DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Do we need sp2 for windows XP???

40 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/do-we-need-sp2-for-windows-xp.2283/

nishantv2003
nishantv2003 Original post #1
Oct 26, 2004 at 3:02 PM
how many of u guyes think sp2 for xp is essential,because after installing many of your software andhardware wont work properly(t.v.tuner card does not work properly with sp1 also, atleast my). :(
K
Oct 26, 2004 at 3:48 PM
My PC works fine without it
saROMan
saROMan #3
Oct 26, 2004 at 4:31 PM
well as a matter of fact..u do........if u r not conn to inet..then u donn even need SP1 ....but donn wanna mess up PC after connetin to net......SP2 is a must ..for ur own security..........hehehehe
VD17
VD17 #4
Oct 26, 2004 at 4:42 PM
mine runs perfectly well and secure without it... all you need is a good anti-virus and a strong firewall...
in fact, i found more problems than solutions with SP2...
A
Oct 26, 2004 at 5:34 PM
Get Loads of copies of SP2 :)

*labnol.blogspot.com/2004/10/gets-lots-of-copies-of-windows-xp-sp2.html
drgrudge
Oct 26, 2004 at 5:49 PM
if u connect to internet then sp2 is nessasary...
even otherwise it has a good firewall and other security features...
go for sp2.
T
Oct 26, 2004 at 9:15 PM
sp2 fixes a lot of security bugs in windows. .. it is a MUST if ur online as drgrudge mentioned
VD17
VD17 #8
Oct 26, 2004 at 10:59 PM
oh well... i seem to be proving otherwise... ;)
i just hate it the way it screws the system performance....
S
svk #9
Oct 26, 2004 at 11:05 PM
sp2 is damn necessity for xp.
never go online without it for ram/christ/allah 's sake
NikhilVerma
Oct 26, 2004 at 11:19 PM
sp2 sucks...
I have SP1, I don't use any firewalls and I use Firefox....
And I have never got any virus....
So I don't need SP2
drgrudge
drgrudge #11
Oct 26, 2004 at 11:21 PM
mine is windows xp with sp2 in build , so i didnt install again...
saROMan
saROMan #12
Oct 26, 2004 at 11:27 PM
me to.....Sp 2 integrated......so cant tell u wat diff it makes w out SP2....
lavan_joy
lavan_joy #13
Oct 27, 2004 at 12:48 AM
I Like SP2 .I need it....
Z
zenblue #14
Oct 27, 2004 at 1:27 AM
i think sp2 is a necessity if someone is using internet on winxp..it definitely has lots of improvements compared to sp1 or plain XP in addtions to all the bug fixes till the date it was released...but "Data Prevention Execution" feature sometimes do prevents some softwares from running or even installing..also some of the activeX contents are blocked by internet explorer by default when some website tries to install it...you can install it by clicking at appropriate links there but it does creates some problems for someone migrating from sp1 to sp2...slight change in working of some aspects...but i would still say its worth every bit of it...
tuxfan
tuxfan #15
Oct 27, 2004 at 11:17 AM
You will need all the service packs that M$ releases. Their OS (especially WinXP) has so many bugs that they will release a service pack only in case of critical updates. If they care to release patches for all bugs, they will not be able to release Longhorn for many more years. :roll:
xenkatesh
xenkatesh #16
Oct 27, 2004 at 3:17 PM
Why SP2 with so many Bugs some of the programs mite not working fully irriated!!!!
W
wORm #17
Oct 27, 2004 at 8:25 PM
Installing SP2 has increased the performance of my PC. Also, there are people under the impression that anti-vir and firewall can keep an unpatched PC safe, well I think its better to be safe than sorry.
B
Oct 27, 2004 at 10:22 PM
To answer ur q: Nope
U very well dont need even sp1 juss update against the blaster nd frnds
and use a browser like opera or mozilla.
The major stuff get into the system thro ie not cuz ie is weak or bad just cuz it is famous nd most of the ppl use it.So the nut who makes a worm makes it for microsoft products like ie or outlook.The way to avoid it is simple.
All the other possiblity is by downloading files if u kno wat ur downloading and wat sites u vist then i guess we all can avoid virus and bugs.
Sp2 makes the system a hell lota slower half the stuff stop workin.
Why the hell use it wen u can live without it?
alib_i
alib_i #19
Oct 28, 2004 at 3:20 AM
sp2 sux ..
makes comp slower and it full bugz
applications dont work properly with it !!!

