I am talking about everyone in this thread who said IE/Opera is good/bad, I pointed you out cos many people will pick up this statement of yours and start a browser war again. We know very well that people are finicky on subject of browsers and OS's.
the subject should have had 'was' instead of 'is'. 'Do you believe firefox 2.0 was worth the wait?'
I for one, didn't notice anything different. Only that tabs have their own close buttons and that the tools dialog box is laid out differently. I did have problems with some extensions not working with 2.0 but now most of them have new versions which do.
I don't think won't be possible in near future....though nowdays 2.0 seems to use a bit less RAM then 1.5....let's wait what 3.0 will show us! Even IE is resource hungry...try opening all sites opened on your ff with ie...mem with ie would be greater than FF!
FF used to be gr8 in early days. now its takes too much RAM. try using it for 2 hours continuously, u will see. on the other hand IE is quick and doesnt take that much RAM...... comments please
I haD FIREFOX2 but it gave me some problems so uninstalled it.. BUT I KNOW ITS A GOOD BROWSER A FRIEND OF MINE IS ALREADY USING IT AND IS HAPPY WITH IT
S
shashank_digitreader#21
Dec 20, 2006 at 9:48 PM
**** the firefox, i hate it the most and i do have the reason:
the speed of the first tab is very good but the when i open the second tab and open the link, it does not respond at all, but whereas opera all the tabs work fine with great speed.
Worth the wait ?? Thats a strange question , considering that the diff. version only points to some minor updated features with a updated Gecko engine ... infact , u can tweak v1.5 to be as fast a v2.0 , and miss out on the auto spell check ... v3.0 is good , i tried the alpha (rather a pre-alpha) ... works fine , but crashes randomly ..