DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

How to improve file copying speed on Windows 7 ?

27 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/how-to-improve-file-copying-speed-on-windows-7.165818/

C
chandanbs Original post #1
Nov 6, 2012 at 4:27 PM
I know at times you may have wondered the slowness of file copying using windows file explorer..

Its time to switch to TeraCopy...!!!

TeraCopy for Microsoft Windows - Code Sector


Just try it out .. i have had 30 % increase in file copying speed when i copy files from hard disk to usb drive.. and i even got max speed of 30MB/s using Sony SD cards (its max speed is 30 MB/s).

FYI, I'm using the free version and perfectly happy with it..
Flash
Flash #2
Nov 6, 2012 at 5:08 PM
You've came late to Teracopy.
Ashokkumar01cbe
Nov 13, 2012 at 9:50 AM
Use teracopy it is best for data transferring....
Theodre
Theodre #4
Nov 13, 2012 at 6:59 PM
You've came late to Teracopy.

Yeah like a decade late :) But it's still the best one :) Maybe this will help some of the newbies :)
Flash
Flash #5
Nov 13, 2012 at 9:43 PM
Just sparking.
Is there any alternative to teracopy, as it is 5 yr old?
Nanducob
Nov 14, 2012 at 10:12 AM
Terracopy is not good.Fast copy is the fastest,search for reviews:)

Terracopy is not good.Fast copy is the fastest,search for reviews:)
Hrishi
Hrishi #8
Nov 16, 2012 at 6:02 AM
Don't these Fast-Copying applications cause certain level of physical damage to the storage device ???
I find my WIndows 8 file copying mechanism good enough.
Nanducob
Nov 16, 2012 at 9:30 AM
Read this:12 File Copy Software Tested for Fastest Transfer Speed
Flash
Flash #10
Nov 16, 2012 at 11:07 AM
Read this:12 File Copy Software Tested for Fastest Transfer Speed

Thanks NanduCob. That's an interesting article.
Will give a try on Fastcopy.

FastCopy 2.08 (57 seconds)
ExtremeCopy Pro 1.5.1 (57 seconds)
TeraCopy 2.12 (65 seconds)
QCopy 1.0.2 (409 seconds)

Seriously, why anyone would want a software-copier that can copy ultra-slower than all other copiers? :evil:
Zangetsu
Zangetsu #11
Nov 16, 2012 at 1:36 PM
All this file copier uses a mechanism for copying speed...which default windows copy doesn't.

like if u cancel copying in windows it will cancel all the file copied..but in case of Teracopy chunk of file remains...

also copying speed also depends on Hardware...like we see in SSD
Nanducob
Nanducob #12
Nov 16, 2012 at 8:39 PM
Thanks NanduCob. That's an interesting article.
Will give a try on Fastcopy.
ah..that was easy:D

Fast copy utilises the full potential during transfers from pc to my classless(lol) Sdmmc,whereas the windows default copy lags and gets stucks alot.
topgear
topgear #13
Nov 17, 2012 at 6:13 AM
^^ Thanks for the link - I'll try out extreme copy.
Flash
Flash #15
Nov 17, 2012 at 1:23 PM
super copier or try windows 8

Supercopier at the bottom, in the list shared by Nanducob.

FastCopy 2.08 (57 seconds)
ExtremeCopy Pro 1.5.1 (57 seconds) *
TeraCopy 2.12 (65 seconds) *
RichCopy 4.0.217 (66 seconds) *
KillCopy 2.85 (74 seconds)
Ultracopier 0.2.0.15 (75 seconds)
PerigeeCopy 1.2 (75 seconds) *
Robocopy (75 seconds)
Windows 7 (76 seconds)
Copy Handler 1.32.276 (77 seconds) *
MiniCopier 0.5 (79 seconds)
Copywhiz 4.0 Build 3 (82 seconds)
SuperCopier 2.2 (86 seconds) *
Roadkil’s Unstoppable Copier 5.2 (86 seconds)
QCopy 1.0.2 (409 seconds)
C
chandanbs #18
Nov 17, 2012 at 7:10 PM
However teracopy may not be suitable for copying many small sized files!
topgear
topgear #19
Nov 18, 2012 at 3:37 AM
^^ my experience is exactly the opposite .. have you tried the latest beta version ( 2.3 ) ?
C
chandanbs #20
Nov 19, 2012 at 2:32 PM
^^ my experience is exactly the opposite .. have you tried the latest beta version ( 2.3 ) ?

No. I've been using an older version!
let me try the new beta you've suggested! Thanks!
R
Dec 11, 2012 at 12:31 PM
Thank you for your answer
A
Jun 25, 2017 at 12:28 PM
If are really serious about increasing your file transfer speed then I would suggest you try GS Richcopy 360. It provides 100% multi threaded file transfer and even lets you automate your file transfer. There are many features in it that the listed software here doesn't provide. Give it a try, hope it helps!
topgear
topgear #23
Jun 28, 2017 at 8:15 AM
For all of the file copying softwares I've tried none of them are a lot better than windows copying speed as it greatly depends upon hardware limitation.

The only reason file copying softwares are useful to me is for the feature of pausing and resuming an active transfer.
Nanducob
Nanducob #24
Jun 29, 2017 at 8:19 AM
For all of the file copying softwares I've tried none of them are a lot better than windows copying speed as it greatly depends upon hardware limitation.

The only reason file copying softwares are useful to me is for the feature of pausing and resuming an active transfer.
Same with all the people trying to increase internet speeds lol... change the plan first
W
Jun 29, 2017 at 5:32 PM
More than speed I wanted software that can copy files & folders with exactly same time stamps(created date,modified date etc) & turned out it is much harder to do compared to finding free copying software with pause/resume etc.Even now the only 2 free tools I found worth using were made years ago but the plus side is that both are based on MS own tool.
bssunilreddy
Jul 16, 2017 at 4:07 PM
Supercopier at the bottom, in the list shared by Nanducob.

FastCopy 2.08 (57 seconds)
ExtremeCopy Pro 1.5.1 (57 seconds) *
TeraCopy 2.12 (65 seconds) *
RichCopy 4.0.217 (66 seconds) *
KillCopy 2.85 (74 seconds)
Ultracopier 0.2.0.15 (75 seconds)
PerigeeCopy 1.2 (75 seconds) *
Robocopy (75 seconds)
Windows 7 (76 seconds)
Copy Handler 1.32.276 (77 seconds) *
MiniCopier 0.5 (79 seconds)
Copywhiz 4.0 Build 3 (82 seconds)
SuperCopier 2.2 (86 seconds) *
Roadkil’s Unstoppable Copier 5.2 (86 seconds)
QCopy 1.0.2 (409 seconds)
Any 3rd party tool can be used but minimum 8GB RAM is needed for such software to accomplish its purpose. Less RAM means slow copy speeds which ever tool you use.
avichandana20000
Jul 8, 2025 at 4:52 PM
i do not think any software can increase your copy speed if you have hardware limitations with LOW CACHE. .... what i have done ... owned a 250gb SSD....installed PRIMOCACHE and configured that SSD as a CACHE .... my copy drastically increases to near 200MB/sec from a meagre 30MB/sec.. But for any copy method smaller files will be copied with low speed and large chunks with high speed.