DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core

14 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/intel-quad-processor-vs-dual-core.52038/

J
JamesTryForYou Original post #1
Mar 11, 2007 at 9:58 AM
Hi Which one processor should i prefer for animation , a high intel core 2 duo or better switch to a low processor of intel's core 2 quad(LAck of money),, Thanks
assasin
assasin #2
Mar 11, 2007 at 10:04 AM
Its always better to buy a low end quad core processor than a high end C2D.
Cuz a high end C2D will only hav a higher clk speed and larger cache and only 2 processing cores,but a quad core with even lower clk speed will out perform cuz of its 4 processing cores.
deathvirus_me
Mar 11, 2007 at 1:19 PM
For animation , the more the cores , the faster it gets :D ... so a quad will shine anyday :D .. get a good mobo and oc that .. u should easily hit 3 GHz atleast ..
darklord
Mar 14, 2007 at 12:26 PM
^^ Yo, please specify the heat aspect about Quads too.

Consider this scenario -
Intel QX6700 @ 3.4GHz Full Load under water = 70C+ on each core.Power Draw of ONLY the CPU MIGHT be in the range of 400W ;)

To put it bluntly, Kentsfield or Quad Core avlbl now are bloddy furnaces even though show exceptional performance.Remember that they are 2 Conroe Cores glued together,something like Smithfield,2 Prescotts glued together.
SO think about it,is it really worth spending 40-50k on it ?
C
Ch@0s #5
Mar 14, 2007 at 12:40 PM
Its best to avoid the current kentsfields as they are way too power hungry. Once the native quadcores arrive, they'd be a better deal as TDP will be much lower.
darklord
Mar 14, 2007 at 12:40 PM
Ch@0s said:
Its best to avoid the current kentsfields as they are way too power hungry. Once the native quadcores arrive, they'd be a better deal as TDP will be much lower.
couldnt agree more....
OT, Dada what are you doing here :p
sysfilez
Mar 14, 2007 at 12:42 PM
yes go for quad core cpu they will outperform dual core.
darklord
Mar 14, 2007 at 12:43 PM
sysfilez said:
yes go for quad core cpu they will outperform dual core.

And get a heater/boiler/power guzzler free of cost :D
Tech Geek
Mar 14, 2007 at 12:45 PM
low end quad
darklord
darklord #10
Mar 14, 2007 at 12:49 PM
Tech Geek said:
low end quad

you mean Q6600 ? Even that costs friggin 800$ and is based on Kentsfield so no difference at all.
C
Ch@0s #11
Mar 14, 2007 at 1:06 PM
darklord said:
couldnt agree more....
OT, Dada what are you doing here :p

Same thing u are doing... wasting my time talking to a wall :-D
R
Mar 14, 2007 at 1:18 PM
Ch@0s said:
Same thing u are doing... wasting my time talking to a wall :-D
LOL:D:D
some walls are intresting to talk to & not everyone has that ability to talk to a wall.
george101
george101 #13
Mar 15, 2007 at 12:35 PM
well can u tell me whether core2duo or pentium d is better??????
assasin
assasin #14
Mar 15, 2007 at 12:54 PM
^^^ u cant compare a C2D to a Pentium D.C2D beats the pentium D by miles.