DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Best Camcorder (15K-20K)

27 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/best-camcorder-15k-20k.23499/

PainKiller
PainKiller Original post #1
Feb 9, 2006 at 10:01 PM
hi all,

posting after a long time :) ok, i need to know what are the best camcorders available in the market. my budget is around 15K-20K

thanx in advance.
zombie
zombie #2
Feb 10, 2006 at 11:39 AM
Close your eyes, take a deep breath, walk to the nearest Sony World showroom and pick up any Sony camcorder that fits your budget. Go for Sony camcorders. They are the best.
sagar_coolx
Feb 10, 2006 at 12:04 PM
panasonic ones r gud 2.
i cant specify the xact model, but whatever u buy,make sure the recording medium is a mini -dv tape.
it offers the best resolution personal videocams can offer. sony 1's r costly tho......i guess bcoz the have touch screen,which i think is not needed unless ur gonna use it alongwith atm,s.
zombie
zombie #4
Feb 10, 2006 at 12:48 PM
Sony has always this properitary problems. It uses digital 8 or some format like that. And the touch screen may be available in some high-end models. I have a Panasonic camcorder though.
PainKiller
Feb 10, 2006 at 6:52 PM
how im gonna transfer my recorded stuff to my pc. is usb connectivity is provided in sony/panasonic??

what r the decent specs for a camcorder w.r.t. megapixel n optical zoom? does still photos r also saved onto the mini-dv??
S
saiaspire #6
Feb 10, 2006 at 8:20 PM
Pana

USB and Firewire are provided in Panasonic. Dunno abt Sony
sagar_coolx
Feb 12, 2006 at 1:10 PM
no u have to insert a memory card for saving photos ,,but the pics on a camcorder are almost useless.no quality whatsoever.
i suggest u use it for only its main purpose i.e. movie making
PainKiller
Feb 14, 2006 at 4:09 PM
suggest me a camcorder (i mean model name n brand). which has all the features that r required n decent performace.
actually, i never used a camcorder b4 so dont know abt what features are required :)
shaunak
shaunak #9
Feb 14, 2006 at 7:26 PM
Samsung.
check the fetures on their website.
they have 2 models in ur price range.
both use hi8 media
J
janitha #10
Feb 16, 2006 at 9:38 PM
PainKiller said:
suggest me a camcorder (i mean model name n brand). which has all the features that r required n decent performace.
actually, i never used a camcorder b4 so dont know abt what features are required :)

First, buy one with Mini DV Format only. (since with your budget you may not be able buy one with Mini DVD or a 3CCD one). Second, as almost everybody says, Sony is definitely best. Price is of course higher but for clear reasons like better quality, Carl Zeiss Lens, Infolithium battery (which shows remaining time etc. in the panel), better support service etc. I am using a Sony HC-15 and is fully satisfied with it.

V.Prem Kumar
yash
yash #11
Feb 16, 2006 at 11:09 PM
why dont u go for canon? its as good as sony and cheaper
J
janitha #12
Feb 17, 2006 at 7:27 AM
yash said:
why dont u go for canon? its as good as sony and cheaper

Canon is of course good and can be the second choice but almost everybody prefers Sony for obvious reasons. (In case of Still cameras, Canon is considered best for both Digital and Film for which I also use Canon ones only)

V.Prem Kumar
zombie
zombie #13
Feb 17, 2006 at 1:23 PM
I agree with you buddy. I am going to get a Canon L2IS soon enough. Cant wait.
J
janitha #14
Feb 17, 2006 at 1:53 PM
zombie said:
I agree with you buddy. I am going to get a Canon L2IS soon enough. Cant wait.

Is that model a handycam or digi Still?

V.Prem Kumar
zombie
zombie #15
Feb 17, 2006 at 3:03 PM
Thats a still camera. If you have seen Powershot ad featuring Maria, then its the one she uses to click the picture.
Ankur Gupta
Feb 17, 2006 at 3:58 PM
Hey zombie wat is the cost of Canon L2IS and u buying it from indian market or from abroad?
and btw is sony DSC-P200 a gud cam to invest in????
J
janitha #17
Feb 17, 2006 at 6:43 PM
zombie said:
Thats a still camera. If you have seen Powershot ad featuring Maria, then its the one she uses to click the picture.

From what I could find, Canon L2 is a Hi-8 Handicam and not a still one

V.Prem Kumar
H
Feb 17, 2006 at 6:55 PM
JVC d520 price 19k good entry level Camcorder according to BetterPhotography
J
janitha #19
Feb 18, 2006 at 12:43 AM
hellomotto said:
JVC d520 price 19k good entry level Camcorder according to BetterPhotography

only if it is Mini DV! Otherwise you may find it difficult to transfer, edit etc. Of course you can do it even otherwise, using capture cards but with loss of quality.

