Innovative Gadgets/Devices Thread

Hi All

we come across so many new innovative gadgets/devices so please share your bit of info here (when u get any

)

like this I have come across is awesome...

*1.bp.blogspot.com/-suLLIjGGKW8/Tw4941WvDxI/AAAAAAAAEKs/y6PMHqMDKL0/s1600/hyt+Ti+face+mushroom.jpg

HYT H1 Titanium | HYT

it cost almost 27lacs

OMG!!!!

Wish I could afford this

7 Awesome Batman Gadgets That You Can Actually Own | Page 2

Lets be honest at 27 lacs you can buy a decent car. This will come handy if you have too much of money that you don't know what to do about

N

I own a Batman keychain.

*i.imgur.com/Nu60qpz.jpg

audiophilic said:
Lets be honest at 27 lacs you can buy a decent car. This will come handy if you have too much of money that you don't know what to do about

Exactly...but for Billionaires its just eating a piece of cake

audiophilic said:
Lets be honest at 27 lacs you can buy a decent car. This will come handy if you have too much of money that you don't know what to do about

Ehh, decent cars go upto 15 lakhs, after that you get premium luxury cars.

Do you guys remember the millionaire iphone app, that costed a lot and did nothing but showed a jewel icon on the screen, some people have too much money and being stupid can't even increase thier assets, a person who works hard for his money will never buy this watch, it looks ugly and a quick look by another person would label it as chinese/toy like, hell, for 27 lakh I would expect a metal band, I'd rather buy an omega.

tkin said:
Ehh, decent cars go upto 15 lakhs, after that you get premium luxury cars.

Do you guys remember the millionaire iphone app, that costed a lot and did nothing but showed a jewel icon on the screen, some people have too much money and being stupid can't even increase thier assets, a person who works hard for his money will never buy this watch, it looks ugly and a quick look by another person would label it as chinese/toy like, hell, for 27 lakh I would expect a metal band, I'd rather buy an omega.

No mate, this watch is highly sophisticated artwork created by the Swiss. Of course indians will never be able to make this kind of sophisticated timepieces or anything like this for the next 1000 years or so. India is doomed due to democracy and unwanted bureaucracy, and cheap minds are making it even worse. They think that something expensive is not supposed to be expensive, and want cheapness. That is why you get cheapness in india, and cheapness will not last, but it will seem attractive at first. So the 27 lack price tag is not just for the product, but the hard work behind the product, and the years or research behind the hydrological technology in watches.

Rather than buying that stupid watch at a stupider price I'll get 10 Omega's at that price and that watch will then hide under cave then.
Seriously, even if you had a billion, why on earth would you buy that? Sell your brain instead.

ithehappy said:
Rather than buying that stupid watch at a stupider price I'll get 10 Omega's at that price and that watch will then hide under cave then.
Seriously, even if you had a billion, why on earth would you buy that? Sell your brain instead.

His brain wont find takers

But let me get this straight. You say that watch is too expensive? Whats your reference scale for expensive things?

There are billionaires around who MAY buy this watch. "Expensive" is relative. This watch may not even make the slightest dent in their pockets. At the same time there are people on this very planet who wouldnt be able to buy that watch even if they save every single dime they ear/steal their entire lives.

You say you'd rather buy "10 omegas". Omegas arent expensive enough for you? Well, they are for me. But TBH, that argument you just made doesn't hold well with logic. If somebody can buy 10 omegas (not be ridiculed) then someone else has every right to buy this outrageously priced thingy and still not be ridiculed. Or am I missing something here?

Yes, I wouldnt buy this watch, but thats because I cant. But if i were rich and I could afford this watch, I would still not buy this watch. Thats just me. But there might be someone who might ; and I wont say they are stupid. They may be spoilt, but possibly not stupid.

pranav0091 said:
His brain wont find takers

But let me get this straight. You say that watch is too expensive? Whats your reference scale for expensive things?

There are billionaires around who MAY buy this watch. "Expensive" is relative. This watch may not even make the slightest dent in their pockets. At the same time there are people on this very planet who wouldnt be able to buy that watch even if they save every single dime they ear/steal their entire lives.

You say you'd rather buy "10 omegas". Omegas arent expensive enough for you? Well, they are for me. But TBH, that argument you just made doesn't hold well with logic. If somebody can buy 10 omegas (not be ridiculed) then someone else has every right to buy this outrageously priced thingy and still not be ridiculed. Or am I missing something here?

