^^ slightly off topic but what could be the underlying business strategy from nvidia to launch a ti version of a mid-high range card from the generation lineup running at that time? Which again almost performs at a lesser price same as the next better card of the same generation. Why is there a 660 and 660ti both ?
Which buyer's section will be willing to buy the 660 non ti if ti is available, and if it performs nearly well to a 670 , with a bit oc'ing of course, then why would anyone buy a 670?
the emerge of a ti version puts question mark on both its immediate next and previous units from a buyer's point, if i were a buyer i would ask if i buy a GTX760 now, and tmrw nvidia comes up with 760ti with a price gap of affordable margin against performance gain, then my 760 is a waste? do nvidia puts it that way?
> Currently, the cheapest 650 card available is from Zotac costing 7999 and the cheapest 650ti card is also from Zotac costing 9799.
> Similarly, the cheapest 660 card is from Zotac costing 16,399 and cheapest 660ti card is from MSI costing 21,400.
> In case of 650 and 650ti, people who buy this card generally have a lower and limited budget. imagine when someone originally had a budget of say 6-7k. For him, increasing his budget by 2k or 1k will get him a 650. in this case, for someone who already had to increase his budget by 2k to get a 650, 650ti is out of equation.
> in case of 660 and 660ti, the ~5k price difference does the job