DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Crysis Review

49 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/crysis-review.73410/

H
Harvik780 Original post #1
Nov 17, 2007 at 6:15 AM

Crysis is here and We have a brief review.

Gameplay is important.....graphics should be good...story strong and inspiring.But all only if the game performs better on average pcs and by that i don't mean what nvidia says average but what a gamer thinks is average for him which should at least run the game at "High" if not "Very High" with at least 4xAA.

Crysis the most anticipated First Person Shooter of 2007 doesn't quiet fit into the category of games with good performance.That crowns taken by HL2 series,Bioshock and some others but not CRYSIS yes not CRYSIS.

I have two decent rigs.One which scores 9450 and the other which scores 9650 in 3DMark 06.Both can be said to be todays midrange.But talk about high end ones.Yes the ones with SLI and Quad Core and ubers of ram.This game has poor support for SLI(heard a patch will be soon ou to improve SLI performance) and I wonder what this game was made to run on.....wait i know....a TIME MACHINE through which a gamer could just jump into the future and play on a 0.55nm fabricated chip which would cost less and perform 100times faster than current processors.

Graphics[10/10] -
This game pushes it beyond the limits of current gen.The graphics show the next-gen consoles the flat floor.With intense use of post processing(sun shafts AKA god rays),shaders,shadow effects(ultra soft shadows),particles(soft particles),volumetric effects,high res textures and vast environments with excellent Draw distance.These screens will pretty much say it all.

*img263.imageshack.us/img263/6927/image009kk8.jpg *img101.imageshack.us/img101/224/image012mg9.jpg *img523.imageshack.us/img523/8131/image016fj3.jpg

*img523.imageshack.us/img523/992/image020up0.jpg *img523.imageshack.us/img523/3300/image021fd6.jpg *img523.imageshack.us/img523/5148/image033sg0.jpg

*img527.imageshack.us/img527/4218/image041bm8.jpg *img527.imageshack.us/img527/7956/image042dt1.jpg *img523.imageshack.us/img523/4207/image043un8.jpg

*img99.imageshack.us/img99/6692/image044ax2.jpg *img523.imageshack.us/img523/439/image045bo1.jpg *img99.imageshack.us/img99/6266/image046tg6.jpg




Gameplay[8/10] -
The game is pretty much a pi$$ off at normal and low difficulty.At normal difficulty I completed 4 levels just running and gunning ok not quiet gunning just running and some swimming.My brother completed the first two levels easily by just getting prone in clock an recharging when necessary.Gameplay physics have some major flaws.Dead bodies do not respond to gunfire.Birds are brave enough when u come up to them.Though they are so delicate that they die after u throw them when picked up.Just launch a grenade in before a cut scene and it messes up the whole display.Enemy and friendly AI is cr/\p at normal difficulty.Ur tactical ammo can take 10 seconds to reload but hey just change the fire mode in 3secs and switch back to tactical ammo and its reloaded in no time...magic.The Koreans in nano suit are total freaks jumping here and there so that you can spot'em easily.Hey but all that is what differentiates between a game and real life.Also its you who decides how he plays it...Run and Gun...Stealth...or combo art..Even in bioshock u could do stupid things if not using ur plasmid powers properly.
I would suggest that even casual gamers at least start with Hard difficulty.Probably crytek got a lot of complaints regarding the difficulty settings in Farcry.But ur facilitated with the real time dynamic option to change the difficulty which obviously indicates that there are no alternate endings.Top notch accessories provided like the nano-suit and customizable weapons.At least the gameplay is not that scripted which digs it out of its grave.

You can be a mass murderer at normal difficulty

*img523.imageshack.us/img523/9848/image040sv1.jpg


Sound[9/10] -
Voice acting has been nicely done.The game has good support for surround channel audio.Surround channel experience is important for this game as the environments u'll encounter will be both open and closed.Pin-pointing an enemy with nano-suit will be facilitated with surround audio when he's in cloak mode.

Story[10/10] -
Excellent and inspiring,which grips the player to playing this game.I don't want to give any spoilers out :D.

Performance[6/10] -
This game is a very poor performer.On my Geforce 8600GT Brutality SLI i can't even turn on true AA and have to use eDgeAA 2.The first level runs very smooth on my 8600GT Brutality SLI with true AA turned off.So does it on my brothers 8800GTS 640MB with 4x true AA turned on.It mostly runs smoothly on High settings only at a resolution of 1024*768 which is not even HD.Others levels performed poorly on my 8600GT SLI.Maybe due to some memory management issues(i was using XP 32-BIT).On the other hand Gears Of War ran perfectly smooth at more than 62FPS(locked).On 1280*800 with everything set to high in DirectX 9.The most important GFX settings in this game are post processing,shadows and shaders of which enabling shaders to high takes a major performance hit.

