Isnt the haswell facing serious heating issue.
Instead of soldering they have used thermal paste within the CPU to connect the inner parts which might be an issue.
Also the way rupee is and the way intel pricing it so high chances of 3770k getting cheaper looks too less.
Any concrete evidence of that.. I mean if you have the link from any reputed site confirming your doubts, please share it with us.
yes ... these 220W TDP close to 5 Ghz cpus ( FX 9000 ) are AMD's flag ship product so they can price it around 20k for sure ( similar to i7 4770k) but who knows these can cost even more and won't be a VFM deal for the most for sure.
One more thing I would like to mention is haswell indeed has support for many new features and extensions but applications taking advantages of such unique features are very less or yet to be released ( only god knows when ? ) and for most of the people they will be of no use unless softwares most commonly used stats integrating these features but this is on the devs to decide but from an average users point of view these features does not mean much so people who got a 2500k/2600l for gaming is still happy with what they have got and will be happy till a few successor of haswell comes out ( unless they can perform significantly better in many apps like SB did ) ..
I think manufacturers are now too busy to just release their half baked products to get publicity which would help with their other products rather than going to the drawing board and making a striking new product but as all the chip manufacturers are focusing mainly to the mobile market it's hard to get a new performance product for desktop and that;s why we are getting cpus with less power consumption and less OC capability based on old limitations ( haswell ) or old cpus with finer chip to achieve high clock speed and TDP based on old architecture ( FX 9000).
Manufactures should really make some new performance cpus for desktop with balanced power consumption and nice OC capability and keep it apart form mobile cpu market instead of making some fusion products which will work well in both desktop and and as a mobile platform with little modification.
Why is the oc capability a requirement at the factory level.. do you mean higher base clock rates?
The reason for my doubt is, oc is to get more juice from a processor.. above the ideal clock speeds right?!. So what is the point of uderclocking a proccy, just to increase its oc capabilities.
Also why is not a 4700 better processor than OCed 8350...you get better performance without the hassle of overclocking? dosent it justify the extra money?
Please someone help if I am missing anything, as I have this doubt from a longtime (mainly because I am afraid of OCing as it may damage the product, decrease its life time, increase heat and electricity consumption.. there by indirectly increasing the costs)...
