diffrence between fx 4130 and fx 4100...?

A friend of mine wants to assemble a desktop.... he has 2 processor choices in his budget fx 4130(black edition) or fx 4100....fx 4130 has higer clock frequency than fx4100 but is still priced a bit low on flipkart....so just wanted to know which one will be a better choice...(he likes fps games,and has CAD projects) :razz:

...THANKS in advance...

get i3 3220 instead. I3 beats FX 4100. or get a10 5800k is short on budget for a graphic card.

If the Main Use is Gaming go with i3 or A10 5800K ...The A10 has the Fastest Integrated Graphics .. Also Post More Info and fill up this template.
www.thinkdigit.com/forum/pc-compone...new-pc-help-answer-these-questions-first.html

he kinda wants to buy amd cpu(so no i3).....also he has added a gpu in the budget....so my question is if a10 wud be better than 4100 and 4130 with a dedicated gpu....(some cpu intensive tasks and a little bit of gaming FPS games only)?

A10 5800k > fx 4130 > fx 4100 in every task

waht about 6300?

S

@flyingcow

You have been posting this in a lot of threads?? What gives??

Shiva

shivakanth.sujit said:
@flyingcow

You have been posting this in a lot of threads?? What gives??

Shiva

I just want to help people, and to spread the word

Plus I was very exited yesterday

flyingcow said:
waht about 6300?

Is it available in india?

Yes. Here AMD PROCESSOR FX 6300 BLACK EDITION

FX 4130 is just a slightly overclocked FX-4100 and based on same Bulldozer architecture, not based on Piledriver architecture like FX-4300. New FX-4130 also comes with a better cooler than the FX-4100. However, right now in India, both FX-4300 and FX-6300 have been launched. So grab obe of 'em.

Cilus said:
FX 4130 is just a slightly overclocked FX-4100 and based on same Bulldozer architecture, not based on Piledriver architecture like FX-4300. New FX-4130 also comes with a better cooler than the FX-4100. However, right now in India, both FX-4300 and FX-6300 have been launched. So grab obe of 'em.

thanks cilus... much appreciated.... hes now ready to buy fx6300... thank u all for advice
JUST one more question just want to know if benq rl2240h is a good monitor for budget?

AnandTech | Bench - CPU

AMD
*cdn.memegenerator.net/images/131882.jpg

If there's a choice between FX4300 and i3 3220.. go for i3..
The FX doesnt even beat the age old i3 2100 in some games
Id like to see a crysis 3 benchmark to verify tho
But if u can afford FX6300, then get it

As games are becoming more multi-threaded, a true quad core processor is being necessary for gaming. Check the Crysis 3 Benchmark where even a A10-5800K (It is an APU based on FX-4300 but lacks the 4 MB L3 cache and runs little slower) is beating all the Intel HT enabled dual core processors by a huge margin. So if the choice is between i3 3220 and FX-4300, I will go with the later with my eyes closed. However, if OP can spend little extra money, just get FX-6300. It simply doesn't have any competetion right now....

C

cut the crap go wid 6300 ...

S

Please avoid such language. Yes , go with the 6300.

Shiva

V

Get fx6300,apt for the workloads here,quite a good processor for the price and also quite fine for gaming.

As far as crysis 3 is concerned different sites have different results,as they have mostly tested on different parts.
Techspot's results would conclude fx4300 being better than i3 3220 but a tomshardware test results would show the things other way around.
In metro:last light test results from techspot,i3 3220 was a somewhat ahead of fx4320.
As of now between the fx4300 and i3 3220,they perform close with i3 3220 winning in more occasions,though generally close at 1080p.The HT does help it out in quite a number of games.In Metro:last light fx6350 which has near about same clocks as fx4320 but higher core counts was significantly ahead of the latter in the tests.

For monitor you can look for Dell S2240L ~8.5k.BenQ RL2240H is a TN panel based monitor.
S2240L would have better viewing angles and color production.