V.Prem Kumar
photon
photon #20
Feb 19, 2006 at 6:18 PM
Go for Panasonic NV GS 35
PainKiller
Feb 20, 2006 at 8:27 PM
again too many choices...if u guyz can throw some light on the features of these models...then it wud b more beneficial for me :) but thnx once again 4 ur replies
zegulas
zegulas #22
Feb 21, 2006 at 12:23 AM
Dude, I own the Panasonic NV-GS35 and it simply rocks!!!
It has 30X optical zoom, 1000X digital zoom, Colour night mode feature,
it uses the SD card for storing photos and can store upto 1000 images at its best quality on a 128MB SD Card.
It cost me Rs 30,000 when I bought it.
The video quality is simply superb (1000 times better than any DVD videos can be compared to HDTV) 8) :wink:
J
janitha #23
Feb 21, 2006 at 8:25 AM
zegulas said:
Dude, I own the Panasonic NV-GS35 and it simply rocks!!!
It has 30X optical zoom, 1000X digital zoom, Colour night mode feature,
it uses the SD card for storing photos and can store upto 1000 images at its best quality on a 128MB SD Card.
It cost me Rs 30,000 when I bought it.
The video quality is simply superb (1000 times better than any DVD videos can be compared to HDTV) 8) :wink:

I have not used this particular model and you may be right generally but -

Who will use 30 X Zoom even if optical, even rarely?
The stills (1000 images) will be worse than those from the cheapest digital still camera. (it is the same with most of the camcorders)
How can the Mini DV be 1000 times better than DVD quality?
Finally the price should be muche less nowadays since it has been coming down steeply for quite some time.
Anyway I think the particular brand has Leica lens which has good optics.

V.Prem Kumar
zombie
zombie #24
Feb 21, 2006 at 9:02 AM
janitha said:
From what I could find, Canon L2 is a Hi-8 Handicam and not a still one

Well all I can say is, it was my bad. Its S2IS and not L2IS.

And Ankur I'll get it from Japan. 22k for camera, battery charger and 512MB SDcard. Not a bad deal at all.
J
janitha #25
Feb 21, 2006 at 5:29 PM
zombie said:
janitha said:
From what I could find, Canon L2 is a Hi-8 Handicam and not a still one

Well all I can say is, it was my bad. Its S2IS and not L2IS.

And Ankur I'll get it from Japan. 22k for camera, battery charger and 512MB SDcard. Not a bad deal at all.

It is availavble at Bombay where jjmehta quotes a price of Rs.25250 including 512 MB SD card, 4 NiMH charger and pouch with 3 months warranty from their side. (as seen from thier website)

Anyway, being a canon it should give you superb results. And the optical zoom is a fantastic 12x. (though you may never use it at that range. My Coolpix has 8X but such long range I have never used during the past 3 years eventhough wildlife photography is one of my pastimes.)
Happy shooting
V.Prem Kumar
zegulas
zegulas #26
Feb 21, 2006 at 10:48 PM
janitha said:
I have not used this particular model and you may be right generally but -

Who will use 30 X Zoom even if optical, even rarely?
The stills (1000 images) will be worse than those from the cheapest digital still camera. (it is the same with most of the camcorders)
How can the Mini DV be 1000 times better than DVD quality?
Finally the price should be muche less nowadays since it has been coming down steeply for quite some time.
Anyway I think the particular brand has Leica lens which has good optics.

V.Prem Kumar

Dude 1000 times better, doesn't mean literally "1000 times". But yes, I found it to be more better than DVD videos. And also the image quality provided by the camcorder is very good, but the resolution is small (0.8MP), but the 'quality' is better than most of the common digital cameras! :p
J
janitha #27
Feb 21, 2006 at 11:06 PM
zegulas said:
janitha said:
I have not used this particular model and you may be right generally but -

Who will use 30 X Zoom even if optical, even rarely?
The stills (1000 images) will be worse than those from the cheapest digital still camera. (it is the same with most of the camcorders)
How can the Mini DV be 1000 times better than DVD quality?
Finally the price should be muche less nowadays since it has been coming down steeply for quite some time.
Anyway I think the particular brand has Leica lens which has good optics.

V.Prem Kumar

Dude 1000 times better, doesn't mean literally "1000 times". But yes, I found it to be more better than DVD videos. And also the image quality provided by the camcorder is very good, but the resolution is small (0.8MP), but the 'quality' is better than most of the common digital cameras! :p

The resolution in case of DVD is 720x480 and I don't think an ordinary Mini DV can match it. I am not very sure and hope somebody who know better will clarify. Anyway I have never seen a Mini DV video better than a DVD.
BTW by way of comparison, I meant Mini DV and DVD and not DVD Camcorder.

V.Prem Kumar