DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

CRYSIS Demo is playable on Intel Onboard X3000 [G965 MB]

47 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/crysis-demo-is-playable-on-intel-onboard-x3000-g965-mb.71837/

yesh1683
yesh1683 Original post #1
Oct 28, 2007 at 3:56 PM
Today I downloaded CRYSIS demo and it is playable at 800x600 at low settings,,
BUT some particles graphics are corrupted and the some objects are rendred late and also some parts of the weapons and nano suit are missing,, but frame rate is playable [ocassionally it drops very low],,,

i am sure future drivers can fix this problem,,**FARCRY was also having same problem and with new drivers it played very smooth**

and also i am having only 1GB DDR2 533 ram and on Tuesday i am getting 1GB DDR2 667 Ram 2 sticks i will connect it in dual channel mode and see the difference,,

I am really surpriced that i was able to play the game bcoz the EA perticularly listed as integrated chipsets are not supported:rolleyes::rolleyes:

if i press detect optimum settings all settings will b set to medium and resolution to 1024

I am running it on XP 32 bit
I am having 64 bit Vista and try to run the game on that bcoz crysis performance increases on 64 bit OS
baccilus
Oct 28, 2007 at 6:09 PM
Then it should also run on my 8500GT
bikdel
bikdel #3
Oct 28, 2007 at 6:29 PM
^^^ lol of corse it will run...

@yesh

hey did you try it out in lowest settings? or something more than that?

also tell me the performance @ 640 x 480... if thats suported though!!

Also do try to mpost some screenshots... we wanna know how crysis looks with the low end hardware :))
Faun
Faun #4
Oct 29, 2007 at 12:09 AM
x3000 bangs until i get PS3.
RCuber
RCuber #5
Oct 29, 2007 at 12:17 AM
^^ Crysis wont be available on consoles any time soon :(
abhijit_reddevil
Oct 29, 2007 at 12:02 PM
Will it be playable on 1024 X 768 with my 6800GS 256 MB and AMD 3000+ (2.25Ghz) and 2 GB RAM? I have win XP SP2.
S
Oct 29, 2007 at 12:08 PM
will it run on high setings on my pc on 64 bit vista??
bikdel
bikdel #8
Oct 29, 2007 at 11:37 PM
^^^ must be dreaming lately...

no high settings dude...

but you can expect it to run @ mid @ 1024x768
The_Devil_Himself
Oct 29, 2007 at 11:48 PM
atombomb: arre 9800 tab tak launch ho jayega(most probably).That card will play this game at highest of settings.
bikdel
bikdel #10
Oct 30, 2007 at 12:52 AM
^^^ 8800 GT 512 MB (G92) according to reviwers is able to play this game @ highest settings with no visually noticable FSP glitches......... :))

it has just launched but read a review done on 23rd Oct...

its way better than 8800 GTS 640 :p nad possibly cheaper
yesh1683
yesh1683 #11
Oct 30, 2007 at 4:02 PM
bikdel said:
^^^ lol of corse it will run...

@yesh

hey did you try it out in lowest settings? or something more than that?

also tell me the performance @ 640 x 480... if thats suported though!!

Also do try to mpost some screenshots... we wanna know how crysis looks with the low end hardware :))

There is no lowest setting available and also no 640

Sure will post the low setting screenshots

BTW did the benchmark on my windows XP 64 bit :D
AVG FPS 12
MIN FPS 4
MAX FPS 28
ambar.hitman
Oct 30, 2007 at 5:18 PM
duh...12 fps aint playable,post screenshots also,lets see how horrible can crysis look,lol
bikdel
bikdel #13
Oct 30, 2007 at 6:53 PM
@ yesh

hey.... in your opinion, is it playable??

and are those results with 1 gb ddr 667 in dual channel or your old 533 one??
ambar.hitman
Oct 31, 2007 at 3:22 PM
how can 12 fps be playable? It will be a slide show
Faun
Faun #15
Oct 31, 2007 at 4:14 PM
ambar.hitman said:
how can 12 fps be playable? It will be a slide show

the bullet-time effect, i luv that:D

Though not for the entire gameplay:(
T
Tech_Wiz #16
Nov 2, 2007 at 9:30 AM
What FPS is consideredplayable?

ps: I think I wont be having probs with Crysis on my 8600 GT 256MB @ 1024x768 with most visual effects turned on :D
yesh1683
yesh1683 #17
Nov 3, 2007 at 2:27 PM
I dont know abt others but 12 FPS is playable to some extent it doesnot look like slide show bcoz i have completed the demo [and also i get almost same FPS in 1024x768 resolution @ low settings:confused:]

the results are with my new 2 gb ddr2 677 in dual channel

BTW in 64 bit VISTA I got poor performance the FPS remained same but game freezes and sometimes restarts

the the games graphics are corrupted the nano suit and guns textures are lost or rendered incorrectly and while playing the whole game the extra hand is rendered at the top of the screen :confused::confused:

