[Query]Ext. HDD- which removal policy better?

6 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/query-ext-hdd-which-removal-policy-better.195754/

Dear All,

I have my 3 TB Seagate ext. hdd. permanently connected to my machine via USB 3.0 port. I use it mostly to store my downloaded files and install games.
My query is- if i opt for the 'better performance' option under the removal policy section (pls see image), will there be a significant performance boost?
Also after enabling that, for the 'write-caching policy' section, shall i enable both the options? I think as long as I have a UPS connected, i am fine in an instance of power outage. Please confirm.

Thanks,
Tanmoy.

*i.imgur.com/SsPs3N1.jpg

catching is always better - consistent reading, writing & also probably less strenuous on hdd.

icebags said:
catching is always better - consistent reading, writing & also probably less strenuous on hdd.

Its not catching but caching...
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cache_(computing)

ok, that means i should opt for the 'better performance' option under the removal policy section in order to enable write caching. Thanks a lot for your response guys.

I feel avoiding data loss is more imp than bettering Performance. even if U have UPS.
what if someday UPS itself fails? I too have a UPS & a 1 tb ext HDD permanently connected.
I have kept on the quick removal option.
U might not experience much difference in performance..
the quick removal option is esp. beneficial in cases when accidentally the cabinet gets hit,
and strong chances of usb connection getting dislodged

point noted, Pratik. Many thanks for your response.