DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Firefox 6 is here!!!

56 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/firefox-6-is-here.145314/

MetalheadGautham
MetalheadGautham Original post #1
Aug 19, 2011 at 8:52 PM
Mozilla Firefox Web Browser — Free Download

And this does not even seem like news. Mozilla's been upping the version number faster than the breeding rate of mosquitoes at the nearby garbage dump.

Here's an interesting read that sums up a lot of my views:
Firefox 6: Four Reasons Not to Upgrade | PCWorld Business Center

And just for the reference it was released on 16th August, 2011 AD.

And look at this for the lulz
*upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/timeline/2346550946e26710ba12e291fba45357.png
Alok
Alok #2
Aug 19, 2011 at 9:05 PM
I still use firefox3.6 due to idm**;-) new version just catches me and disable idm:-D
Skud
Skud #3
Aug 19, 2011 at 9:11 PM
Already got a taste of Firefox 9 nightly. ;)
The Sorcerer
Aug 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM
Firefox didn't say that there was an update available and prompt if i want to download it. It did it on its own. WTF!!!??
S
Aug 20, 2011 at 12:53 AM
i am updating to firefox 7 beta now.:razz:
S
Aug 21, 2011 at 3:39 PM
FF6 has got to be the bulkiest browser ever in term of memory consumption\
JojoTheDragon
Aug 21, 2011 at 4:23 PM
Shouldn't they update the version 5, rather than releasing new versions so recklessly ?
d6bmg
d6bmg #8
Aug 21, 2011 at 4:30 PM
Firefox 3 had many versions, but then 4, 5, now, 6. Why so fast in changing version numbers?? Competition with IE to beat its version number? :unsure:
Ishu Gupta
Aug 21, 2011 at 4:52 PM
FF6 has got to be the bulkiest browser ever in term of memory consumption\
Memory usage is down by 100MB (compared to FF5).

Firefox 3 had many versions, but then 4, 5, now, 6. Why so fast in changing version numbers?? Competition with IE to beat its version number? :unsure:
Copying Chrome.
J
Joker #11
Aug 21, 2011 at 7:05 PM
Firefox > Opera > Chrome.

FF6 has got to be the bulkiest browser ever in term of memory consumption
myth. that award goes to chrome despite being faster. (sandboxing(
Liverpool_fan
Aug 21, 2011 at 8:11 PM
Here's an interesting read that sums up a lot of my views:
Firefox 6: Four Reasons Not to Upgrade | PCWorld Business Center
]
Absolutely ridiculous article. Sums up half the tech journalists and readers who don't have a clue before writing such pile of crap.

Shouldn't they update the version 5, rather than releasing new versions so recklessly ?

This is what exactly they have done, updated Firefox 5 to Firefox 6.
Faun
Faun #13
Aug 21, 2011 at 8:31 PM
tony_bradley, I am disappoint
NIGHTMARE
NIGHTMARE #14
Aug 21, 2011 at 8:53 PM
Still memory hunger problem.
MetalheadGautham
Aug 21, 2011 at 10:12 PM
Absolutely ridiculous article. Sums up half the tech journalists and readers who don't have a clue before writing such pile of crap.

Well lot of stuff there is crap, but he does make valid points when it comes to version numbering. I mean just look at the timeline I posted. And firefox has had a fairly constant rate of progress as far as features and major changes are concerned through versions.

Imagine us growing old and logging into TDF via Firefox version 1835.0 when IE would still be in some double digit version 67 :lol:
Liverpool_fan
Aug 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM
Imagine us growing old and logging into TDF via Firefox version 1835.0 when IE would still be in some double digit version 67 :lol:

