DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Need your suggestions for buy a DSLR . . .

12 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/need-your-suggestions-for-buy-a-dslr.148128/

J
jero25 Original post #1
Oct 28, 2011 at 8:30 PM
I'm planning to buy a DSLR camera . .
Budget is around Rs.40000/- . .
Need your valuable suggestions . .
Thank you . .
sujoyp
sujoyp #2
Oct 29, 2011 at 12:01 AM
Do you want a discussion or a suggestion :D just kidding

Write down what will you shoot , any brand preference, budget of lenses in future ;)
W
Nov 2, 2011 at 12:48 PM
I'm planning to buy a DSLR camera . .
Budget is around Rs.40000/- . .
Need your valuable suggestions . .
Thank you . .

He he .... answer what sujoy asked.
Meanwhile, with that budget I can suggest you to the superb Nikon D5100 @ 38k MRP. Check out else where at 35k if am nt wrong. This comes only with basic lens.
sujoyp
sujoyp #4
Nov 2, 2011 at 1:47 PM
yaah if I have to give a vague suggestion I will say get D5100 with 18-105 lens....thats a good combo to start
prabhu.wali
Nov 3, 2011 at 11:50 PM
may be he can get the d3100 body only and go for the sigma 18-200mm lens *www.flipkart.com/cameras/lenses/it...ref=7492014a-15ae-464b-a6d6-0f0a8e5f85a4.what say?
sujoyp
sujoyp #6
Nov 4, 2011 at 8:50 AM
Naah sigma 18-200 is not at all a good lens...people do not recommend it anywhere...if anyone want all in one solution get nikon 18-200 VR or Tamron 18-270

Else get canon combo with 18-135 lens ...

Better go for D5100+18-105 for now and get a 55-300 VR later
prabhu.wali
Nov 4, 2011 at 9:18 AM
but i thought optically sigma was on par with the nikon and its was the build quality that was the downside in the sigma
Zangetsu
Nov 4, 2011 at 10:22 AM
but i thought optically sigma was on par with the nikon and its was the build quality that was the downside in the sigma

sigma is good but the number of service center in India is very very less as compared to Tamron & Nikon :grin:

@jero25: get the Nikon D5100.
sujoyp
sujoyp #9
Nov 4, 2011 at 11:09 AM
sigma 18-200 is a compromise at every level...no lens stabilisation...less sharp then Nikkor 55-200 ....no image stabilisation soo poor in low light....have distortion above 150mm...unusable at 200mm :D

The tamron 18-270 I am talking about cost nearly 27k and have IS and much better
sujoyp
sujoyp #11
Nov 4, 2011 at 11:48 AM
I would also love to have a 18-200 lens but all good lens of this range cost more then 25k...Nikon 18-200 VRII cost more than 35k :(
prabhu.wali
Nov 4, 2011 at 2:40 PM
sadly yes and even more for the fixed aperture