DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

LG Optimus Net Launched!!

39 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/lg-optimus-net-launched.147909/

krishnandu.sarkar
krishnandu.sarkar Original post #1
Oct 22, 2011 at 10:16 PM
LG silently launches Optimus Net in India for INR 10K | AndroidOS.in

Flipkart.com: LG Optimus NET P690: Mobile

LG Optimus One P500 vs. LG Optimus Net - GSMArena.com

Those who were waiting for it, go grab it now :D
coderunknown
Oct 22, 2011 at 10:37 PM
as expected, 10k is an "ok" price. but better wait for the price to come down to 9k. Galaxy Y at 7k will steal a lot of LG buyers.
MetalheadGautham
Oct 22, 2011 at 10:48 PM
10k IS actually decent IMO.

Yeah Galaxy Y will hurt almost every phone priced above 7k, android or not, simply because its "underpriced". Even if it was 7.5k it could've been ok.

Anyway, this one gives you 2x the screen resolution, 50% better camera resolution, 2x the ram (and the minimum number to make RAM feel usable) and makes the Motorola Fire XT seem like a bad buy (3.5k more for a better cam and video calls - phooey!).

I put it at highly VFM :D
skeletor
Oct 22, 2011 at 11:25 PM
hmm Optimus Net seems like an old wine in a new bottle.
Vyom
Vyom #5
Oct 22, 2011 at 11:53 PM
Comparing O-Net with O1, Optimus One still looks a winner.

I don't think a boost of 200 MHz in O-Net can compete with the inclusion of Adreno 200 graphics card in O1. Can it?

Comparison: *www.flipkart.com/mobiles/compare?ids=MOBCSVH96WTZZWMV,MOBD3FCFVANMPQX2
coderunknown
Oct 23, 2011 at 2:30 AM
both mobiles are powered by Adreno 200 GPU.
MetalheadGautham
Oct 23, 2011 at 10:00 AM
Yeah. ONet is just O1 overclocked.
thetechfreak
Oct 23, 2011 at 1:57 PM
just like the Phenom 840 is an Overclocked 635 :wink:


But I do feel the price is competitive.
Vyom
Vyom #9
Oct 23, 2011 at 9:41 PM
both mobiles are powered by Adreno 200 GPU.

Oh :|
But GSMArena shows the specifications as...
ONet: CPU 800 MHz processor, Qualcomm MSM7227T chipset
O1 : 600 MHz ARM 11 processor, Adreno 200 GPU, Qualcomm MSM7227 chipset :confused:
But I do feel the price is competitive.

Really? On Flipkart, following are the prices:

P500: Rs. 9700/-
P690: Rs. 9999/-

Also, O Net lacks the oomph, the stylish design of O1. :-D
d6bmg
d6bmg #10
Oct 23, 2011 at 10:15 PM
10K is descent starting price. Hopefully it will perform well in the market.
coderunknown
Oct 23, 2011 at 11:58 PM
Oh :|
But GSMArena shows the specifications as...
ONet: CPU 800 MHz processor, Qualcomm MSM7227T chipset
O1 : 600 MHz ARM 11 processor, Adreno 200 GPU, Qualcomm MSM7227 chipset :confused:

T for turbo. i.e. just clocked higher.
MSM7227 chipset & its variants uses Adreno200 GPU.

some report the 800Mhz proccy as Scorpion architecture based but they are not. just an overclock MSM7227.

Also, O Net lacks the oomph, the stylish design of O1. :-D

yup. thats right :-|
MetalheadGautham
Oct 24, 2011 at 12:05 AM
BTW has anyone else noticed that as far as hardware goes (and excluding iPhone from the list) you get much lower spec hardware for the money you pay for Android compared to other phones ?? Nokia's Symbian phones, Samsung's Bada phones and the current Windows 7 Phones when compared hardware-to-hardware with androids seem to have much better configuration in the ~13k range.