Yes, I wouldnt buy this watch, but thats because I cant. But if i were rich and I could afford this watch, I would still not buy this watch. Thats just me. But there might be someone who might ; and I wont say they are stupid. They may be spoilt, but possibly not stupid.

But but, its ugly :-D

@pranav: Well starting an argument is meaningless as always dude. But I am saying this in short, well I am watch-holic guy, I read plenty and plenty about them, and I collect them. So when I said I'd rather buy 10 Omega's in that price, I meant that Omega's price (not only Ω, there are few other brands as well) for their watches are justified. I mean yeah, they are/might be expensive to some, but not to me, that's not due to their price, that's due to their quality. iPhone is a quality product, but 45k is expensive for it. A watch's main objective is the movement, and no person will buy that HYT's Hydrolic movement over a fine and exclusive one of an Ω or a Rolex or even Longines, and at 27 lac, well as I said, is very idiotic, like some Tag Heuers out there.
I am not a billionaire, and frankly that watch wouldn't make a BIG dent in my pocket, but I will never buy it, but if I ever think spending 27 lac at a time behind a watch it'd be 10 Omega's, not that stupid thing.

^^Now thats a sensible argument

PS: that earlier post was never meant to be taken very seriously okay

ithehappy said:
@pranav: Well starting an argument is meaningless as always dude. But I am saying this in short, well I am watch-holic guy, I read plenty and plenty about them, and I collect them. So when I said I'd rather buy 10 Omega's in that price, I meant that Omega's price (not only Ω, there are few other brands as well) for their watches are justified. I mean yeah, they are/might be expensive to some, but not to me, that's not due to their price, that's due to their quality. iPhone is a quality product, but 45k is expensive for it. A watch's main objective is the movement, and no person will buy that HYT's Hydrolic movement over a fine and exclusive one of an Ω or a Rolex or even Longines, and at 27 lac, well as I said, is very idiotic, like some Tag Heuers out there.
I am not a billionaire, and frankly that watch wouldn't make a BIG dent in my pocket, but I will never buy it, but if I ever think spending 27 lac at a time behind a watch it'd be 10 Omega's, not that stupid thing.

Word

audiophilic said:
No mate, this watch is highly sophisticated artwork created by the Swiss. Of course indians will never be able to make this kind of sophisticated timepieces or anything like this for the next 1000 years or so. India is doomed due to democracy and unwanted bureaucracy, and cheap minds are making it even worse. They think that something expensive is not supposed to be expensive, and want cheapness. That is why you get cheapness in india, and cheapness will not last, but it will seem attractive at first. So the 27 lack price tag is not just for the product, but the hard work behind the product, and the years or research behind the hydrological technology in watches.

+1 Good Say !!

Can anyone tell me, what will this hydrotech achieve? I mean will it be more accurate than normal watches?

More accurate? I don't think so. Yeah, it'll be accurate than the costliest Indian watch, any Swiss watch for that matter, but I don't think it could match Omega's Co-Axial movement and it's accuracy.
Boy I'm happy with my +20 seconds/month watch, for which I paid 1/27 th of that H1's

For accuracy, Atomic watches are the way to go.
You've desire to spend behind a good movement? Take your pick from this list,
*www.elegant-lifestyle.com/legendary-watches.htm
Or,
*forums.watchuseek.com/f2/5-most-influential-important-automatics-428194.html
Or,
*www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=938031

Hey...no body is losing any money here so why to argue on a watch.
instead we all should respect the idea/innovation rather being selling brains etc.

just be on topic guys...as title says so.

Perhaps you should rename as "Innovative Gadgets/Devices ~~Thread~~ - Discussions"

Innovative gadgets huh? Okay here're somethings we can afford:
*ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41-mFLOET4L._SY450_.jpg
Amazon.com: HITOSELLER Wood Grain Red LED Alarm Clock - Time Temperature Date - Sound Control - Latest Generation: Home & Kitchen

*ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/617zL1OyOiL._SL1024_.jpg
Amazon.com: Star Wars Merchandise - R2D2 LED Alarm Clock (Size: 5" x 6"): Kitchen & Dining

I'll post some more soon.

This is gonna be "Picture-Driven" thread for sure.

