Guys do u beleive in horoscopes, Janam Patris, Pandits etc??
harryneopotter said:
In other words, how is our future determined by planetary position.
If you are not asking then are you trying to state it ? your expression doesnt seems to be so. I wonder how much you know about great science of astrology that you put your thumb over something which has been unquestioned since 5000 years of established continuation. Yes! our ancient scientists did consider earth as the center of the universe and there was a definite reason for that which probably none of your school books taught you and you were never given any knowledge over our ancient science. I wonder how can people call themselves follower of science when they dont even have the minimal ability to ponder ?karnivore said:
Source: *www.aryabhatt.com/vediclessons/vediclesson3.htm
almighty said:
I guess i know enough, not to call it science, for one thing and for the other, not to fall for it.
Of course unquestioned..............by the "brainwashed"
I don't know if i can call this an explanation or a pathetic attempt to justify a mistake, that is still embedded in our system of "horse-crap". The fact remains that if one gets his co-ordinates wrong, whatever the reasons, all calculations, based on it have to go wrong.
why , i wanted to post this thing and someone other postsnix said:
Horoscope is a bunch of bullcrap founded by inconfident losers who can't stand on their own and need someone to tell them what to do next. Tell them they are gonna be dead tomorrow and they'll kill themselves.
"Vedas". Good xcuse. Say whatever u hav to say and then just mention it is in "Vedas". Baaaas. It will become sacrosanct. The Holy Cow, that can't be slaughtered. 99% of us have never read Vedas, and of those who have, 99% misinterpret, largely because of the ancient sanskrit, and partly because they want to misinterpret. So there u go. U hav a nice excuse.planetcall said:
Next time u post, first answer this cute little question.
Thats what i said in post #9harryneopotter said:
The art is entirely "probabilistic". Anything can be taken as basis for that. Not just planetary positions. e.g Numerology where the basis is "numbers" or Palmistry, where the basis is the skin folds on our palms etc. All these work within the same set-up. Only the executions are different. Of all the three branches, i find astrology, to use the maximum set of variables.
No science cannot define a "life", at least in terms of a set of equations, if thats what u want to know.
I can quite well guess what u r trying to get at. Anyway, the source of energy is nutritions and various other elements in nature e.g. oxygen.
Nothing. The body decays and goes back to the nature, (Law of conservation of Energy) Nature remains where it is.
planetcall said:
Yamaraj said:
Yamaraj said:
a·nal·o·gyHelp~Is~Here said:
Yes, and I don't keep a stock of virgins with me either.Help~Is~Here said:
Yamaraj said:
Who's "us"? It is just you.Help~Is~Here said:
If you cannot comprehend simple analogies it's not my problem, is it? Believing in a superficial god that has never been seen, but yet known to control everything, and still ridiculing those who believe in stars is only a pathetic attempt at hypocrisy.Help~Is~Here said:
Yamaraj said:
Anal-yzing others is my hobby.Help~Is~Here said: