Benchmarks of MMX A90 and MMX A100 - now say!

R

Benchmarks of Micromax A90 and A100 - now say!

Hello geeks,

I am sharing some test results of two devices. I am not so much into mobiles and hence cannot depict the results appropriately. The two devices are the MMX A90 and A100.

Here are the benchmarks of A90:
1> Quadrant: 2543 which is above LG Optimus 2X, HTC Dezire HD and Google Nexus S
2> Nenamark 2: 24.3fps
3> AnTuTu Benchmark: 3887 (gave it 3/5 stars) [CPU:1365, GPU:1426, RAM:515]
4> Supports to 3 Multi-touch

Here are the benchmarks of A100:
1> Quadrant: 2189 which is above HTC Dezire HD and Google Nexus S
2> Nenamark 2: 16.3fps
3> AnTuTu Benchmark: 2845 (gave it 2/5 stars) [CPU:1027, GPU:1021, RAM:293]
4> Supports to 5 Multi-touch

Now, please tell me which device is better considering the above specifications and nothing else. And does 3 touch and 5 touch make a huge difference? People having knowledge of the marks are requested to answer. I would appreciate your responses.

It all boils down to whether you want a 5" display or a 4.3" display.

If I were you, I would pick the Micromax A90 and run. For 12k, it's a steal. But I think in a month the price might drop to 10k or 11k. Even then, at 12k itself it's amazing.

No beyond 3 point touch you really aren't missing much don't worry.

R

comp@ddict said:
It all boils down to whether you want a 5" display or a 4.3" display.

If I were you, I would pick the Micromax A90 and run. For 12k, it's a steal. But I think in a month the price might drop to 10k or 11k. Even then, at 12k itself it's amazing.

No beyond 3 point touch you really aren't missing much don't worry.

Thank you, and 5" is always liked, but 4.3'' i still big enough for me. I find my previous Samsung mobile of 3.2" a bit long! But according to the benchmarks, A90 is better than A100, right?

A90 is much better than A100 in terms of:

- Processor (dual core)
- GPU (faster)
- Display (SuperAMOLED)

The A90 makes more sense to me, unless you want a huge display.

comp@ddict said:
A90 is much better than A100 in terms of:

- Processor (dual core)
- GPU (faster)
- Display (SuperAMOLED)

The A90 makes more sense to me, unless you want a huge display.

It's NOT a dual-core.

T

NHS2008 said:
It's NOT a dual-core.

+1 to that

Both Micromax A100 and Micromax A90 have 1 Ghz SINGLE CORE processor

evem at single core its still good buy ..... if we see any price drop

I've bought ZOPO ZP100 from China!

Same specs as A90, sans Amoled display, higher res screen and five point touch with Dual-LED flash and 8 m.pix snapper.

How much that zopo cost you and performance ?

GUYS................ i want to buy MMX A100, what u'll suggest. I just want this phone for net surfing, and sometine calling. Mainly want to use this cell like TAB.

Be careful before buying micromax cr@p, their funbook tab has some battery issues, a very widespread issue and known to all(service center guy told me its a rampant issue), yet they said they will need 1-2 months for the rma, that's how pathetic their quality and service are, remember quality comes at a price.

tkin said:
Be careful before buying micromax cr@p, their funbook tab has some battery issues, a very widespread issue and known to all(service center guy told me its a rampant issue), yet they said they will need 1-2 months for the rma, that's how pathetic their quality and service are, remember quality comes at a price.

But i've heard that their service is improved now, by d way. From where i can buy this mobile phone?

OOS on all online shopping site