling it....with a little R&D they shud have made it better but still bajaj in 2008 has no answer to HH tech of 80s and are not able to produce such a reliable and quality bike...their low end bikes totally sucks
H
hellgate #22
Sep 3, 2008 at 9:46 AM
hav a 3yr old Discover 125 DTS-i.till now the only prob that i've faced is of inconsistent mileage.currently its at an all time low of 35-40kmpl.
so i'm thinking of dumping it and getting a YZF-R15.

havent had much xperience riding HH bikes so cant say much.though i'll say that Bajaj bikes look btter than HH.
Psychosocial
Sep 3, 2008 at 11:11 AM
^^R15 costs a leg and a arm :|
evewin89
evewin89 #24
Sep 3, 2008 at 11:34 AM
hav a 3yr old Discover 125 DTS-i.till now the only prob that i've faced is of inconsistent mileage.currently its at an all time low of 35-40kmpl.
so i'm thinking of dumping it and getting a YZF-R15.

havent had much xperience riding HH bikes so cant say much.though i'll say that Bajaj bikes look btter than HH.
don't buy YZF-R15. coz it looks cool frm front-side only instead spend less money & buy KARIZMA.:rolleyes:
hellknight
Sep 3, 2008 at 11:59 AM
@gagandeep.. ROFL on fat-ti.. damn that was awesome.. Bullet is good.. i like Thunderbird more.. feels comfy.. and its perfect for my build.. 5'11" 75+ kg..
chooza
chooza #27
Dec 21, 2008 at 3:06 AM
Both are bad. Bajaj have new ideas but not reliability(forgot HUMARA BAJAJ), pulsars are known to not long standing,Paltinas too and so on. Hero Honda is suffering from presence of HONDA(no new product). It is not in thread, but I think from Indian Manufactures,TVS is better then both bcoz, they innovate(Apache, Flame, Scooty) but at the same time, they maintain quality(TVS Bikes are regular participants in National Rallies,races which both Bajaj and HH donot.
W
way2jatin #28
Aug 12, 2009 at 10:09 PM
Royal Enfield FTW....!!! :lol:

No-one comes close to the legend - Bullet.....:D


Truly no one can beat Royal Enfield acc. to style
skeletor
skeletor #29
Aug 12, 2009 at 11:08 PM
^ threads bump karna bund kar...
S
sanjay_ati #30
Mar 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM
How Is Super Splender? Please suggest.i want to purchase this bike
james347
james347 #31
Mar 24, 2010 at 11:38 AM
My First and current bike is Hero Honda CD-Deluxe which is best companion i had ever :p:p:p I love riding it and My vote goes for all rounder HERO HONDA!!! Bikes are very easy in riding and requires very less maintenance as compared to other vehicles.

@sanjay_ati

Super splender is good bike but gives less mileage so either go for splender or passion (electric start one)

____________________
Nokia 5800 Games
krates
krates #32
Mar 24, 2010 at 10:42 PM
none... It is the Yamaha..
D
Dark Soul #33
Mar 30, 2010 at 11:41 AM
There are many people complaining that HH has no R&D, no technolgy etc etc...
Have a look at the new Karizma ZMR

1. Programmable Fuel Injection -
I guess there are still no bikes from bajaj with FI (Correct me if I am wrong)
Hence Bajaj bikes cannot exploit the benefits of ECU controlled injection. They still are sticking to their age old Micro controller controlled Spark ignition system

2. Catalytic convertor
Karizma ZMR's exhaust comes equipped with the catalytic convertor, which reduces pollution

3. ZMR comes with a bike tilt angle sensor!

4. Styling! Its evident that bajaj bikes are no where near HH in this aspect.

5. Reliability - HH beats Bajaj again. There are many examples

Finally HH rocks!! :)
hellknight
Mar 30, 2010 at 12:13 PM
The FI in ZMR comes from Honda, the baap of Zero Anda.. ZMR just gives 17.6 BHP.. Apache RTR, Pulsar 180 and YZF-R15 all give 17 bhp too.. 220 DTS-i gives 20.5 BHP.. beat that..
D
Dark Soul #35
Mar 30, 2010 at 1:53 PM
The FI in ZMR comes from Honda, the baap of Zero Anda.. ZMR just gives 17.6 BHP.. Apache RTR, Pulsar 180 and YZF-R15 all give 17 bhp too.. 220 DTS-i gives 20.5 BHP.. beat that..

