DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

national anthem a hoax!!!

32 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/national-anthem-a-hoax.75433/

phuchungbhutia
phuchungbhutia Original post #1
Dec 11, 2007 at 7:42 PM
How true is this?

Ever wondered who is the " adhinayak" and "bharat bhagya vidhata",
whose praise we are singing? I thought might be Motherland India ! Our
current National Anthem " Jana Gana Mana" is sung throughout the
country.

Did you know the following about our national anthem, I didn't.

To begin with, India 's national anthem, Jana Gana Mana Adhinayaka,
was written by Rabindranath Tagore in honour of King George V and the
Queen of England when they visited India in 1919.

To honour their visit Pandit Motilal Nehru had the five stanzas
included , which are in praise of the King and Queen.(And most of us
thinkIt is in the praise of our great motherland!!!)

In the original Bengali verses only those provinces that were under British rule, i.e . Punjab, Sindh, Gujarat , Maratha etc.were
mentioned. None of the princely states were recognized which are integral parts of India now Kashmir, Rajasthan , Andhra, Mysore or Kerala.

Neither the Indian Ocean nor the Arabian Sea was included, since they
were directly under Portuguese rule at that time.

The Jana Gana Mana Adhinayaka implies that King George V is the lord of the masses and Bharata Bhagya Vidhata is "the bestower of good fortune".
Following is a translation of the five stanzas that glorify the King:

First stanza: (Indian) People wake up remembering your good name and
ask for your blessings and they sing your glories.

(Tava shubha name jaage tava shubha aashish maage, gaaye tava jaya gaatha)

Second stanza :Around your throne people of all religions come and
give their love and anxiously wait to hear your kind words.

Third stanza: Praise to the King for being the charioteer, for leading
the ancient travelers beyond misery.

Fourth stanza frowned in the deep ignorance and suffering,
poverty-stricken, unconscious country? Waiting for the wink of your
eye and your mother's (the Queen's) true protection.

Fifth stanza : In your compassionate plans, the sleeping Bharat (
India ) will wake up. We bow down to your feet O' Queen, and glory to
Rajeshwara the King). This whole poem does not indicate any love for the Motherland but depicts a bleak picture. When you sing Jana Gana Mana Adhinayaka, whom are you glorifying? Certainly not the Motherland.

Is it God? The poem does not indicate that.It is time now to
understand the original purpose and the implication of this, rather
than blindly sing as has been done the
past Sixty years.

Nehru chose the present national anthem as opposed to Vande Mataram because he thought that it would be easier for the band to play!!!

=================
source: *www.sikkimonline.info/national-anthem-hoax-t1838.html
azzu
azzu #2
Dec 11, 2007 at 8:20 PM
^^ i cant belive it *gigasmilies.googlepages.com/13.gif iam gettin moore and moore shocks today
Still is it true ?? the up post Explains clearly r we blind ?
wat wa nehru intended to do ??
A
amol48 #3
Dec 11, 2007 at 8:40 PM
yea it's true and too old thing !!.. But that's what we are :-D INDIANS
~Phenom~
Dec 11, 2007 at 8:44 PM
No it is not true.
kalpik
kalpik #5
Dec 11, 2007 at 8:45 PM
Is it true? REALLY! Oh wait.. I don't really care!
zyberboy
Dec 11, 2007 at 9:11 PM
^^why not?
The_Devil_Himself
Dec 11, 2007 at 9:14 PM
lolss.who the fugg give a damn!.forget it, everything is illusion\lie\hypocrisy and Im sick of it all.
Pat
Pat #8
Dec 11, 2007 at 10:16 PM
I have read this time and again everywhere..Its all crap..there isnt even 1% truth in this story!!
satyamy
satyamy #9
Dec 12, 2007 at 12:02 AM
Pat said:
I have read this time and again everywhere..Its all crap..there isnt even 1% truth in this story!!
agreed

and u all stop this non-sense :mad:
kumarmohit
Dec 12, 2007 at 1:05 AM
it might have been written at that time, but when we sing it we sing it for India, the word is wat its meaning is, not wat it is written to be:)
H
Hitboxx #12
Dec 12, 2007 at 5:34 AM
kumarmohit said:
it might have been written at that time, but when we sing it we sing it for India, the word is wat its meaning is, not wat it is written to be:)
Oh really, when was the last time you sang it?!;)

If I'd remember correctly, the last time I sang it was in '94.:oops:
A
amol48 #13
Dec 12, 2007 at 8:37 AM
Pat said:
I have read this time and again everywhere..Its all crap..there isnt even 1% truth in this story!!