The Most Innovative Products of 2012

how about this? the worlds tiniest and most accurate wave maker ~~watch~~ .. which you can buy. and the catch? costs almost as much as an omega

~ 1500$

*www.popsci.com/files/imagecache/article_image_large/articles/atomicclock.jpg

Now You Can Buy the Smallest Atomic Clock Ever Made | Popular Science

NoasArcAngel said:
how about this? the worlds tiniest and most accurate clock made .. which you can buy. and the catch? costs almost as much as an omega ~ 1500$

*www.popsci.com/files/imagecache/article_image_large/articles/atomicclock.jpg

Now You Can Buy the Smallest Atomic Clock Ever Made | Popular Science

~~That's just the soc I think, you still need a display and a power source....~~
Forget it, this just produces the waves, you need to have proper skills to build a clock with this, something 99.9% doesn't have, this is not a gadget.

Device Connectivity The SA.45s CSAC produces two outputs, a 10MHz square wave and 1PPS, both in a CMOS 0 – 3.3V format. It also accepts a 1PPS input for synchronization and provides an RS-232 interface for monitoring and control.

ithehappy said:
More accurate? I don't think so. Yeah, it'll be accurate than the costliest Indian watch, any Swiss watch for that matter, but I don't think it could match Omega's Co-Axial movement and it's accuracy.
Boy I'm happy with my +20 seconds/month watch, for which I paid 1/27 th of that H1's
For accuracy, Atomic watches are the way to go.
You've desire to spend behind a good movement? Take your pick from this list,
Elegant-Lifestyle.com
Or,
The 5 most influential & important automatics
Or,
What are the 10 best watch movements? - Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum

my watch is +/- 15 seconds a month... and it only cost 1/120 1/12 times of yours ( i think they arent cheap afterall).

i also have an analogue ventura

tkin said:

~~That's just the soc I think, you still need a display and a power source....~~
Forget it, this just produces the waves, you need to have proper skills to build a clock with this, something 99.9% doesn't have, this is not a gadget.

Click to expand...

i wont disagree with you, its a gadget for geeks

I started with Clock & everybody is continuing on the same type... :lol:

anyways nice info guys keep up the good work. :doublethumb:

Gearbox said:
Perhaps you should rename as "Innovative Gadgets/Devices ~~Thread~~ - Discussions"

Perhaps

Zangetsu said:
I started with Clock & everybody is continuing on the same type...

anyways nice info guys keep up the good work.

Perhaps

trendsetter :toast:

Hi I come to view this thread today and its a very nice thread. This is what we expect from a tech forum. Nice work @ Zangetsu

NoasArcAngel said:
my watch is +/- 15 seconds a month... and it only cost ~~1/120 ~~1/12 times of yours ( i think they arent cheap afterall).~~~~

Then it must be a Quartz. We are talking about Mechanical here.
@Zangestsu: Yeah, I know, no one is losing money! That wasn't my point anyway.

This is a good innovation for me,
*www.omegawatches.com/news/international-news/international-news-detail/2181

Nice going. What do you guys think about 85-inch 'floating' 4K Ultra HD TV? Price: $37900. :mrgreen:

*4.bp.blogspot.com/-1hq-zjURPE0/UPYgdP47XJI/AAAAAAAAFsg/oTNzTGHwl2c/s1600/CES2013-Samsung+85-inch+tv.jpg

If Nokia were on TDF, They would have posted "Lumia 920". They are already calling it as "The Most Innovative Samrtphone ever."

I think this needs to be in Chit chat.

Good thread though.

ithehappy said:
Then it must be a Quartz. We are talking about Mechanical here.
@Zangestsu: Yeah, I know, no one is losing money! That wasn't my point anyway.

This is a good innovation for me,
OMEGA Watches: OMEGA announces the first truly anti-magnetic watch movement

take a look at this :
SPARC MGS - ventura watch SA - design on time - offizielle website

Shah said:
If Nokia were on TDF, They would have posted "Lumia 920". They are already calling it as "The Most Innovative Samrtphone ever."

OIS in a smartphone? I'd say the title suits it well.

You guys well aware of Google Glasses. But this is about Google glass headset.

Yes Google Glass comes with a headset with bone-conduction speakers

Google Glass headset with bone-conduction speakers revealed in FCC filing | The Verge

What a bone conduction speakers
Well it looks like this
*cdn2.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/7492565/20130109-625A1432VERGE_verge_super_wide.jpg

It pump sound directly into your skull

know more about it here
Panasonic's bone conduction headphones pump sound directly into your skull (hands-on) | The Verge

OMG :shock:

Transparent phone
Has the transparent smartphone finally arrived? | The Verge

^^... its fake... just a concept

WTF? Why on earth would I need a transparent screen? How will one see anything?