Overall[8.6/10]
Recommended if you have a decent enough rig to play this game.

I would like to inform users that this game will not run smooth on 8800GT whereas Cevat Yerli said that it would but he only does it for money(who does not).
Who
Who #2
Nov 17, 2007 at 6:36 AM
i read the whole review i agree with everything except for 10/10 out in the story , i think it derserves 8/10 in story IMO, but anyways really a great review in the end , i hope you will be reviewing future games like gears of war, also why don't make a thread PC games review & if possible get that thread stickied, anyway excellent work.
H
Nov 17, 2007 at 6:49 AM
Thanks,i think ur right.
BTW crysis was released to boost sales for 8800GT.Nvidia had already decided it long time ago.Crytek has been paid by nvidia.
W
Nov 17, 2007 at 11:08 AM
what about FPS in 1920x1200 with everything maxed?
Would it be playable?
8800GT. 3GHZ DC. 2GB .16MB cache HDD.
Who
Who #5
Nov 17, 2007 at 12:01 PM
No
entrana
entrana #6
Nov 18, 2007 at 6:57 PM
harvick bhai apna man bana. tune to kaha tha game bakwaas hain
H
Nov 18, 2007 at 10:23 PM
^^I got paid by crytek :D and that's damn true :D :D
I'll be posting the pics of aliens........just wait.
entrana
entrana #8
Nov 25, 2007 at 11:50 AM
sure u got paid by crytek..
H
Hitboxx #9
Nov 25, 2007 at 2:44 PM
Is it me or the graphics of CoD4 appear much more sweeter than these screenshots? [Oopsie the images turned up large, thought they were smaller :p]

*xbox360media.ign.com/xbox360/image/article/811/811393/call-of-duty-4-modern-warfare-20070807114555689-000.jpg*www.xboxworld.com.au/uploads/xbox-360/screenshots/call_of_duty_4_modern_warfare_3033.jpg*www.xboxworld.com.au/uploads/xbox-360/screenshots/call_of_duty_4_modern_warfare_3032.jpg*www.xboxworld.com.au/uploads/xbox-360/screenshots/call_of_duty_4_modern_warfare_2888.jpg

For more screenshots, go here
nvidia
nvidia #10
Nov 25, 2007 at 2:59 PM
@harvik780: Super Review. Thanks a lot.. Ill be getting the game tomorrow..
xbonez
xbonez #11
Nov 25, 2007 at 3:39 PM
started playing today. game is pretty gud. concept of the suit and its powers are really fun
entrana
entrana #12
Nov 25, 2007 at 3:41 PM
the game gets lame man. u practically cant die
dOm1naTOr
dOm1naTOr #13
Nov 25, 2007 at 3:49 PM
@entrana
just try playing @ hard or delta. In delta, u probably won't get time to breath:D
goobimama
goobimama #14
Nov 25, 2007 at 3:50 PM
@widescreen: Kind of sucky eh! Get a nice huge monitor and you find out you have to play all your games on such a high resolution!
W
Nov 25, 2007 at 5:46 PM
a square of 1600x1200 cant beat what 1920x1200 offers specially for a scenic beauty of Crysis.

what 3d do u use?
goobimama
goobimama #16
Nov 25, 2007 at 6:00 PM
If you are asking about my graphics card, then it's a 7900GT 256MB. But I hear my CPU/RAM is the bottleneck (P4 3Ghz + 1GB RAM)

the game gets lame man. u practically cant die
The review mentioned that the difficulty settings are a bit too easy to begin with. Did you try the high difficulty setting?
deathvirus_me
Nov 25, 2007 at 6:31 PM
Crysis is a graphical marvel with lame a** story , and though the game gives the player a lot of freedom during the initial levels , later its pretty much another run and gun .. and this game really boosts the texture vram overloading problem of the 8800's :( ... plus the final boss was like so daammm easy even in delta mode :( ... chalo .. anyway .. overall , not a 9 but something around 8/10 ..

Runs fine on my rig btw .. 1280*1024 , very high on XP , and loads of tweaks regarding visuals and performance ...
goobimama
goobimama #18
Nov 25, 2007 at 6:43 PM
As long as it looks mindblowing!
W
Nov 25, 2007 at 10:40 PM
@gobimamma when u planning to upgrade?

@deathvirus_me ---plz explain :texture vram overloading problem of the 8800.
entrana
entrana #20
Nov 26, 2007 at 7:12 AM
hey how did u set it on very high
deathvirus_me
Nov 26, 2007 at 5:54 PM
W i d e S c r e e N said:
@deathvirus_me ---plz explain :texture vram overloading problem of the 8800.
Well , in certain games , it may happen that some unnecessary data is not unloaded from the vram , thus occupying unecessary space. . even with 512 MB cards , it might happen that the total vram usage actually reached over the limit of the physical vram , i.e. 512 MB .. in such a case , the data that was supposed to be stored on the vram is now shifted to the RAM , which is a hell lot slower than the vram .. so this results in stutterings and slowdowns quite often .. the only way out is the alt-tab out of the game , which flushes the vram , and then go back in the game ...

