DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Help!!!!

18 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/help.36255/

antoniobc
antoniobc Original post #1
Sep 12, 2006 at 8:16 PM
OK guyz! I'm new to this forum and this is the first time ive posted so plz reply. Here's my dilema. I'm doing computer engineering. Just started. and have the following config. How can I use it to the max with very very low expenditure.

MY COMP CONFIG.
Intel 810E Chipset based mboard
Intel Celeron 1.2Ghz Processor
128MB SDRam

Here is my main Q's
What OS should I load. (that wont hog my resources)?
santu_29
Sep 12, 2006 at 8:41 PM
antoniobc said:
OK guyz! I'm new to this forum and this is the first time ive posted so plz reply. Here's my dilema. I'm doing computer engineering. Just started. and have the following config. How can I use it to the max with very very low expenditure.

MY COMP CONFIG.
Intel 810E Chipset based mboard
Intel Celeron 1.2Ghz Processor
128MB SDRam

Here is my main Q's
What OS should I load. (that wont hog my resources)?

windows 98
Vyasram
Vyasram #3
Sep 12, 2006 at 9:44 PM
ubuntu linux - free
Pathik
Pathik #4
Sep 12, 2006 at 10:13 PM
win 98 or mandrake 10
n2casey
n2casey #5
Sep 12, 2006 at 11:04 PM
Windows 98
The Outsider
Sep 12, 2006 at 11:17 PM
98/me = would do
2k = usable but bit slow
xp = no way
Vishal Gupta
Sep 12, 2006 at 11:37 PM
Win 98, but u can try win XP also. I used win XP on 128 MB SD RAM for approx. 3 years before I got 512 MB DDR RAM :D
S
SE> #8
Sep 12, 2006 at 11:42 PM
Vishal Gupta said:
Win 98, but u can try win XP also. I used win XP on 128 MB SD RAM for approx. 3 years before I got 512 MB DDR RAM :D
...and I ran it on 64MB RAM till I got a 256MB wafer. ps: Am on 1GB currently :D
GeeNeeYes
Sep 13, 2006 at 1:25 AM
i still run windows xp on 192MB RAM (64MB shared)
and earlier i had only 128MB (32MB shared) :D

no problems with windows xp though and its been 4 years
antoniobc
antoniobc #10
Sep 13, 2006 at 6:43 PM
GeeNeeYes said:
i still run windows xp on 192MB RAM (64MB shared)
and earlier i had only 128MB (32MB shared) :D

no problems with windows xp though and its been 4 years
Are you guys talking about SP1 or SP2?? PROF??
kirtan
kirtan #11
Sep 14, 2006 at 1:10 AM
i think that u can run win xp using ur config.Intel Dotstation has much less resources and it is able to run the OS very easily.give xp a try.but this is for minimal use only.
TechGuru#1
Sep 14, 2006 at 6:45 AM
I first hand saw the disastrous run of win XP on my friends 128mb laptop & i myself never tried installing win XP on my old 128 megs rig!
IMHO,it's better 2 run win 98 on 128megs for a smoother experience!
Stalker
Stalker #13
Sep 15, 2006 at 6:32 PM
128 mb is the min req 4 XP Professional.
U shud probably turn off the memory logging features of xp by using the classic skin, turning off all animations & other visual effects to have a smoother experience
__________
oh........and don't even try SP2, it will increase ur boot time like hell
mediator
mediator #14
Sep 15, 2006 at 7:07 PM
Fedora core 5 with XFCE! It will be perfect!
champ_rock
Sep 17, 2006 at 6:07 PM
windows 2000 will also work fine..
R
Sep 17, 2006 at 8:47 PM
Lol 128 mb??

Use Windows 95 foir the best performance!:D
Third Eye
Third Eye #17
Sep 17, 2006 at 8:53 PM
Windows 98 runs fine on 128MB RAM.
sridatta
sridatta #18
Sep 17, 2006 at 11:53 PM
i used windows XP on 192 MB SDRAM and my frend is still running windows XP on 128 mb ram.. it 'll become hell to use after some days..
for best performance, go for win 98.