My guess is it will b fixed in future driver update


BTW here are the screenshots from my sytem at 800x600 at low settings off the course the some textures are rendered incorrectly



*img13.imagevenue.com/loc864/th_79301_Crysis_2007-11-02_12-19-07-07_122_864lo.jpg*img22.imagevenue.com/loc1154/th_79306_Crysis_2007-11-02_12-19-20-01_122_1154lo.jpg*img157.imagevenue.com/loc1089/th_79311_Crysis_2007-11-02_12-28-29-62_122_1089lo.jpg*img178.imagevenue.com/loc182/th_79316_Crysis_2007-11-02_12-28-48-75_122_182lo.jpg
*img109.imagevenue.com/loc972/th_79316_Crysis_2007-11-02_12-29-03-03_122_972lo.jpg*img161.imagevenue.com/loc1135/th_79321_Crysis_2007-11-02_12-31-09-42_122_1135lo.jpg*img178.imagevenue.com/loc438/th_79326_Crysis_2007-11-02_12-36-16-35_122_438lo.jpg
*img162.imagevenue.com/loc1081/th_79327_Crysis_2007-11-02_12-52-52-40_122_1081lo.jpg*img131.imagevenue.com/loc352/th_79335_Crysis_2007-11-02_13-16-56-76_122_352lo.jpg*img11.imagevenue.com/loc744/th_79340_Crysis_2007-11-02_13-31-14-71_122_744lo.jpg



bikdel
bikdel #18
Nov 3, 2007 at 2:39 PM
^^^ looking at those screenshots i wont be trying CRYSIS anytime soon unless i get a good graphics card...

i mean its all rendered oddly.. anyways looking forward to try it!!
yesh1683
yesh1683 #19
Nov 3, 2007 at 9:25 PM
Low Fps is also due to my procy i think
Because crysis minimum requirement says core2duo 2.0 and mine is only core2duo 1.8:confused::confused:
Never thaught mine procy would b outdated so soon
Third Eye
Third Eye #20
Nov 3, 2007 at 9:30 PM
yesh1683 said:
Low Fps is also due to my procy i think
Because crysis minimum requirement says core2duo 2.0 and mine is only core2duo 1.8:confused::confused:


Crysis require minimum P4 3.2 GHz.
deathvirus_me
Nov 3, 2007 at 10:07 PM
bikdel said:
^^^ looking at those screenshots i wont be trying CRYSIS anytime soon unless i get a good graphics card...

i mean its all rendered oddly.. anyways looking forward to try it!!

Its not the game .. its the gpu ... :rolleyes: was thinking to post how crysis looks even on my old 7950gt .. ;)
bikdel
bikdel #22
Nov 3, 2007 at 11:50 PM
^^^ o-corse i kno that its the GPU...
i was saying that if that was the case with gma x3000, whats gonna come out of my FX 5200.. lol..

will enjoy a nice slideshow with overly-exaggerating-bullet-time-effect :))
s18000rpm
s18000rpm #23
Nov 4, 2007 at 12:39 AM
i thought you ran away :|

anyways, dont spam here.

if you have anything to contribute, then do so, otherwise go use your gfx. card & Quad Core.
dOm1naTOr
dOm1naTOr #24
Nov 4, 2007 at 1:09 AM
This guy is here too.....the ONE with 8800GTX!
Hi gamer, sorry we were trying to play crysis..our mistake.
Why are u still lurkin around in dis forum if it not meant for Gamerz like u?

And we're proud to call ourselves INDIANS, unlike u.
gaurav_indian
Nov 4, 2007 at 1:34 AM
shrapnel said:
Ahh.... me old pal, Aravindaaaa, the SERIOUS UT fragger:D
Didn't you read my post ? I come here to read funny, hilarious posts; certainly not for any SERIOUS discussion on Gaming;)
haan haan kyu nahi.Hum bhi tumhe miss kar rahe thay.:D Aur delhi mein baitha hai aur style aise maarta hai jaise new york mein ho.:D
dOm1naTOr
dOm1naTOr #26
Nov 4, 2007 at 1:35 AM
Guys like dis are keeping this forum alive. Its a fun:D
gaurav_indian
Nov 4, 2007 at 1:38 AM
aravind_n20 said:
Guys like dis are keeping this forum alive. Its a fun:D
hehe abey hata sawaan ki ghata hum hum hai baaki sab paani kam hai.:D
yesh1683
yesh1683 #28
Nov 4, 2007 at 3:18 AM
Third Eye said:
Crysis require minimum P4 3.2 GHz.

single core minimum 3.2
Dual core minimum 2.0


U
Nov 4, 2007 at 12:11 PM
will it be playable on Nvidia 6150 onboard graphics?
and if not then on 8600GT?
zyberboy
zyberboy #30
Nov 4, 2007 at 12:42 PM
sharpnel u really need a cat scan
whats ur age?
shantanu
shantanu #31
Nov 4, 2007 at 1:47 PM
shrapnel ! all your posts are removed from this forum. try not to spam, or BAN will come the next time. one more of spam post.. members please do report if he comes back with his spams..
yesh1683
yesh1683 #32
Nov 4, 2007 at 8:26 PM
upendra_gp said:
will it be playable on Nvidia 6150 onboard graphics?
and if not then on 8600GT?