It isn't CRAP as you say... check here:
Controversy exists regarding the appropriateness of Jana Gana Mana as the national anthem of an independent India. The poem was composed in December 1911, precisely at the time of the Coronation Durbar of George V, and is considered by some to be a paean in praise of "the overlord of India's destiny".

For more check this link:
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jana_Gana_Mana
ray|raven
ray|raven #14
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:19 AM
Dude,WikiPedia isnt always right.

Wikipedia is best used as a reference not as a source.

Regards,
ray
confused!!
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:51 AM
kumarmohit said:
it might have been written at that time, but when we sing it we sing it for India, the word is wat its meaning is, not wat it is written to be:)

ekdum correct!!:p
Pat
Pat #16
Dec 12, 2007 at 10:17 AM
amol48 said:
It isn't CRAP as you say... check here:


For more check this link:
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jana_Gana_Mana

As Rayraven said,Wikipedia is not always right.And yes,even I can post a lot of links to prove that its wrong.But I guess its not needed coz everybody has "google" :)
ahref
ahref #17
Dec 12, 2007 at 10:38 AM
it might have been written at that time, but when we sing it we sing it for India, the word is wat its meaning is, not wat it is written to be
Agree 100%,

Not to fall prey of RSS propaganda. They have nothing constructive to do, except creating controversies. BTW, I am hearing abt this controversie since last 20 years, and already there was a thread abt same thing in digit.

Check this *www.thinkdigit.com/forum/showthread.php?t=34847
kumarmohit
Dec 12, 2007 at 1:21 PM
Hitboxx said:
Oh really, when was the last time you sang it?!;)

If I'd remember correctly, the last time I sang it was in '94.:oops:

I sang it on 15 August 2007, Just FYI coz I was there at red fort at the time of speech!

@ ahref

Where the *#$% did RSS come into picture? I searched the source mentioned in the first post and was not able to find the mention of RSS in the source posting. I means seriously dude, how much do you know about RSS except what you have seen in the private news channels?

Before blaming RSS can you even explain me what is the full uniform of RSS, or what is the name of women wing of RSS or what is meant by Shakha in RSS terminology. Baaton pe mat jaao, apni akal lagao!
goobimama
goobimama #19
Dec 12, 2007 at 2:06 PM
Oh really, when was the last time you sang it?!
Oh we have a trip at the movie house. When the anthem starts, we start singing it loudly until the entire section of the theatre is staring at us...:)
ahref
ahref #20
Dec 12, 2007 at 4:11 PM
Before blaming RSS can you even explain me what is the full uniform of RSS, or what is the name of women wing of RSS or what is meant by Shakha in RSS terminology. Baaton pe mat jaao, apni akal lagao!
I do not need to answer your questions, because I know all these things you are asking. I know 100s of RSS wings and their full form.

I was active member of RSS and post holder for many years, attended 10s of camps of RSS, and was part of many meetings of RSS in district and state level.

Asking full uniform of RSS, I weared it many times. And I know true picture of RSS more than what you know.

What I am saying about RSS, because I know it. I first visited RSS shakha when I was 5 year old.
kumarmohit
Dec 12, 2007 at 5:11 PM
Kewl, assuming now that you are a rather knowledgeable person, I would really want to know why you do not grace me with the answers of the questions about RSS. OK let us just abandon the third question answer the first two.

More than that can you present one single irrefutable proof which says that this claim is made by RSS. Any scan of the printed paper where they claim this, any link on the RSS website with such a page. Considering that you have been with the RSS for so long, I think it would be a child's play for you to bring a single irrefutable proof.

What I want to know is if, when and how did RSS claim such a thing?
ahref
ahref #22
Dec 12, 2007 at 5:44 PM
1) Rashtriya Savika Samiti

2) Full uniform
a) Black cap
b) White Shirt
c) Belt
d) Khaki Knicker
e) Khaki Socks
f) Black shoe
g) Dand (Bamboo Stick)

Now don't tell I googled it. If you want I still remember by heart their Song.