Yes. But does that really matter to an average user and even you or me for that matter?
ithehappy
ithehappy #17
Aug 22, 2011 at 12:44 AM
Absolutely crazy with FF. They've gone mad.
A
Aug 22, 2011 at 7:58 PM
I still use Firefox 4. I don't think there is any need of Firefox 5 and even 6.
Zangetsu
Zangetsu #19
Aug 22, 2011 at 8:49 PM
hey I m getting popup message in FF 6.0 that FF7.0 is available
Vyom
Vyom #20
Aug 22, 2011 at 11:16 PM
Yeah, FF 7 beta is out.
buddyram
buddyram #21
Aug 23, 2011 at 9:50 AM
I dont see any new features added to the latest versions, instead they could have updated the older versions!
Skud
Skud #22
Aug 23, 2011 at 10:49 AM
I think all they want is to align the version number with IE as quickly as they can. ;)
xtremevicky
Aug 23, 2011 at 11:08 AM
I did not find anything new yet !
Krow
Krow #26
Aug 25, 2011 at 5:25 PM
I still use firefox3.6 due to idm**;-) new version just catches me and disable idm:-D

IDM addon has been updated. Uninstall IDM addon old version first. Update Firefox to version 6. Then go here: Internet Download Manager Integration guide for Firefox

And click install.
Krow
Krow #28
Aug 26, 2011 at 4:31 PM
The more RAM you have, the more FF/Opera end up consuming. After about two hours of usage, Opera started consuming 512Mb of RAM and FF was at 480MB. :lol: I have 6GB btw, will downgrade to 4GB and check again.

Nope If you want I can give a screenshot, Its his genetic problem.

Give screenshot of FF 6, also how much RAM do you have in your system? I am also using FF 6 on a system with 1GB RAM and the memory consumption is near 140MB. I'll check by using for longer and with more tabs also.
Skud
Skud #29
Aug 26, 2011 at 5:00 PM
In my case, it's 465MB with 19 tabs and 19 extensions. System has 4gb RAM on 32-bit Vista Business. No need to panic, I think.
Krow
Krow #30
Aug 26, 2011 at 5:17 PM
Yeah, seems reasonable enough. Btw I only use Adblock Plus, Adblock Plus Element Hiding Helper and Adblock Plus popup addon.
d6bmg
d6bmg #31
Aug 26, 2011 at 8:04 PM
In my case, it's 465MB with 19 tabs and 19 extensions. System has 4gb RAM on 32-bit Vista Business. No need to panic, I think.

No, but problem lies with people having 1 or 2GB ram in their PC.
Skud
Skud #33
Aug 26, 2011 at 8:43 PM
It's look like the extensions are the culprit. Will test the 9.0 nightly on Monday without any extensions. (It has most of the extensions incompatible anyway :().
d6bmg
d6bmg #34
Aug 26, 2011 at 9:01 PM
332M on my laptop with 2GB RAM.
26 Tabs 11 addons.

Then you are the lucky one. Just now my FF is reading 540MB after 3 hours of continuous browsing with 5 tabs open. :shock:(have 14 add-ons installed ;) )
NIGHTMARE
NIGHTMARE #36
Aug 26, 2011 at 10:21 PM
Give screenshot of FF 6, also how much RAM do you have in your system? I am also using FF 6 on a system with 1GB RAM and the memory consumption is near 140MB. I'll check by using for longer and with more tabs also.

I'm using Win 7 32 bit with 4 GB RAM. I have taken this screen shot with 18 tabs + 14 extension + 3 script running in grease monkey.

*i.imgur.com/wQP4Tl.jpg
Krow
Krow #37
Aug 27, 2011 at 2:09 AM
Then you are the lucky one. Just now my FF is reading 540MB after 3 hours of continuous browsing with 5 tabs open. :shock:(have 14 add-ons installed ;) )
How much RAM? As I said earlier, I am getting 140MB of RAM usage on a system with 1GB RAM when I open 5-10 tabs and three addons.


@ NIGHTMARE: That may be the work of some addon or script. Anyway, I switch between Opera 11.5 and FF. Both consume more or less equal amounts of RAM.
J
Joker #38
Aug 27, 2011 at 2:50 AM
I'm using Win 7 32 bit with 4 GB RAM. I have taken this screen shot with 18 tabs + 14 extension + 3 script running in grease monkey.
then u dont have any reason to complain. it is PERFECTLY normal and fine - not at all HIGH usage.
Krow
Krow #39
Aug 27, 2011 at 5:30 PM
I used to use this addon: *addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/fastestfox-browse-faster/
It doubled the RAM consumption. Suddenly FF was consuming over 500MB RAM when it used to consume around 200-230MB. Removed it and problem solved.

