DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Extra graphics card.

36 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/extra-graphics-card.154286/

amruth kiran
amruth kiran Original post #1
Mar 18, 2012 at 10:22 PM
I currently have a 9400gt 1 gb graphics card from nvidia and after two years now i am planning to upgrade my pc. I am thinking of a msi hd 6850. Can i couple my old card with this new one? I am seen some guys in the forum using these old cards are physx engines i guess. Some one care to explain how i too can do the same? And do post the mobo which is required. Thanks!
avinandan012
Mar 18, 2012 at 10:42 PM
u can use that 9400gt as physx card but it will slow down(read bottleneck) your 6850.
6850 is a very good performer @ 720p. At 1080p u might have to settle for a lesser settings in some titles.
Sujeet
Sujeet #3
Mar 18, 2012 at 10:48 PM
Post in complete rig and psu details .
You will need a good psu to handle 6850.

Anyway 9400gt cant handle latest phyx heavy games when dedicated entirely for physx rendering using nvidia sli profiles.
ashis_lakra
Mar 18, 2012 at 11:16 PM
Try "Physx Mod" software, you can use that as Physx card . However, TBH I don't think it'll slow down your HD 6850 as your 9400GT will be dedicated for Physx processing only.

People are using them without complains in this forum only.
R
Mar 18, 2012 at 11:45 PM
PhysX GPUs


nvdia page showing 9400gt does not support physx
Sujeet
Sujeet #6
Mar 19, 2012 at 12:36 AM
^^Ya ..9400gt isnt meant for physx.
topgear
topgear #7
Mar 19, 2012 at 3:34 AM
for physx one needs a comaptible nvidia gpu with at-least 32 Stream Processors / CUDA Cores ;-)
R
Mar 19, 2012 at 5:47 AM
for physx one needs a comaptible nvidia gpu with at-least 32 Stream Processors / CUDA Cores ;-)

but one think i notice on 9400 gt was , case telling it support physx *www.planeta-informatica.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/pr_xfx9400gt1.jpg
amruth kiran
Mar 19, 2012 at 7:32 AM
Mine does support physx. I 've been using it for 2 years now. There's even an option in the nvidia control panel . I just played arkham city with physx enabled.
dibya_kol
dibya_kol #10
Mar 19, 2012 at 3:47 PM
Even i did use hardware physx on 8200 ( onboard gpu of xfx 8200 mobo, yes,on 16sp).. it was unplayable though. i forgot which nvidia driver i used (may be 258.96) + PhysX-mod-1.03 .. only got 3-5 fps in batman AA.
@op u can use 94gt as a physx card but it would be damn slow, even in low physx settings it can't handle hardware physx. anything bellow 96gt won't give u satisfactory performance. but if u want, u can give a try at least .. :)
avinandan012
Mar 19, 2012 at 6:00 PM
cosider atleast a 450 for hardware physx
dibya_kol
dibya_kol #12
Mar 19, 2012 at 7:04 PM
with my 240 gt, i have played batman AA and AC, metro 2033, mafia 2 in high physx (got avg 30-40fps in most of the titles).
For physx, more Cuda core = more fps in physx, that is the simple math.
Cilus
Cilus #13
Mar 20, 2012 at 12:07 AM
cosider atleast a 450 for hardware physx

That's not true, a GT 240 GDDR3/GDDR5 or GT 430 is very much okay with PhysX.

i play Batman Arkham City @ 1920X1080 with everything set to highest, including PhysX and get 60 to 65 FPS all the time. BTW, my card is GT 240 1 GB GDDR5, not the old 8800 GT as shown in my siggy. It was burnt during a voltage fluctuation.

9400GT for PhysX...joke of the day, nothing will run, you need 32 SP or a 9500 GT for it.
slashragnarok
Mar 20, 2012 at 12:16 AM
9500 gt is the lowest 9 series card with Physx supported I think.
dibya_kol
dibya_kol #15
Mar 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM
^^ yes u r absolutly right cilus. in dx9 mode physx and others set to max, me also got avg 50 fps in batman ac with 240gt(1gb ddr3) .. :D
As i said early, 94gt can be use as a physx card, but it can't handle any games out there even physx set to low.
amruth kiran
Mar 21, 2012 at 10:11 AM
Okay okay. I get it i'll just buy a good mid range card. A hd 6850 or a gtx 550/560.
That would be enough i guess
Sujeet
Sujeet #17
Mar 21, 2012 at 10:51 AM
go for msi 6850 then.
amruth kiran
Mar 21, 2012 at 8:00 PM
Sujeet- you read my mind.
avinandan012
Mar 21, 2012 at 8:04 PM
@ cilus that's true a 240 will get job done but a 450 will be better if op can find one , cause some are selling 4xx series cards they have that's why i suggested
dibya_kol
dibya_kol #20
Mar 22, 2012 at 12:15 AM
@OP, if u don't bother about physx then go for 6850 or 7770. But if u do need physx go for 560/560ti.
BTW, what psu and cpu u have got ?
And at which res do u game ?
Sujeet
Sujeet #21
Mar 22, 2012 at 12:37 AM
^^560ti Will be bit too high for that budget.
560GTX in case physx is req.
Although physx is more or less a gimmick.A wise man once told me!!!
dibya_kol
dibya_kol #22
Mar 22, 2012 at 1:06 AM
Although physx is more or less a gimmick.A wise man once told me!!!

