DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Galaxy Ace Plus!!!

26 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/galaxy-ace-plus.150855/

abhidev
abhidev Original post #1
Jan 3, 2012 at 6:00 PM
*im.tech2.in.com/gallery/2012/jan/samsunggalaxyaceplus_031631216740_640x360.jpg

Its a revised version with higher cpu(1gHz), Ram(512mb), slightly bigger screen and inbuilt memory(3gb)

Specifications:
3.65-inch HVGA TFT Touchscreen with a 320 x 480 pixel resolution
3G, EDGE/GPRS, Wi-Fi b/g/n
GPS with A-GPS support
Bluetooth 3.0 with A2DP, USB 2.0
5 Megapixel camera with LED flash, WVGA video recording @ 30fps
Stereo FM radio with RDS
Memory expandable up to 32 GB via microSD card
3.5 mm handsfree socket


Source --> Tech2
coderunknown
Jan 3, 2012 at 6:44 PM
Wave M with Android.

i hope samsung use a better proccy this time. something like their humming bird processor and not some overclocked slow one. and don't try to pit it against the Neo V/Defy+. with a HVGA screen on a 3.65" screen, Samsung continues its low resolution screen strategy.
R
rajeevk #3
Jan 3, 2012 at 6:47 PM
Great!.........any idea about the price.
Skud
Skud #4
Jan 3, 2012 at 6:48 PM
At least they have included the camera flash this time. ;)
AndroidFan
Jan 3, 2012 at 7:13 PM
Pathetic screen DPI... a combination of large screen and low resolution...

Also, I am sure the processor is just another overclocked ARMv6 and not Cortex A8 level. I will be really surprised if that is not the case... Samsung only wants to deceive regular consumers...
comp@ddict
Jan 3, 2012 at 7:57 PM
If this is a ARMv6 and not a ARMv7 then no flash support, and we can expect the same Adreno 200 GPU, meaning ****, the camera might be the only saving grace. If this comes for 15k, I'll laugh at it.

But the problem is, 90% of the community will see the 1GHz tag and go for it.
coderunknown
Jan 3, 2012 at 9:24 PM
At least they have included the camera flash this time. ;)

camera flash was there in Ace too.

If this is a ARMv6 and not a ARMv7 then no flash support, and we can expect the same Adreno 200 GPU, meaning ****, the camera might be the only saving grace. If this comes for 15k, I'll laugh at it.

But the problem is, 90% of the community will see the 1GHz tag and go for it.

  • 3.65" display
  • 5Mp camera
  • Android Gingerbread
  • 1Ghz processor
  • only Rs.16,000 (assumption)
buy buy buy :facepalm:

this is what most will look at & miss these:
  • HVGA resolution when similar mobiles pack FWVGA resolution.
  • video recording at QVGA that also at 15FPS (for Galaxy Ace, so expecting same for Ace Plus)
  • no ICS update when Neo V & Defy+ will get it (Galaxy W & S+ left out already)
  • 1Ghz overclocked processor with absolute pathetic graphics. most likely the same Broadcomm processor used in Galaxy Y but overclocked.
  • Neo V cost same or sometimes less .
Shah
Shah #8
Jan 4, 2012 at 7:41 AM
Galaxy ace resembled iphone 4 and the upgraded ace+ resembles iphone 3g. C'mon Sammy! Why can't you work on new design?
Zangetsu
Jan 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM
This phone deserves a price under 10k
abhidev
abhidev #10
Jan 4, 2012 at 11:33 AM
all samsung phones look the same X(
tarey_g
tarey_g #11
Jan 4, 2012 at 11:41 AM
Galaxy ace resembled iphone 4 and the upgraded ace+ resembles iphone 3g. C'mon Sammy! Why can't you work on new design?

Galaxy Ace never looked like Iphone 4, but this does look like 3g. Bad, its like samsung is mocking Apple, I assume this model will not be sold in US or other countries and that's why they did this.
ofabhishek
Jan 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM
i'm looking for a decent android phone for my brother around 10-11k... but i can't see any VFM option in this range...

waiting for Ace+'s price tag....
KDroid
KDroid #13
Jan 4, 2012 at 11:58 AM
Poor Looks. Ace looks lot better!
devx
devx #14
Jan 4, 2012 at 12:02 PM
Samsung has disappointed us., :-(
tarey_g
tarey_g #15
Jan 4, 2012 at 12:56 PM
if its priced anything above 15k , I would suggest Galaxy R for 19, its a much better phone for little extra you pay.
abhidev
abhidev #16
Jan 4, 2012 at 1:53 PM
if its priced anything above 15k , I would suggest Galaxy R for 19, its a much better phone for little extra you pay.

:agreed:

saw galaxy note today...and man its huge!!!
comp@ddict
Jan 4, 2012 at 2:36 PM
video recording at QVGA that also at 15FPS (for Galaxy Ace, so expecting same for Ace Plus)

No, the camera got slightly better

480p (800x480) @ 30fps

That's Moto Defy standards. It might as well turn out that this sports a TiOMAP SoC(same as Moto Defy+) or just a Galaxy Ace overclocked(or Galaxy Y, who knows)


Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus specs
coderunknown
Jan 4, 2012 at 6:09 PM
yup. read in Anandtech. improved video a bit but still, no HD video. and another glossy mobile.
R
rhlravi #19
Jan 4, 2012 at 7:41 PM
The poor HVGA screen ruins it all.
xtremevicky
Jan 4, 2012 at 8:37 PM
What a disappointment .

Does it look like 3GS to anyone else also ?
tarey_g
tarey_g #21
Jan 5, 2012 at 4:08 PM
A better option will be Galaxy SL for 17k tax paid. Best will be galaxy R for 19k.
devx
devx #22
Jan 5, 2012 at 5:30 PM
A better option will be Galaxy SL for 17k tax paid. Best will be galaxy R for 19k.

Yes., i totally agree., and defy & defy + is also an another option.
comp@ddict
Jan 6, 2012 at 9:01 AM
There may be hope. GSMarena in it's hands-on mentions a ARM v7 CPU (flash!)
A
a2mn2002 #24
Jan 6, 2012 at 4:28 PM
What about lg optimus hub ?
coderunknown
Jan 6, 2012 at 5:14 PM
LG Optimus Hub = Galaxy Ace made by LG but with full 512Mb ram.
S
siddhipatel #26
Jan 12, 2012 at 10:49 AM
Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus is a great phone and I think it’s a latest version of Samsung Galaxy Ace. I am sure this phone will rock and will loved by all the youngsters.