G
Finally giving it back to the self proclaimed moral leader of the world. Mature criticism at the right forum .
India Suggests US Set Up National Human Rights Commission | The Wire
India points out areas of 'concern' in US' rights record | Zee News
This is in return for the unwanted advice by Obama during Republic Day celebrations as well as this:
Both German and US ambassadors are interfering in matters they have no locus standi. They represent the interests of their gov. alone and have no stake in NGO issue unless the latter indeed are the non official arms of their gov's. Sponsoring NGOs gives the western countries vast infrastructure into the country to overlay any kind of mischievous acts without putting the foot in the country.
Anti-NGO action could have "chilling effect" on civil society: US Ambassador - The Hindu
German Ambassador to India Urges Support of International NGOs
The global narrative is clear - Religious conversion is not a bad thing. It is an expression of the freedoms we earned by being part of a democracy. Anyone who blocks religious conversion is undemocratic.
The global narrative has to change to - Religious conversion destroys cultures and diversity. It is cultural rape. Hinduism et. al. are the real minority religions in the world and they are endangered by a rampant virus. It is our duty as the human race to preserve these religions.
Until the latter is the globally acceptable narrative, no one can step up and utter a word about conversion.
But as it goes, from wiki
Cultural genocide has not been accepted as a term by UNO due to pressure of western countries. The same is the case in form of ICC -International Criminal Court which is not part of UN unlike International Court of Justice. Nor is it similar to Interpol in coverage.
That's the story on the surface. The ICC is really meant to serve one primary purpose: circumvent African and Asian efforts to seek restitution for colonial plunder. By controlling the arms of prosecution, the Europeans ensure they don't face the consequences of their actions. Asians did not sign the treaty but Africans fell for it.
India Suggests US Set Up National Human Rights Commission | The Wire
India points out areas of 'concern' in US' rights record | Zee News
This is in return for the unwanted advice by Obama during Republic Day celebrations as well as this:
Both German and US ambassadors are interfering in matters they have no locus standi. They represent the interests of their gov. alone and have no stake in NGO issue unless the latter indeed are the non official arms of their gov's. Sponsoring NGOs gives the western countries vast infrastructure into the country to overlay any kind of mischievous acts without putting the foot in the country.
Anti-NGO action could have "chilling effect" on civil society: US Ambassador - The Hindu
German Ambassador to India Urges Support of International NGOs
The global narrative is clear - Religious conversion is not a bad thing. It is an expression of the freedoms we earned by being part of a democracy. Anyone who blocks religious conversion is undemocratic.
The global narrative has to change to - Religious conversion destroys cultures and diversity. It is cultural rape. Hinduism et. al. are the real minority religions in the world and they are endangered by a rampant virus. It is our duty as the human race to preserve these religions.
Until the latter is the globally acceptable narrative, no one can step up and utter a word about conversion.
But as it goes, from wiki
Cultural genocide has not been accepted as a term by UNO due to pressure of western countries. The same is the case in form of ICC -International Criminal Court which is not part of UN unlike International Court of Justice. Nor is it similar to Interpol in coverage.
That's the story on the surface. The ICC is really meant to serve one primary purpose: circumvent African and Asian efforts to seek restitution for colonial plunder. By controlling the arms of prosecution, the Europeans ensure they don't face the consequences of their actions. Asians did not sign the treaty but Africans fell for it.
) could be done mutually for each other at international forums, then too good; esp. if that involves the self-appointed chaudhary of the world for whom UN has a soft spot or rather the UN is its own extension. won't comment on the NGO thing, except that the knee-jerk responses are hilarious and laughable, amply & evidently telling 'chor ki daadhi mein tinaka'!
