DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

hey norton lover...read this !

19 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/hey-norton-lover-read-this.20810/

anandk
anandk Original post #1
Dec 22, 2005 at 6:20 PM
Symantec antivirus in danger zone

Symantec's range of antivirus software is under imminent threat from a loophole discovered by an independent security expert, who says the flaw could permit certain virus or worms to attack and destroy programs on users' PCs. :twisted:

*www.whatistheword.com/story/SciTech_437.html
selva1966
Dec 22, 2005 at 7:31 PM
I know that in advance so I changed to NOD32 via Avast Pro :wink: :wink: :wink:
dIgItaL_BrAt
Dec 22, 2005 at 10:50 PM
I never did trust Symantec...was unable to stop many virii which other AV's could.
__Virus__
Dec 22, 2005 at 11:02 PM
*Thanks Kaspersky Developers*
A
ashnik #5
Dec 23, 2005 at 12:13 AM
i hated symantec from start only, not only it fails to block viri but also consumes too much memory.
sidewinder
Dec 23, 2005 at 4:20 AM
I hav a lot of memory in my pc but still i dont use Norton...sticking with avast.One thing i like most about Avast is REAL HASSLE FREE UPDATING !!! Norton uses task scheduler to run its live update nd I always keep my task schduler disabled...so no Norton for me.
Another fact...Norton is the only anvirus I have seen to be killed by a virus !I installed nav 2004 on a friends pc (which was already infected) nd upon the restart it was "KILLED"..Then installed AVG nd it did the job
F
freezer #7
Dec 23, 2005 at 12:29 PM
__Virus__ said:
*Thanks Kaspersky Developers*
Kaspersky ROCKS certainly
M
Dec 23, 2005 at 1:28 PM
Unless it is a big working org,there is no need for any antivirus software.

What i have noticed is these antivirus software attract viruses.

I have no antivirus software installed,so if a virus does attack my system it resides in my system doing what it does,and i go around my work doing what i do.(Of course i have every thing backed up)

It is a Live and Let Live policy.
S
Dec 23, 2005 at 1:29 PM
That's Why i shifted to Mcafee 8.0 Enterprise edition.

Any info how good this is????

Regards....
sidewinder
Dec 23, 2005 at 11:18 PM
shivaranjan.b said:
That's Why i shifted to Mcafee 8.0 Enterprise edition.

Any info how good this is????

Regards....

Only thing i know is it uses abt 40 mb of memory!!! But updatingais a lot better than desktop versions..updates are a lot smaller and it has a dedicated updater against active x on desktop edition
__Virus__
__Virus__ #11
Dec 23, 2005 at 11:38 PM
Massacre said:
Unless it is a big working org,there is no need for any antivirus software.

What i have noticed is these antivirus software attract viruses.

I have no antivirus software installed,so if a virus does attack my system it resides in my system doing what it does,and i go around my work doing what i do.(Of course i have every thing backed up)

It is a Live and Let Live policy.

Excluding the line "It is a Live and Let Live policy." I wonder what made you write all that stuff.
M
Massacre #12
Dec 24, 2005 at 11:35 AM
__Virus__ said:
Excluding the line "It is a Live and Let Live policy." I wonder what made you write all that stuff.

I was Drunk. :mrgreen:
anandk
anandk #13
Dec 24, 2005 at 5:21 PM
Symantec Readies Urgent Patch
*www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,124058,00.asp
LegendKiller
Dec 28, 2005 at 11:44 PM
I think 2004 was a real bad version,coz i remeber my friends warning to go for 2004 after 2003 version,which i think was superb!
After 2003 thinks haven't been same from symantec and its buggy and you need atleast 512mb ram for it to work properly.But leaving the memory usage aside i think it still is a damn good software and people just cant get over the "mem usage" phobia,quite similar to people criticising opera and praisin ff just b'coz opera wasn't free!
Which i think is quite biased and un-rational approach of writing a review
H
harsh bajpai #15
Dec 29, 2005 at 12:08 AM
kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky kaspersky



doesn't need help from other words.
ejvyas
ejvyas #16
Dec 29, 2005 at 3:06 AM
I agree Norton sucks. Changed to Mcafee long back. Trend still rules :p
dreams
dreams #17
Dec 30, 2005 at 7:11 AM
I use only Norton 2003 Pro Version and nothin seems 2 screw up.. works fine for the apst 3 yrs.
N
nitesh #18
Dec 30, 2005 at 11:20 AM
Massacre said:
Unless it is a big working org,there is no need for any antivirus software.

What i have noticed is these antivirus software attract viruses.

I have no antivirus software installed,so if a virus does attack my system it resides in my system doing what it does,and i go around my work doing what i do.(Of course i have every thing backed up)

It is a Live and Let Live policy.

I am disagree... it is unbeliveable... :evil:
sidewinder
Dec 31, 2005 at 6:29 AM
Massacre said:
Unless it is a big working org,there is no need for any antivirus software.

What i have noticed is these antivirus software attract viruses.

I have no antivirus software installed,so if a virus does attack my system it resides in my system doing what it does,and i go around my work doing what i do.(Of course i have every thing backed up)

It is a Live and Let Live policy.
I think this is a new year joke