That video doesnt even show anything that works. How on earth does anyone call that a prototype if it doesnt work?

Now this is what I say innovative...

This mammoth priced watch has made only for billionaires around the world!

This is incredible

^Google

Everything else is alright but isn't it dangerous while you're driving and have glass on for navigation? Or am I understanding it wrong?

Its safer than having to look at the dashboard for navigation. Basically they expect the users to have the intelligence to make judgement-calls as to when to use and when not to use it.

ithehappy said:
Everything else is alright but isn't it dangerous while you're driving and have glass on for navigation? Or am I understanding it wrong?

everything is showing on right top corner so I think it wouldn't be an issue

amjath said:
This is incredible

I see a lot of accidents, a small PiP on a large screen like a car windscreen is one thing, this is another.

tkin said:
I see a lot of accidents, a small PiP on a large screen like a car windscreen is one thing, this is another.

U need to read this
I used Google Glass: the future, but with monthly updates | The Verge

the razer edge, which was previously unveiled as fiona

How about this MYO - Wearable Gesture Control from Thalmic Labs - YouTube A Bluetooth bracelet that reads your muscles for wireless gesture!

Source link: *www.cnet.com.au/bluetooth-bracelet-allows-wireless-camera-less-gesture-control-339343472.htm

^ awesome with GLASS it would be soo great i guess

how is this different from leap :chinscratch:

Need no hands this time
*www.engadget.com/2013/02/26/nuia-hands-on-play-fruit-ninja-with-eye-control/

"AR setup shoots to improve your pool game"

*asset1.cbsistatic.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2013/03/05/pool_1.jpg

-A projector system for pool tables analyzes the table, and the position of the balls and cue, to help players make the best shot possible.

-Source-Cnet

what about speed

^@amjath: Watch this video
It depends on the speed you hit it with.. Trajectory/Path prediction looks pretty accurate..

^wowwww

J

Check this cool gadget. It is called Embrace +. Here is the link

audiophilic said:
Nice going. What do you guys think about 85-inch 'floating' 4K Ultra HD TV? Price: $37900.

*4.bp.blogspot.com/-1hq-zjURPE0/UPYgdP47XJI/AAAAAAAAFsg/oTNzTGHwl2c/s1600/CES2013-Samsung+85-inch+tv.jpg

are those 2 chics free with it??

audiophilic said:
Nice going. What do you guys think about 85-inch 'floating' 4K Ultra HD TV? Price: $37900.

*4.bp.blogspot.com/-1hq-zjURPE0/UPYgdP47XJI/AAAAAAAAFsg/oTNzTGHwl2c/s1600/CES2013-Samsung+85-inch+tv.jpg

None of the four dudes in the back gives even the slightest attention to the girls!
Ultimate Geeks!

Vyom said:
None of the four dudes in the back gives even the slightest attention to the girls!
Ultimate Geeks!

the question is do you?

this is super cool

Save Power,Save Electricity
*aqua-clock.com/

illuminated cables..yeah looks super cool.. guess sony made them "Xperia charging cables"

Nokia N9

Well, kind of an affordable tech thing..I'm pretty sure, i'm buying this by this year end

Sony HMZ T1 | 3D : 800$

*www.blessthisstuff.com/imagens/stuff/img_sony_hmz-t1.jpg

*www.highsnobiety.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/sony-hmz-t1-wearable-3d-headset-0.jpg

Source : click Here

"Minuum, a virtual keyboard shouldn't take up half of your smartphone or tablet screen, but it does, and it sure is ugly. If you're tired of keys hogging up precious screen space, check out Minuum -- a simple, yet intelligent single-row reinvention of the QWERTY layout."
-Source

"An early beta version for Android will be available in June for everyone who supports our Indiegogo campaign"-Minuum

^^Amazing 3D from Sony..but only 720p...1080p will take time

Zangetsu said:
^^Amazing 3D from Sony..but only 720p...1080p will take time

Even though its 720p it still provides a 3D experience that no 1080p 3DTV can match. The only comparison could be made against a 3D IMAX theater

The 1080p version comes this year btw. The 1080p oled panels are ready but will be first used in Sony alpha/nex range

^^what sony has used on those glasses Active or Passive 3D?

Zangetsu said:
^^what sony has used on those glasses Active or Passive 3D?

It's a wearable 3D TV basically. There are no glasses involved, it's discrete/glassless 3D. Twin OLED panels. 1 panel for 1 eye.

So it's neither Active nor passive, but discrete/native 3D