DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Intel Core i5 Lynnfield 2.66 GHz Tested

10 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/intel-core-i5-lynnfield-2-66-ghz-tested.116678/

S
sohancool Original post #1
May 25, 2009 at 4:24 PM
Intel's quad-core Core i5 2.66 GHz processor based on the Lynnfield core, was tested on an Intel reference-design P55 motherboard (DIBX_CRB) by forum members of XFastest. The processor accompanies 2.80 GHz and 2.93 GHz variants higher up in the series, and is expected to be priced at $196

The test bed was put through 3DMark Vantage (Performance and eXtreme settings), Cinebench R10, Queen, Photoworxx and AES tests of Everest. The GPU is of little relevance, as the CPU test 1 is what is to be looked at. At Queen, the setup with 4 cores and HyperThreading enabled, edged a dual-Xeon L5320 (8 cores) setup. It proved to be roughly 25% faster than Core 2 Extreme QX9650 at Photoworxx, and scored marginally higher than it AES.

Source + Benchmark Pics :-
*www.techpowerup.com/95162/Intel_Core_i5_Lynnfield_2.66_GHz_Tested.html
desiibond
May 25, 2009 at 4:56 PM
hmm. not sure how valid that is but it certainly doesn't look that great.

BTW, it's faster than QX6700 and not QX9650. Also, it can't be compared to Xeon's which are meant for servers and not for multimedia.

QX6700 is okay kind of processor and these benchmarks means that Intel is going to have hard time competing with Phenom II X4's.

one thing that I did not like is very high multiplier of 20x for a 2.66GHz processor. That is gonna hurt for overclocking :(
comp@ddict
May 25, 2009 at 5:28 PM
^^ LOL

High multiplier is actually gonna help!!!!

But the thing I found strange was HYPER THREADING on this procc, as u all mite remember, HT support wasn't to be there on the cheapest Core i5 procc.
dOm1naTOr
May 25, 2009 at 7:26 PM
yeah, me too wonders the same
comp@ddict
May 25, 2009 at 8:28 PM
Fudzilla says it's faster than a Phenom II X4 955 B.E., but the platform i.e. P55 + DDR3 might still cost more than old and cheap AM2+ mobos and DDR2 ram.
desiibond
May 25, 2009 at 9:20 PM
me too wondering the same!! :)
IronManForever
May 27, 2009 at 9:14 PM
So, what essentially differentiates this from Core i7? Just the socket? Intel is playing bad game.
desiibond
May 27, 2009 at 9:59 PM
socket, dual channel DDR3, lot lower clock speed, no HyperThreading,
dOm1naTOr
dOm1naTOr #10
May 27, 2009 at 10:03 PM
but the OP says, it has HT...
and btw, X4 955 is said to be competing with i7 920 and almost as fast. Then how come i5 faster than that?
Ans here comes another socket for Intel.. what are they thinking? IS it a trick to leave i7 on premium [expensive chipset] ?