8600 GT will play crysis at high settings but not everything turned on and not at high resolutions it will good at 1024x768

Not sure abt 6150 and i am certainly intrested in knowing how it performs
So any 6150 users post the results:D
H
Harvik780 #33
Nov 4, 2007 at 8:40 PM
^^I have XFX 8600GT SLI and the demo does not perform well with everything set to high except Volumetric Clouds(medium).19-27 FPS average.
My 3D mark score is 8198 and I have the second highest score with this config compared to other similar configs on 3D mark official site.
RCuber
RCuber #34
Nov 4, 2007 at 8:42 PM
^^is it the 8600's fault? and that too you are running it on SLI :| .. how does it perform in vista.. I guess you have vista 64..
H
Harvik780 #35
Nov 4, 2007 at 8:54 PM
^^Most games are more than playable at 720p with 2xAA and 8xAF.I haven't tested 3DMark in vista x64.I have Dual Boot config for Xp(x86) and vista(x64).The Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare Demo Runs faster in vista x64 than in Xp x86.
If ur thinking of buying a GFX card go for 8800GTS 320MB.I just bought this system to boast SLI :D .I am going to buy another 8800GTS 640MB in the next 1 and a half months and will set it for SLI with my brother's config.Currently i am looking to buy two similar VGA coolers for my Dual 8600GT and will try to Set to 700Mhz and get over 9000 in 3D Mark06 in XP.
Stalker
Stalker #36
Nov 4, 2007 at 8:58 PM
^^hold on, isnt the G92 based 8800GTS coming soon? It is supposed to have 128 shaders....similar to the G80 8800GTX. u can get that instead

& the 8800GTS 320 mb? isnt it replaced by the 8800GT
H
Harvik780 #37
Nov 4, 2007 at 9:04 PM
^^I thought the G92 based 8800GTS was going to have 112SPs as confirmed by BFG.
8800GTS 320MB will cost him less than 8800GT 512 MB.And going for the 256MB version of 8800GT is not an option.

Edit : Just found its going to be 128SPs.
Stalker
Stalker #38
Nov 4, 2007 at 9:16 PM
^^the 8800GT has 112 shaders.....the G92 GTS will have 128 shaders.....thats what i've read
H
Harvik780 #39
Nov 4, 2007 at 9:19 PM
New 8800GTS G80(640MB)-112SPs
New 8800GTS G92(512MB,8800GT with more SPs)-128 SPs
bikdel
bikdel #40
Nov 4, 2007 at 10:44 PM
s18000rpm said:
i thought you ran away :|

anyways, dont spam here.

if you have anything to contribute, then do so, otherwise go use your gfx. card & Quad Core.


whos talking about a quad core?... i am squezing myslef with a celeron and FX 5200.. lolz...

and i hate being called a spammer :(

aravind_n20 said:
This guy is here too.....the ONE with 8800GTX!
Hi gamer, sorry we were trying to play crysis..our mistake.
Why are u still lurkin around in dis forum if it not meant for Gamerz like u?

And we're proud to call ourselves INDIANS, unlike u.

what the FU<K?? gone crazy guys... helLOOOoooOOOoooOO

hes not here that shrapnel or whatever...
Third Eye
Third Eye #41
Nov 4, 2007 at 10:46 PM
bikdel said:
whos talking about a quad core?... i am squezing myslef with a celeron and FX 5200.. lolz...

and i hate being called a spammer :(



what the FU<K?? gone crazy guys... helLOOOoooOOOoooOO

hes not here that shrapnel or whatever...
They were not saying that to you. :mrgreen:
zyberboy
zyberboy #42
Nov 4, 2007 at 10:49 PM
^^yeah LOL sharpnel's post was deleted by shantanu
bikdel
bikdel #43
Nov 4, 2007 at 10:49 PM
OHHH.... yeah my bad... just read the moderators post that all comments have been removed....

WTH.. they should have atleast mentioned in every post with red color as DELETED..

anyways fooled :))
bikdel
bikdel #44
Nov 5, 2007 at 4:22 PM
Errm SHANTANU!!... i guess you have some more job to do... :))
Faun
Faun #45
Nov 5, 2007 at 7:17 PM
bikdel said:
Errm SHANTANU!!... i guess you have some more job to do... :))

Well he needs redemption:)):D:))
shantanu
shantanu #46
Nov 6, 2007 at 11:06 AM
"shrapnel" user banned for SPAMMING and unusual behavior.
bikdel
bikdel #47
Nov 7, 2007 at 11:08 AM
^^ +1 :))