playable frame rates.please post your suggestions.

anything over 30 is smooth
19-30 is good
19 is fair

^^welcome and thanks for your reply.

well you can post your frame rates also.
in nfs mw. i get 37-72 fps on high settings antilaliasing low and v sync turned off at 800x600.
average 55fps.

i think 21-30 playable..30+smooth anything below is bad...my framerates:
crysis:1600x900 at Vhi=25+fps
assassins creed:1600x900 max settings with full aa=30+
cod4:1600x900 max settings,full postprocessing and 16xAA is very playable but i havent checked the fps yet but m sure its above 30..

one thing i cant understand i play prince of persia sands of time and t2t with all settings high.
at 800x600 resolutions.
there frame rate mostly remains above 100.very rarely they comes below 60.

though in t2t i have never seen but i think it remains between 50-100.

but whenever i play nfs ug2 or mw.the frame rate at the same resolution

remains between 30-44 with all details high even antialiasing high.

when i decrease the antialiasing to its lowest value i get 30-60 fps.

why is this so?? i mean i should get more average frame rates after lowering the antialiasing.

since most of those games are old.

bad optimization and some new effects

T159 said:

bad optimization and some new effects

Click to expand...

sorry couldnt get ya.can you please reply to my query no 5.

play vegas and COD 4, u will see that COD runs a lot better despite having demanding graphics but Vegas crawls despite havin fair graphics

I totally agree with that COD 4 has good graphics yet it is comparatively light on resources

T159 said:

play vegas and COD 4, u will see that COD runs a lot better despite having demanding graphics but Vegas crawls despite havin fair graphics

Click to expand...

and not to forget crysis. i had set the texture, water and another detail which i dont remember now to high and environment or something like that and rest details to low.

still i think i got 20-30 fps.

an on low settings i think got 25+ fps.