This goes to show how much profit companies make out of Android, and with the fact that its the only good mass platform smartphone OS around, we'll continue to get milked till Windows Phone 7 starts looking threatening.
socrates
socrates #13
Oct 24, 2011 at 9:08 AM
BTW has anyone else noticed that as far as hardware goes (and excluding iPhone from the list) you get much lower spec hardware for the money you pay for Android compared to other phones ?? Nokia's Symbian phones, Samsung's Bada phones and the current Windows 7 Phones when compared hardware-to-hardware with androids seem to have much better configuration in the ~13k range.

This goes to show how much profit companies make out of Android, and with the fact that its the only good mass platform smartphone OS around, we'll continue to get milked till Windows Phone 7 starts looking threatening.

Lol well put, they have been milking us for sometime now. Of course Andriod lovers will be up in arms about this :D
A
a2mn2002 #14
Oct 24, 2011 at 10:13 AM
What is the -ve effect of low (150 mb) memory ? In gaming specially ?
coderunknown
Oct 24, 2011 at 11:07 AM
low internal memory won't cause any problem. no performance issue.

but if you install ton of apps, then the internal memory will feel a bit low. mainly cause even if you move apps to external memory, some parts are left in phone memory or if you wish to use bundled widget, app must reside in phone memory.
Skud
Skud #16
Oct 24, 2011 at 11:27 AM
BTW has anyone else noticed that as far as hardware goes (and excluding iPhone from the list) you get much lower spec hardware for the money you pay for Android compared to other phones ?? Nokia's Symbian phones, Samsung's Bada phones and the current Windows 7 Phones when compared hardware-to-hardware with androids seem to have much better configuration in the ~13k range.

This goes to show how much profit companies make out of Android, and with the fact that its the only good mass platform smartphone OS around, we'll continue to get milked till Windows Phone 7 starts looking threatening.


Sad but true.
M
Minion #17
Oct 24, 2011 at 10:20 PM
as expected, 10k is an "ok" price. but better wait for the price to come down to 9k. Galaxy Y at 7k will steal a lot of LG buyers.


For 7k galaxy y is a winner very pleasing design have a Broadcom iv processor which can support upto 1280p resolution videos and theoretically supports upto 20 Mega pixel only downside is 2 mega pixel camera and 1200 mAH battery.
MetalheadGautham
Oct 25, 2011 at 9:46 AM
For 7k galaxy y is a winner very pleasing design have a Broadcom iv processor which can support upto 1280p resolution videos and theoretically supports upto 20 Mega pixel only downside is 2 mega pixel camera and 1200 mAH battery.

Well no use of "support" for 1080p videos when you have 256mb of RAM.

And you also forgot the QVGA screen. Android needs atleast HVGA to maintain compatibility with most apps.
ajayritik
ajayritik #19
Oct 28, 2011 at 7:54 PM
What is QVGA?
A
a2mn2002 #21
Oct 29, 2011 at 11:19 AM
low internal memory won't cause any problem. no performance issue.

but if you install ton of apps, then the internal memory will feel a bit low. mainly cause even if you move apps to external memory, some parts are left in phone memory or if you wish to use bundled widget, app must reside in phone memory.

Any kind of lag/decrease in performance if i use live widgets, themes , skins and specially CM7.
Zangetsu
Zangetsu #22
Nov 5, 2011 at 2:31 PM
wow another budget phone under 10k.
abhinavmail1
Nov 5, 2011 at 3:24 PM
Iam waiting for nokia's answer(windows phone).
mithun_mrg
Nov 5, 2011 at 3:44 PM
i have ordered galaxy Y from letsbuy for one of my friend but can anyone tell the differences between 800 MHz Qualcomm Scorpion & 832 MHz processor of galaxyY
C
cyn!de #25
Nov 7, 2011 at 11:20 AM
Actually IMO 800Mhz for a QVGA resolution is not required, but for HVGA it is barely sufficient looking at requirements of developing android system and apps...
Debu_013
Debu_013 #26
Nov 14, 2011 at 9:37 PM
I wish for the Lg Optimus Net Dual to be launched in India, soon.

The Dual Sim version will really click as there is a gap in this segment of the market for a Dual SIM phone.