@ NIGHTMARE: You should see which addon is causing the problem. Could you list your addons? I'll install those on my FF and check.
thetechfreak
Aug 27, 2011 at 5:41 PM
I think this version is a good improvement over the older versions :D

Always been using Firefox in my laptop :)
NIGHTMARE
NIGHTMARE #41
Aug 27, 2011 at 8:08 PM
I used to use this addon: *addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/fastestfox-browse-faster/
It doubled the RAM consumption. Suddenly FF was consuming over 500MB RAM when it used to consume around 200-230MB. Removed it and problem solved.

@ NIGHTMARE: You should see which addon is causing the problem. Could you list your addons? I'll install those on my FF and check.

Here is the list of my addons--> Adblock plus, After the deadline, Flash video down loader, flash block, flashgot, Greasemonkey, Imgur Upload, Im translator, LastPass, SkipScreen, stylish, Wired Marker. There are four other but they are disable and one more thing while surfing FB my FF get stuck and freeze.
Ishu Gupta
Aug 27, 2011 at 8:16 PM
*addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/performance/#addon-11
Slow Firefox Add-Ons (Flashgot makes an appearance here)
d6bmg
d6bmg #43
Aug 27, 2011 at 11:22 PM
How much RAM? As I said earlier, I am getting 140MB of RAM usage on a system with 1GB RAM when I open 5-10 tabs and three addons.

I have 3GBs of RAM at that laptop, which I use generally for browsing for prolonged period of time.
Faun
Faun #44
Aug 27, 2011 at 11:39 PM
683MB @21Tabs and 11Addons
Krow
Krow #45
Aug 28, 2011 at 2:56 AM
TBH I don't need any addon other than adblock plus. That is the best. Maybe that is why Memory consumption doesn't trouble me. Anyway, I'll check NIGHTMARE's addons and see.

@ NIGHTMARE: Try disabling Flash got and check. FB is a heavy site so hanging with that much ram consumption is not unheard of.
d6bmg
d6bmg #46
Aug 28, 2011 at 6:08 PM
I also have flash got installed :(
red_devil
red_devil #47
Sep 1, 2011 at 10:40 PM
Chrome isn't that light either:
*i52.tinypic.com/2cyksvd.jpg

I somehow don't find FF as 'resource hungry' as its made out to be..
Krow
Krow #48
Sep 2, 2011 at 2:20 PM
For those having memory consumption problems, take a backup of your Firefox profile. Then delete the entire profile and uninstall the browser. Now reinstall version 6.0 and with a new profile.

On lifehacker.com, someone said the above reduced FF's RAM consumption at start to 53MB from 100+MB.
J
Sep 2, 2011 at 4:35 PM
I still use firefox 4. I think it is better. And no need to be instal or download version 6. ;D

Still use firefox 4. I think i am already satisfied for using it. :D
A
aryanraj #50
Sep 4, 2011 at 12:05 PM
most addons are working fine in FF6, but I was unable to find any notable difference between this and previous versions. :)
Krow
Krow #51
Sep 4, 2011 at 1:12 PM
Overall FF is pretty good imo. I mostly use Opera but I have noticed that a few websites don't render well in Opera. Haven't faced that problem in Firefox. :)
6x6
6x6 #52
Sep 30, 2011 at 8:46 AM
Updated to FF7 today. i think FF is racing with IE for version no.
coderunknown
Sep 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM
Chrome is already @ 16 beta
A
Sep 30, 2011 at 9:08 AM
Firefox 7 is here!!
thetechfreak
Sep 30, 2011 at 10:21 AM
6x6 said:
Updated to FF7 today. i think FF is
racing with IE for version no.
Well considering the fact that Firefox is atleast thrice as old as Chrome and Internet explorer is the Uncle of all browsers the only browser that is racing for numbers is Chrome.
Zangetsu
Zangetsu #56
Sep 30, 2011 at 11:22 AM
how many users in TDF use Firefox than any other browser?