Namstey Sada Vatasley Matr Bhoomey
Tavya Hindu Bhoomey Sukham .....


My first post in RSS was Mukhya Shikshak. (If you have some connection with RSS, you must be aware of this post and their importance)

That thing (National anthem )is surely RSS, I do not have time to collect proof. I am 101% sure. If any one don't want to believe I have no interest to make them believe.
kumarmohit
Dec 12, 2007 at 8:59 PM
While I agree that you have the appropriate knowledge and accept that you do did not goofle it (I take your word for it), I also see one more thing, the effect of what we in journalism call, The Hypodermic Syringe Theory.


It says that the audience is passive and accepts what the media says so if we tell a lie 100 times they would believe it is true.


You are saying it because you think that you are 101% sure that it is RSS but man, the fact is that you can not just go out blaming someone unless you have any irrefutable proof. If people start to believe and prosecute just becoz someone is 101% sure, we would be prosecuting almost every second person.

Please do not be blame anyone unless you have solid, irrefutable proof.

The fact of the matter is that while Indian media in general and English media in particular try to print an image of RSS as devil incarnate, the truth is that not even a single time has any court of law held RSS at fault. Twice or thrice it was banned but every time courts lifted the ban.

I am not saying that every one in RSS is pure but the fact of the matter is that just because some people are bad, we can not say that entire organization is bad.

While I am going off topic here, I am going to take that risk here. The efact of the matter is that Indian media and RSS have always been at odds because RSS is the only organization which has enough numbers that it can lauch such a public communication camapign that the entire depedence of people on media would be nullified. The media is against RSS becuase of the fact that RSS has enogh numbers that it can put entire India media out of business just by launching a word of mouth communication campaign.
ahref
ahref #24
Dec 13, 2007 at 8:41 PM
@kumarmohit
the fact is that you can not just go out blaming someone unless you have any irrefutable proof. If people start to believe and prosecute just becoz someone is 101% sure, we would be prosecuting almost every second person.
I am not blaming, I am giving my opinion and no one is going to prosecute anyone on my statement.
The fact of the matter is that while Indian media in general and English media in particular try to print an image of RSS as devil incarnate
I do not see RSS from english media angle, I see it from my 14 active years of participation in RSS activites.

RSS has very strong hidden agenda, which everyone knows and their views about Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru, Indian tricolour is not unknown to anyone.

Regarding numbers, how many active shakha of RSS runs at your area and how many people per day come in Shakha of RSS?
ahref
ahref #26
Dec 13, 2007 at 9:37 PM
Arsenal_Gunners said:
ROOOFL You posted in wrong thread:p
Yes, it was in wrong thread, I deleted it.
mayanks_098
Dec 13, 2007 at 9:38 PM
Arsenal_Gunners said:
Isnt it Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh?

yep guys,which RSS you talking about.
and regarding the topic,well,what (i think) kumarmohit said is true,that it might be that it was composed for a british king but now we sing it for our motherland only
ahref
ahref #28
Dec 13, 2007 at 9:40 PM
Arsenal_Gunners said:
Isnt it Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh?
It is women wing of RSS, read the question kumarmohit asked. What is women wing of RSS?
enticer86
enticer86 #29
Dec 13, 2007 at 9:41 PM
Yeah, i know abt this fact... but then- nobody cares here. :-|
Arsenal_Gunners
Dec 13, 2007 at 10:45 PM
ahref said:
It is women wing of RSS, read the question kumarmohit asked. What is women wing of RSS?
Sorry I missed that.
M
mrbgupta #31
Dec 13, 2007 at 11:06 PM
Tagore wrote a song long before 1971 (He died in 1941) :

'' Amar sonar bangla ami tomay bhalobasi
Tomar akash tomar batas amar prane bajay banshee".
If translated in english word by word it means :
'' My golden bengal I love you,
your sky, your air plays flute in my heart"

Tagore wrote this song when partition of bengal was not happened.
In 1971 when Bangladesh was born from pakistan this song had been selected as national anthem.
Do bangladeshis ever question that the song was not written for bangladesh rather for whole bengal?
We ,indians , only love to finger in every matter.

Hail our democracy !!!!!!!!!
go4saket
go4saket #32
Dec 15, 2007 at 12:24 PM
Its the truth and thats the reason I never sing our so called National Anthem. If there should be a National Anthem for India, it should be :Vande Maataram"