We can still play games at 800x600 res but we look for better res, why ? for those res a 15k rig is enough, don't need to spend high amount of money on rigs(cpu,mobo,gpu,psu,led monitor etc .....), but still update and spend money for those, why ? A simple duel core rather than a single core is enough for such low res, but we still talk about a quad core or eight core, why ?

Because game is all about eyecandy.
topgear
topgear #23
Mar 22, 2012 at 5:23 AM
Okay okay. I get it i'll just buy a good mid range card. A hd 6850 or a gtx 550/560.
That would be enough i guess

don't even think of getting GTX 550 - get either GTX 560 or HD6850.

@OP, if u don't bother about physx then go for 6850 or 7770. But if u do need physx go for 560/560ti.
BTW, what psu and cpu u have got ?
And at which res do u game ?

here's his present config and he will play at 1280x1024 ;-)

My present config-
intel dual core 1.8ghz
2 gb ram
160+320 ext hdd.
Nvidia 9400gt (1 gb)
psu- mercury 420w
mobo- intel d945gcnl

which he is going to upgrade soon .
Sujeet
Sujeet #24
Mar 22, 2012 at 1:51 PM
We can still play games at 800x600 res but we look for better res, why ? for those res a 15k rig is enough, don't need to spend high amount of money on rigs(cpu,mobo,gpu,psu,led monitor etc .....), but still update and spend money for those, why ? A simple duel core rather than a single core is enough for such low res, but we still talk about a quad core or eight core, why ?

Because game is all about eyecandy.
PhysX Is more of Marketing Srategy Rather than An eye candy.:cool:
dibya_kol
dibya_kol #25
Mar 22, 2012 at 2:37 PM
PhysX Is more of Marketing Srategy Rather than An eye candy.:cool:

that depends how u takes it .. :cool: but i love it .. and whoever used it, most of them love it .. :wink:

here's his present config and he will play at 1280x1024 ;-)
which he is going to upgrade soon .

ohh sorry i overlooked it !! :p but a duel core with 1.8ghz at those res ? anything over 5670/440 gt will be big time bottleneck with OP's cpu. and a 6850 or 560 with a generic 420wt psu, that sounds weird too !!:shock:

need to update his rig first.
amruth kiran
Mar 22, 2012 at 8:56 PM
iam going to get a hd6850 with 500w psu. atleast.maybe corsair

hopefuly i'll get a i5 2500k or a amdfx4100 3.6 ghz processor.
so it wont be a bottleneck like you guys think

and yes i'll play at highres only
maybe at 1280x1024
thetechfreak
Mar 22, 2012 at 8:59 PM
Good choice. Get atleast a Corsair CX430v2 PSU atleast. or something beefier if you plan to OC.

amruth kiran said:
so it wont be a bottleneck like you guys think
There is going to be a bottlenect 100% sure. We dont think. It will happen :p
coderunknown
Mar 23, 2012 at 1:09 AM
^^ READ. he said about bottleneck when he upgrades his processor :|
dibya_kol
dibya_kol #29
Mar 23, 2012 at 10:19 AM
iam going to get a hd6850 with 500w psu. atleast.maybe corsair

hopefuly i'll get a i5 2500k or a amdfx4100 3.6 ghz processor.
so it wont be a bottleneck like you guys think

and yes i'll play at highres only
maybe at 1280x1024

Sounds good .. :) but don't go for FX serise
amruth kiran
Mar 23, 2012 at 3:53 PM
Dibya_kol- why shouldn i go for the fx series?? Its pretty good . Right?

Good choice. Get atleast a Corsair CX430v2 PSU atleast. or something beefier if you plan to OC.

There is going to be a bottlenect 100% sure. We dont think. It will happen :p

you mean even after i upgrade my pc. There will a bottleneck? Or what? Explain. .
dibya_kol
dibya_kol #31
Mar 23, 2012 at 6:33 PM
@OP, fx serise is 'fail' by amd, performed very poorly in benchmarks. On the other hand 2500k is a kick ass. Even 4100 is way behind of 2400/2500(non k), even it is highly oced.
No, there will be no bottleneck in ur future rig.
avinandan012
Mar 23, 2012 at 6:48 PM
if you want to go amd way go for Phenom II
amruth kiran
Mar 23, 2012 at 7:28 PM
So you guys are saying go for the phenom 2 series or the intel i series. NOT the FX series??

Sorry for the other thread on the queries of msi graphics card. I apologise to sam the moderator and sujeet who pointed it out to me. Thank you and it wont happen again.
topgear
topgear #34
Mar 24, 2012 at 4:42 AM
If you want a VFM quad core / HExa core config Phenom II 960T - if you want the ultimate VFM performer then nothing is better than core i5 2500k coupled with a good Z68 mobo for a gaming rig ;-)
amruth kiran
Mar 25, 2012 at 12:14 PM
this being a thread on gfx cards is pointless to talk about processors
anyways if i buy a MSI HD 6850 do i need to overclock it??
or should just take the PE/OC edition just in case? :-?
skeletor
skeletor #36
Mar 25, 2012 at 6:42 PM
this being a thread on gfx cards is pointless to talk about processors
Since you have another thread going on. I'm closing this thread.

It's best if people ask all their queries in one thread instead of creating multiple threads. It's best if you create a SINGLE thread in the PC Configurations section after filling up the questionnaire - which tells us the budget of the whole config. Much easier to suggest that way.

anyways if i buy a MSI HD 6850 do i need to overclock it??
or should just take the PE/OC edition just in case? :-?
No, you don't need to.