I am just wondering how many of us here still use Pico and specially Pine...
I use both.. still
I use both.. still
Pico & Pine
I used pico and pine sometime back but dont use it now... both of these UW software are non-free software...
I use mutt and emacs .... I've binded emacs with mutt so all the mail composing is done by emacs. MUTT is as featureful (actually more !!!) as pine.
ps: many people love PICO, so there's also a pico clone called nano , its a free software and all the key bindings of pico are same and its interface and key shortcuts are almost the same...
I use mutt and emacs .... I've binded emacs with mutt so all the mail composing is done by emacs. MUTT is as featureful (actually more !!!) as pine.
ps: many people love PICO, so there's also a pico clone called nano , its a free software and all the key bindings of pico are same and its interface and key shortcuts are almost the same...
yes... nano is also kool... ! but you know what, bad habits die hard
Mutt is rocking specially in case of using it with GPG
a.m
Mutt is rocking specially in case of using it with GPG
a.m
P
Its vi and pine for me. It my daily cup of coffee
i do.
mutt is GPL and better than PINE... I can mail my .muttrc file to anyone wishing to migrate to mutt. I am using familiar key bindings in muttrc so switching to mutt would not be a problem.
N
On most remote server pine is friend. Otherwise webmail always