For 9K on letsbuy + coupon it seems to be the best spec-ed android handset u can get!
800MHz CPU, Adreno 200 GPU, 512MB RAM!, hardware keys(hate capacitive touch keys).
There doesnt seem to be any competition at this price bracket.
Motorola Fire XT, Samsung Ace, HTC Explorer are much more overpriced >10k.
jkultimate
Nov 15, 2011 at 10:34 AM
That's a good news..!
A
a2mn2002 #28
Nov 15, 2011 at 11:05 AM
LG optimus Net got bad reviews by tech2 and phonearena !!!!
xtremevicky
Nov 15, 2011 at 12:22 PM
Does Galaxy Y beat the Blade ?

EDIT : Amazing price :

Get Samsung Galaxy Y S5360 for just Rs. 5,990. - Sulekha Offers
Voldemort
Voldemort #30
Nov 15, 2011 at 12:36 PM
^^ Awesome Deal!
sameer.pur
Nov 15, 2011 at 6:07 PM
^^ My friend got it (Galaxy Y) for 7k in mumbai yesterday. If she could have asked me, i could have gotten her a sweet deal.
coderunknown
Nov 15, 2011 at 6:55 PM
Does Galaxy Y beat the Blade ?

EDIT : Amazing price :

Get Samsung Galaxy Y S5360 for just Rs. 5,990. - Sulekha Offers

nope. Blade is way better with better specs. yes it has a lower clocked processor but it is built on Qualcomm's own optimized architecture & got a better GPU. i heard Galaxy Y have a broadcom processor & most likely without any GPU (software rendering).

but at 6k, its worth it. Blade/XCD35 cost 2k more but easily worth the price.
S
susancts #33
Nov 18, 2011 at 10:31 AM
LG silently launches Optimus Net in India for INR 10K | AndroidOS.in

Flipkart.com: LG Optimus NET P690: Mobile

LG Optimus One P500 vs. LG Optimus Net - GSMArena.com

Those who were waiting for it, go grab it now :D

Good to see Optimus Net from LG but could have done better by keeping its weight down to around 100 grams and I think a 5 MP auto focus camera is a must in a 10,000 rupees phone.
A
a2mn2002 #34
Nov 18, 2011 at 10:46 AM
Why the sites giving the LG Optimus Net bad reviews ? It is same as Optimus One with some changes then why ??
ajayritik
ajayritik #35
Nov 18, 2011 at 10:51 AM
Good to see Optimus Net from LG but could have done better by keeping its weight down to around 100 grams and I think a 5 MP auto focus camera is a must in a 10,000 rupees phone.

Agree with you on this one. Even I own a LG Optimus Net now.
R
rajeevk #36
Nov 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM
Samsung Galaxy Y is value for money. The only thing it misses is a good camera with LED flash but in Rs.7,000 what else you want.
coderunknown
Nov 18, 2011 at 4:21 PM
^^ what more it misses: a bigger screen with a proper resolution. 240X320 is ok for a 2.8" but not for a 3". though looking at the price you can't complain buy its wise to invest in a mobile with a HVGA screen. at least most app/games will be supported.

further more, 256Mb ram is way too less. some mobile ships with around 400Mb ram. this should be bare minimum.
d6bmg
d6bmg #38
Nov 18, 2011 at 8:23 PM
^^ what more it misses: a bigger screen with a proper resolution. 240X320 is ok for a 2.8" but not for a 3". though looking at the price you can't complain buy its wise to invest in a mobile with a HVGA screen. at least most app/games will be supported.

further more, 256Mb ram is way too less. some mobile ships with around 400Mb ram. this should be bare minimum.

That's the main point to consider.
S
susancts #39
Nov 21, 2011 at 10:05 AM
Samsung Galaxy Y is value for money. The only thing it misses is a good camera with LED flash but in Rs.7,000 what else you want.

True, for a 7000 rupees phone, you can't get a better deal than Samsung Galaxy Y. Dimensions make it quite a good phone to handle. Latest Android OS, 800 MHz processor and 1200 mAh battery makes it one of the best budget models in the market today.