Torque
Karizma = 18.35N-m @ 6000 rpm
Apache 180 = 15.5 N-m @ 6500 at a much higher rpm
R15 = 15 N-m @ 7500 rom much higher rpm
Bajaj = 19.1 N-m @6000 rpm

From these results, it is clear that one should not judge a bike from facts and figures

And if it wasn't for kawasaki, bajaj would still be selling chetak and autos!! :razz:

Just one more thing, please don't bring Yamaha R15 into the discussion, that bike is god of all.
hellknight
Mar 30, 2010 at 3:09 PM
Dude.. you're so ignorant.. Kawasaki broke up with Bajaj a long time ago and that's why Pulsar was borned.. Regarding Torque.. look at the figures, Bajaj Pulsar produces higher torque than Karizma ZMR.. Moreover :-

Pulsar 220 - 150 KG
ZMR - 159 KG

again pwned.. regarding R15.. it sucks, you've to constantly rev the bike to put it into powerband.. it is awesome in handling, is lightweight but is only suited for short trips or race tracks, nothing else.. Our very own Apache RTR 180 pwns it, kicks its ass in every department...

Regarding higher RPM, bikes are meant to be revved at higher RPM, what's the use of writing Sports on Karizma, when you can't rev it beyond 6k RPM.. besides, look at those sucky tyres, they're so thin.. it sucks, period!!
D
Dark Soul #37
Mar 30, 2010 at 4:01 PM
Understand the post before you call someone ignorant!! :x:x
Bajaj without kawasaki would not have reached this heights, just like HH.
Study Bajaj's timeline.

And FYI
I know very well that now there are no ties between bajaj and kawasaki.

If the bike produces max power or torque at lower RPM (or more usefull range I would say), it is better. No idiot would rev to 8500 rpm in day to day city travel.

---------- Post added at 04:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:25 PM ----------

Also don't contradict yourself in the same post :smile:

again pwned.. regarding R15.. it sucks, you've to constantly rev the bike to put it into powerband.. it is awesome in handling, is lightweight but is only suited for short trips or race tracks, nothing else.. Our very own Apache RTR 180 pwns it, kicks its ass in every department...

Ya reving the engine is bad...

Regarding higher RPM, bikes are meant to be revved at higher RPM, what's the use of writing Sports on Karizma, when you can't rev it beyond 6k RPM.. besides, look at those sucky tyres, they're so thin.. it sucks, period!!

Oh no now reving is good!! I guess R15 is also branded as sports bike!!
hellknight
Mar 30, 2010 at 4:27 PM
Dude, what i meant to say was that R15 sucks in the terms of torque, to move around in the city, you've to put it into the power band, constantly shifting gears becomes a headache after sometime..
chooza
chooza #40
Apr 6, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Dude.. you're so ignorant.. Kawasaki broke up with Bajaj a long time ago and that's why Pulsar was borned.. Regarding Torque.. look at the figures, Bajaj Pulsar produces higher torque than Karizma ZMR.. Moreover :-

Pulsar 220 - 150 KG
ZMR - 159 KG

again pwned.. regarding R15.. it sucks, you've to constantly rev the bike to put it into powerband.. it is awesome in handling, is lightweight but is only suited for short trips or race tracks, nothing else.. Our very own Apache RTR 180 pwns it, kicks its ass in every department...

Regarding higher RPM, bikes are meant to be revved at higher RPM, what's the use of writing Sports on Karizma, when you can't rev it beyond 6k RPM.. besides, look at those sucky tyres, they're so thin.. it sucks, period!!
Brother, Bajaj and Kawasaki are still into collabration of technical knowhow, that why Newer kwack are here in India, but they will not into logosharing.

---------- Post added at 10:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:00 PM ----------

The FI in ZMR comes from Honda, the baap of Zero Anda.. ZMR just gives 17.6 BHP.. Apache RTR, Pulsar 180 and YZF-R15 all give 17 bhp too.. 220 DTS-i gives 20.5 BHP.. beat that..

But R-15 can beat p220 any given time.p220 is fact in straight line but in corners, r-15,due to its chassis, zoom ahaead and have better control on riding.
celldweller1591
Apr 10, 2010 at 4:45 AM
Bajaj Pulsar is the best bike :) taken into consideraion- fuel efficiency , bhp , top speed and looks. Even more, it is economical .60k is paisa vaool at pulsar .
So for me , bajaj vs honda - Bajaj is a clear winner .
dissel
dissel #42
Apr 10, 2010 at 6:16 PM
Seeking for info point of view,

Can anyone put the mileage figure in the City of HH Hunk & P150 ?

And Is it same between CBZ Xtreme & Hunk ?