Though this may happen on any card , the effects are more noticeable on the 8 series ... with my 7950GT , while playing Stalker , vram usage often went upto ~550 MB , but i never noticed slowdowns .. stutterings/hitching yes , but not slowdowns .. but with the 8800GT , the fps actually dips ... infact in certain parts of Crysis , the fps went from ~32 to ~24 , and after alt-tab , back to ~32 :p ...

This problem is dependant on the game to quite an extent and is more noticeable in games which uses texture streaming , or any similar "streaming" techniques .. its like the engine totally forgets to unload the unnecessary things from the vram :p ...

And also , this is also a problem in the driver level ... and more dominant with 8800's .. this problem in more open terms is referred to as "memory leaks" :p ... only in this case its the vram and not the system ram .

But is still fail to understand why there is a performance slowdown instead of just stutterings :( ... never faced this problem with the 7950GT even when the vram usage went over the limit .. infact wit QTP3 , Oblivion avg. around 580 MB almost all the time :p ... no slowdowns .. just stutters :p .. something actually knew what to unload , when to unload ...

See : *forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?threadid=240317

For me , the only solution i could find for Crysis was to lower texture size to 1024 , from 2048 .. then the mem. usage maxed around ~490 .. no slowdowns ...

sam9s said:
@Deathvirus_me do you literally get the message "Video RAM Overload" while playing the game on everything maxed out.??

Naah .. but random slowdowns .. only solution is to alt-tab out , then reload the game :( ... irritating at certain times ... :mad: .. when will nvidia actually get a fix ..
H
Harvik780 #22
Nov 26, 2007 at 9:49 PM
I have XFX 8600 GT SLI and i also experienced very suspicious slowdowns.I'll check if ur solution works sam9s.I think the nvidia SLI memory leakage bug still persists.
deathvirus_me
Nov 27, 2007 at 12:08 AM
^^ only solution can come from nvidia i guess ... the only other way is to somehow make sure that no matter how high u put the settings , the vram usage stays below ur cards vram limit :( ..
W
Nov 27, 2007 at 3:13 AM
I get a "lot" of stutters with 78GT/256/1GB/4200+. whilst Splinter Cell Double Agent.

It's similar to when you have a dual core AMD and you havent patched windows with apt drivers.

Can we use third party drivers/are there any?

neat trick -atl+tab!
xbonez
xbonez #25
Nov 27, 2007 at 9:31 PM
@ all those who've played Crysis (entrana, harvik etc.):
Which gme did u prefer : Crysis or FEAR (at the time it had come out)

personally i prefered FEAR. not only is the story much more gripping, it is actually frightening too (unlike lots of others "horror" games). even the gfx and physics are awesome. in fact they're so aweosme that even today nearly an yr after its release, its gfx are comparable with the new games coming out
H
Harvik780 #26
Nov 27, 2007 at 9:36 PM
I have played and completed FEAR twice on normal and hard difficulty and i must say that fear was way better when it came out.The gameplay of FEAR was what I liked.Enemy AI top-notch by its standards.Its creepy cut-scenes where excellent.
xbonez
xbonez #27
Nov 27, 2007 at 9:40 PM
^^that game was really really creepy and scary..... its one of the rare games that actually deserved the horror tag.....and the story in the first game was awesome too....however in XP and PM the story sort of took a backseat
H
Harvik780 #28
Nov 27, 2007 at 9:43 PM
xbonez said:
however in XP and PM the story sort of took a backseat
That's because they spent little time and money in development.
xbonez
xbonez #29
Nov 27, 2007 at 10:43 PM
all three FEAR games were on the same engine, right?
kunwar
kunwar #30
Nov 27, 2007 at 10:45 PM
Hey Dude ,

It was really good review , But there is a suggestion !

