DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

EVGA Releases GeForce GTX 285 FTW Edition - 720MHz / 1620MHz / 2772MHz

4 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/evga-releases-geforce-gtx-285-ftw-edition-720mhz-1620mhz-2772mhz.107509/

A
AuDioFreaK39 Original post #1
Jan 28, 2009 at 3:33 PM
EVGA Releases GeForce GTX 285 FTW Edition

*img91.imageshack.us/img91/7477/evgalogosg3.gif

720MHz core, top speed

Today, EVGA has announced the availability of its top model single-GPU card, the GeForce GTX 285 “For The Win” Edition. With clock speeds of a stunning 720MHz core, 1620MHz shaders, and 2772MHz of 0.8ns 512-bit GDDR3 memory, this is the fastest GeForce GTX 285 on the market and offers an effective 177.4 GB/s of total memory bandwidth.

The card, modeled 01G-P3-1288-AR, is available from EVGA’s site and many retailers and e-tailers nationwide with a suggested price of $449.

In addition, we previously reported that GTX 285 cards are based on the Nvidia G200-350-B3 chip, are operational at 1.15 volts, and are expected to reach a maximum of around 750MHz core speeds on standard cooling. Because the FTW Edition is the highest binned model in its class, we can positively say that it definitely should be able to reach, if not exceed, this suggested core speed. With the EVGA GPU voltage tuning utility being released for the GTX 285 in the coming weeks, this should prove to be an exciting task to achieve for many enthusiasts.

On another note, EVGA has announced that it is currently working on a backplate for its GTX 285s as it has done with its GTX 295s. The product not only serves an aesthetic accessory, but is claimed to offer superior heat transfer from the backside of the PCB. More information on the GTX 285 backplate, including an ETA, will be available soon.


*www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11708&Itemid=1
comp@ddict
Jan 28, 2009 at 9:13 PM
Wasn't GTX280 OC version at 702MHz?

And they are charging 499$, up from 400$ for GTX280, what they made a transition to 55nm from 65nm or the opposite??
x3060
x3060 #3
Jan 29, 2009 at 7:52 AM
now that's too costly for the performance it offers...99$ is just too much, i think.