just keep installing the security updates .. . that's all you need ..
no need of sp2

and those thinking of sp2's firewall .... most of us use ZA or other third party firewalls. no need of xp's firewall

and those who think that ppl connecting to net shud have sp2 ..
let me tell you .. my comp stays ON for 24hrs a day, 7 days a week
and im always connected internet from lan
i never got a virus
just keep installing the security updates .. that's all u need
G
Godmode #20
Oct 28, 2004 at 11:35 AM
SP2 screws some of the softwares like Norton systemworks..some games and stuff...that;s why some ppl are skeptical about installing SP2..

People talk straight to the point rather than saying SP2 is not good...give some real examples
rohanbee
rohanbee #21
Oct 28, 2004 at 5:34 PM
I installed SP2 because of info that i got that says that windows has a lot of ports which are open by default. If one is one the internet these openings/ports can be used by hackers/spammers/softwares etc to get info and play havock with our computers.
A lot of firewalls would do the same thing for your system what sp2 does but since it is free downloading with original os why not install it??
At the end of the day it will give you peace of mind and to some extent hassle free usage of the internet.
I think firewalls are as important as a good anti-virus software.
sav_more
sav_more #22
Oct 28, 2004 at 5:44 PM
if u reglarly use the net sp2 is a must.only antiviruses and firewalls are not enuf.sp2 applies all the patches released by microsoft and secures the system.
so if u use the net and dont want 2 screw ur system INSTALL SP2.
alib_i
alib_i #23
Oct 28, 2004 at 7:39 PM
Godmode said:
SP2 screws some of the softwares like Norton systemworks..some games and stuff...that;s why some ppl are skeptical about installing SP2..

People talk straight to the point rather than saying SP2 is not good...give some real examples

I know atleast 5 ppl in my lan who reinstalled xp after installing sp2 ..
cos it slowed down the comp ..
and obviously if something screws up your comp and makes other softwares go haywire ...
then better not install it

rohanbee said:
I installed SP2 because of info that i got that says that windows has a lot of ports which are open by default. If one is one the internet these openings/ports can be used by hackers/spammers/softwares etc to get info and play havock with our computers.
everything is not that simple ...
simply installing sp2 will not entirely ensure your security ..
you will have to take other steps ..
so y do u want to secure your computer in more resource heavy way

rohanbee said:
A lot of firewalls would do the same thing for your system what sp2 does but since it is free downloading with original os why not install it??
there are lots of good free firewalls too
if you want firewall ... then a freshly installed winxp also has a firewall
just that it has less options configurable
sav_more said:
if u reglarly use the net sp2 is a must.only antiviruses and firewalls are not enuf.sp2 applies all the patches released by microsoft and secures the system.
u r right .. only firewalls and av are not enuf
u need security patches .....
just keep installing security updates .. that's all you need ..
no need to screw up your comp and other softwares already there on the comp

i wud like to write it again
alib_i said:
and those who think that ppl connecting to net shud have sp2 ..
let me tell you .. my comp stays ON for 24hrs a day, 7 days a week
and im always connected internet from lan
i never got a virus
just keep installing the security updates .. that's all u need
W
wORm #24
Oct 28, 2004 at 8:02 PM
alib_i, SP2 may have slowed down your computer, but it improves performance on most computers, like mine.

You have completely missed one major point. SP2's benefits for novice users. You are looking at SP2 from just your own perspective. Advanced users can keep their computer safe under most circumstances, however, for novice users (a vast majority of all computer users) the built in firewall, the outdated virus defition alert, various vulnerability patches are invaluable.

Let's face it, most computer users don't install firewalls and don't have updated antivirus software, this vast majority of people is what SP2 will prove invaluable to.
alib_i
alib_i #25
Oct 30, 2004 at 3:16 PM
@wORm ..
if you dont keep your comp updated .. then even sp2 cant help you.

abt firewalls ...
even i never used firewalls till recent. i simply talked abt firewall cos lots of ppl here praise sp2 cos of its firewall. i dont see any point in it.

and yes .. may be ur right in the fact that ... sp2 is an easier way out for tyros
but i say its not the best way out
swatkat
swatkat #26
Oct 30, 2004 at 3:22 PM
Guys,recently Chip Magazine carried out test between XP,Suse Lin,Mac OSX.Without any pacthes and updates XP was the most vulnerable of the lot next came Suse Lin and OSX was the safest with fewest problems of the lot.
But with all the updates and patches for all thtree OSes,XP with it's SP2 update came out as winner and dissappoingly OSX and Suse Lin were nowhere near to XPwithSP2 in terms of safety.
So now u know.
sav_more
sav_more #27
Oct 30, 2004 at 6:39 PM
swatkat is right i read that article in chip.without sp2 xp has a threat of level 5(max).but with sp2 installed it is the safest os out here
xenkatesh
xenkatesh #28
Oct 30, 2004 at 9:43 PM
I dont claim SP2 mine works fine without any problem!
KHUBBU
KHUBBU #29
Nov 3, 2004 at 12:06 AM
can u all post the start up time of ur system after installing sp2. somebody told me it took 180 seconds to load xp after installing sp2.
W
wORm #30
Nov 3, 2004 at 12:23 AM
My start-up time is around 50-60 seconds, I don't know what it was before installing SP2, but it seems to have improved with SP2.
S
SHell #31
Nov 7, 2004 at 6:51 PM
SP2 is needed 4 fixing many bugs. One of the chip magazine issues
had shown that after updating to SP2 all the bugs have been fixed.
u r right after instaling SP@ some softwares don't run like Nero 6.
(they have only solve the problem in their latest version 6.3.1.25).

But SP2 is essential 4 computer security.
P
perk_bud #32
Nov 8, 2004 at 4:24 PM
there only the secuity reason gamers need not bother
KHUBBU
KHUBBU #33
Nov 8, 2004 at 10:19 PM
See this:


*kama.sarcnet.com/xpsp1vsxpsp2_page6.html
T
Nov 8, 2004 at 11:53 PM
i think if connect o net then sp2 is must but if you dont have net connection then kick out sp2 or for that matter even the antivirus
sp2 secures the computer very well and if still want to make it more secure then go and close all the unneccasry services

my boot time
in xp sp1- 17 sec
win xp sp2 on sp1- 25 sec
win xp sp2(slipstream) - 20sec
ShekharPalash
Nov 9, 2004 at 12:48 AM
SP2 is a "must have" update for all Windows users...

It not only makes Windows more secure (well this time reahllt more secure than it was before)... improves stability (now explorer.exe doesn't crash that much... )...
KHUBBU
KHUBBU #36
Nov 10, 2004 at 12:15 AM
well it (crash) never happened to me even with sp1.
sms_solver
Nov 10, 2004 at 1:40 AM
i don't know if sp2 is reqd or not
but i have installed it

sp2 is huge having around 2,900+ files

the org WinXP CD contains around 6,500+ files

does MS need to update nearly 1/2 of files to make it
full proof :shock:
T
Nov 11, 2004 at 3:27 PM
nishantv2003 said:
how many of u guyes think sp2 for xp is essential,because after installing many of your software andhardware wont work properly(t.v.tuner card does not work properly with sp1 also, atleast my). :(


HI NISHANTV2003, MY TV TUNER CARD WAS ALSO NOT WORKING PROPERLY BUT AFTER SP2 IT'S WORKS VERY FINE. :)
KHUBBU
KHUBBU #39
Nov 12, 2004 at 12:21 AM
hi
finally i installed sp2, now my comp takes 35 sec compared to earlier 17-20 sec. i can bear that. i will try to decrease boot up time. well everything is working fine. and pinnacle pctv is also working fine.

nothing to get scared from sp2. and it works even on "Indian" version of xp !
alib_i
alib_i #40
Nov 12, 2004 at 3:02 PM
all those whu posted here ...
just read my posts in last page ( page 2 )