Maybe you can't read English or have trouble reading/understanding it

Samsung is alive because they make quality products which are bought all over the world, and will be continued for a while too, by intelligent people mostly. No one really cares about what product some minority prefers.
I don't think I need to say anything about this part. Just more comedy.
As I said, Samsung and their after sales service is more than good here in India. All my family members, relatives, friends use Samsung, all of them, yes some of them had to visit SC (even for nonsense cause), and no one has ever complained about them. Yes, they are not very educated (personal experience, but that's applicable for ALL service centres) but they get the job done, and that's what matters. While my personal experience with Sony has been awful, the mobile store next to my home doesn't stock HTCs any more because of service issues, Motorola? That's a LOL. What's left? LG. Never had to visit SC, so can't say.
Way better quality? Must be so. Unlocking a bootloader craps out the image sensor data flows, ROFL. There were some glass cracking issues too if I have noticed XDA's Sony section properly (DoomLord is a friend of mine anyway). Their displays are below average for current market.
No comments about the part I bold. Yours is enough
Sure it does, in incompleteness. As I said, different league.
Another part where I shouldn't comment. What did Nokia use anyway? Or Motorola? Or LG? Samsung phones are very much durable, durability was never an issue in to any significant extent with Samsung phones. Note 3 is one of the toughest phone out there. But Motorola has pretty decent build quality too, while LG is a farce, as well as Sony.
Closed source? LOL. You sure don't posses the minimum idea about coding. We use to avoid Exynos chipset, because it's more time consuming and tough to code for Exynos. That's the only reason we opt for Snapdragons, period. Technically Exynos is a better chip than SD.
Why would I not really be a dev? I mean why would I say otherwise? Do people do that on this forum? Don't know!!!
There are no shortcomings of Exynos as I said, it's a great chip, and Samsung is the best chip maker out there too. Just because we
prefer something else doesn't make it a bad/inferior product, it's our problem to be quite honest, we are being lazy that's all.
Of course all devices have their flaws, that's what I was trying to say! Samsung's only real flaw is their software, TouchWiz i.e. (LG's software isn't any great at all, there are a lot of problems with G3's stock ROM, compilation of some part was simply horrendous, so much so that I gave up on it!). Then again there are a lot of people who prefer that, features. I personally obviously don't like that, but that's
my preference, again. That's how people should decide about a product, I mean the product which has less flaws should be the one to aim for, and that's where Samsung falls, along with HTC (but they have QC issues, along with their awful after sales service ), and that's why people buy them, and that's why they are leading in smartphone sales race, and that's why one could/should recommend them over something else quite easily.
My last phone was the Nexus 4, before that the Xperia Z, and before that the Galaxy Nexus. So I have had one Samsung phone in past four years! Commenting the above won't credit zero rupee in my bank account either. You don't need to own a BMW/Jag to know they make quality cars, it's common and simple knowledge. The problem is with peoples snobbish mind to get a rather simple point.