Preview:
PRISM, and now this. I'm happy for the fact that at least it's not happening under the hood as PRISM. Still, do we need to worry ?
Why ?
> No rules, regulations or whatever have been defined or stated, to clear the boundaries of the intriguing CMS.
> Officials beholding the power will not be needing any kind of court orders or warrants, which were earlier mandatory, to proceed with any kind of surveillance. This creates the biggest question !! Judiciary is the only thing left in our country on which we can trust and if any agency/personnel can have the power to bypass it, then only god can stop him, at least his self-conscience can't. Power spoils, period.
> Though govt has been saying CMS won't be invading privacy, but the way CMS is being implemented, the question over privacy concerns are natural and inevitable. And no clear answers have been given regarding this.
Till now, only nine agencies - the Intelligence Bureau, Central Bureau of Investigation, Economic Intelligence Bureau, the Directorate of Revenue, Income Tax Department, Defence Intelligence Agency, Narcotics Control Bureau and the National Investigation Agency - are permitted by law, under the Telegraph Act of 1885 and the Information Technology Act of 2008, to covertly perform electronic surveillance, including telephone tapping, over their targets.
Count one more, NTRO, a surveillance specific agency directly under PMO.
Let me tell you some hilarious history of the notorious NTRO.
Why not to worry ?
> The pace at which terrorism and other crimes are increasing, and more importantly, their easy escaping (because its INDIA), we need an centrally organised system which can keep a track over all of the things.
> I, personally, am even fine with a bit of privacy breach if the original motto (crime_crackdown, if at all it is) is fulfilled.
> AK47/M4 vs .22 Caliber guns ? The GenX/Y/Z uses the latest tech to form every moment of their life, and the same with criminals. WiFi breach and its outcomes are just a trailer. So India has also geared itself to be self-reliant in cyber (war) arena and the first bullet is fired. CMS, upcoming Cyber Security Framework / Cyber Security Policy along with National Cyber Coordination Centre, et al are initiatives. And they may "actually" build the image of India as a true IT giant.
In a way, it seems the demand of the time, if only implemented in a correct way. But this "if" always spoils the party. I sincerely hope, this time, it doesn't.
What are your thoughts ?
PS: I have mixed many topics into one, can't really stick to one while contemplating over it.
PRISM, and now this. I'm happy for the fact that at least it's not happening under the hood as PRISM. Still, do we need to worry ?
Why ?
> No rules, regulations or whatever have been defined or stated, to clear the boundaries of the intriguing CMS.
> Officials beholding the power will not be needing any kind of court orders or warrants, which were earlier mandatory, to proceed with any kind of surveillance. This creates the biggest question !! Judiciary is the only thing left in our country on which we can trust and if any agency/personnel can have the power to bypass it, then only god can stop him, at least his self-conscience can't. Power spoils, period.
> Though govt has been saying CMS won't be invading privacy, but the way CMS is being implemented, the question over privacy concerns are natural and inevitable. And no clear answers have been given regarding this.
Till now, only nine agencies - the Intelligence Bureau, Central Bureau of Investigation, Economic Intelligence Bureau, the Directorate of Revenue, Income Tax Department, Defence Intelligence Agency, Narcotics Control Bureau and the National Investigation Agency - are permitted by law, under the Telegraph Act of 1885 and the Information Technology Act of 2008, to covertly perform electronic surveillance, including telephone tapping, over their targets.
Count one more, NTRO, a surveillance specific agency directly under PMO.
Let me tell you some hilarious history of the notorious NTRO.
Why not to worry ?
> The pace at which terrorism and other crimes are increasing, and more importantly, their easy escaping (because its INDIA), we need an centrally organised system which can keep a track over all of the things.
> I, personally, am even fine with a bit of privacy breach if the original motto (crime_crackdown, if at all it is) is fulfilled.
> AK47/M4 vs .22 Caliber guns ? The GenX/Y/Z uses the latest tech to form every moment of their life, and the same with criminals. WiFi breach and its outcomes are just a trailer. So India has also geared itself to be self-reliant in cyber (war) arena and the first bullet is fired. CMS, upcoming Cyber Security Framework / Cyber Security Policy along with National Cyber Coordination Centre, et al are initiatives. And they may "actually" build the image of India as a true IT giant.
In a way, it seems the demand of the time, if only implemented in a correct way. But this "if" always spoils the party. I sincerely hope, this time, it doesn't.
What are your thoughts ?
PS: I have mixed many topics into one, can't really stick to one while contemplating over it.