Couldn't you post those Damn-Cool Screenshots in such a way that we ppl could open each screen in 1280*1024 resolution ?
goobimama
goobimama #31
Nov 27, 2007 at 10:45 PM
Fear is scary? Nice. I'll try it out then. I kinda liked the excitement that Doom 3 put me into (and i played it with iMac's built in speakers). Fear has 5.1 sound right?
xbonez
xbonez #32
Nov 27, 2007 at 11:38 PM
not sure about the 5.1 sound (99% yes), but hell yes, FEAR is scary. and not scary in the Doom or Quake type of way (aliens with a horribly botched up face-job popping up all over the place). its real horror
abhijit_reddevil
Nov 28, 2007 at 4:08 AM
Can anyone tell about Crysis's performance on a 8600GT @ 1024X768?
H
Harvik780 #34
Nov 28, 2007 at 6:23 AM
^^You'll have to turn everthing to medium to get playable framerates.
hahahari
hahahari #35
Nov 28, 2007 at 7:10 AM
It's similar to when you have a dual core AMD and you havent patched windows with apt drivers.

wat does that man?
Pls elaborate.
dOm1naTOr
dOm1naTOr #36
Nov 28, 2007 at 7:40 AM
@hahahari
X2 proccys needed to be patched with a small patch named 'AMD dual core optimiser' for some games. Otherwise there wud either be stuttered sometimes[GRAW,COD4] or will suffer from irregular speed ups/slowdowns during gameplay[Dirt].

The file is a very small download and most games whicg reqires it has the installation of it within the disc itself.
hahahari
hahahari #37
Nov 28, 2007 at 8:34 AM
hmm thnx buddy.Can you tell me where I can get it from the internet that is.

Thnx.

edit:got it
B
BULLZI #38
Nov 28, 2007 at 10:33 AM
@deathvirus

u didnt tell me the name of ur vendor from where u got the card 8800GT.
plz do reply.
rockthegod
Nov 29, 2007 at 8:09 AM
xbonez said:
@ all those who've played Crysis (entrana, harvik etc.):
Which gme did u prefer : Crysis or FEAR (at the time it had come out)

FEAR was an awesum game when I experienced it first but after some time it actually went boring.... !!! I couldnn't even complete the sequel of the game !!! :( IMO, Crysis is a much better game than FEAR with an amazing and unforgettable experience in all aspects of the game !!! I completed Crysis twice.... and in my list of all FPS games (all PC games), this is the best for me till date !!! :) Eagerly waiting for the second part of CRYSIS trilogy, Caveat Yerli has promised to unlock all the graphical prowess of CryEngine 2 in CRYSIS 2 and I think it was due to the current-gen hardware limitations that many graphical aspects of CryEngine II was not unlocked !!!!! :D :D
xbonez
xbonez #40
Nov 29, 2007 at 8:50 AM
^^Crysis is a trilogy??
rockthegod
Nov 29, 2007 at 8:58 AM
xbonez said:
^^Crysis is a trilogy??

Yeah.... a supposed trilogy in the making !!! I suppose you missed the extensive chat between Crysis developers and InCrysis crysis fan site a week ago.... Well, here u go.... its official !!! :) CLICK HERE TO READ INFO and CLICK HERE TO FOLLOW THE CHAT DETAILS
Stress on : PHOTOREALISTIC GAMING ..... Poor Poor "cutting-edge" Hardware !!!! Will get killed by a Software !!!! :D :D
faraaz
faraaz #42
Nov 30, 2007 at 3:35 PM
How well will this game run on the following config:

Intel C2D 2.2 GHz (T7500?)
2 GB RAM (667 MHz)
nVidia 8600 M GT at 700 MHz clock speed with 256 MB GDDR3 memory
160 GB 5400 rpm SATA (I know this is slow...)
Windows Vista Home Premium
And all the other stuff laptops usually have...

The machine I am talking about is an Asus G1S Laptop...comments relating to Crysis performance please!
dOm1naTOr
dOm1naTOr #43
Nov 30, 2007 at 4:40 PM
@faraaz
u can do @ 1298*960 everythin med. Use fraps nd the avg fps shud be above 25 or ideally around 30.
faraaz
faraaz #44
Nov 30, 2007 at 7:19 PM
How about 1024x768 ... can I do high at those settings?
dOm1naTOr
dOm1naTOr #45
Nov 30, 2007 at 9:34 PM
yup, all to high, but AA turned off.
j1n M@tt
j1n M@tt #46
Nov 30, 2007 at 9:42 PM
how well will Crysis run on this machine:

X2 4000+,Asus 690G mb,1GB RAM
xbonez
xbonez #47
Nov 30, 2007 at 10:05 PM
^^gfx card? if u're talking about onboard, then maybe 800x600 or 1024x768 but everything turned to low
dOm1naTOr
dOm1naTOr #48
Nov 30, 2007 at 10:14 PM
@j1n M@tt
*www.thinkdigit.com/forum/showthread.php?t=29063

will post some screenshots soon. Playing like slideshow if any of da effects are hiked up except physics[depends on proccy].:D
j1n M@tt
j1n M@tt #49
Nov 30, 2007 at 11:41 PM
hey xbonez,don't say so........the onboard X1250 is better than dat.

Wait 'n' see untill aravind_n20 post some screenshots.