DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Seagate 500GB or WD 640GB???????

21 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/seagate-500gb-or-wd-640gb.94334/

george101
george101 Original post #1
Jul 29, 2008 at 6:12 PM
hi guys am planning to buy a new hdd... am confused whether to buy a seagate 500gb or WD 640gb... my budget is 4k..... guys plz recommend which one to buy and suggest which brand is better, seagate or WD????

i think seagate has 5yr warranty. what abt WD?

guys plz reply fast as am getting one within 2 days
N
Jul 29, 2008 at 6:45 PM
same warranty on both and WD 640AAKS has a much better support + reliability + performance + value for money
george101
Jul 29, 2008 at 6:58 PM
but r u using WD??? coz i hav been using seagate for all these years and dnt knw anythin abt WD... can i go with WD coz 640GB is a lot of data and i dnt want to loose it anytime soon......
desiibond
Jul 29, 2008 at 7:05 PM
Both are equally reliable companies. And yes, be careful with 640Gb. :)
M
Jul 29, 2008 at 7:13 PM
seagate 500 gb has 32 mb buffer while wd has 16 mb --
N
Jul 29, 2008 at 7:14 PM
but r u using WD??? coz i hav been using seagate for all these years and dnt knw anythin abt WD... can i go with WD coz 640GB is a lot of data and i dnt want to loose it anytime soon......
all my hard drives are WD except 2 which are Seagate Cheetah + Seagate barracuda
i'd always advice WD
also Seagate has improved a lot in past yrs with their reliability issues and one should not have a problem getting it.but performance+value for money is nowhere near WD640AAKS

seagate 500 gb has 32 mb buffer while wd has 16 mb --
practically it gives a slightly better read speed but its slow in write speeds
george101
Jul 29, 2008 at 11:15 PM
wat do u mean by being careful?
amrawtanshx
Jul 29, 2008 at 11:51 PM
practically it gives a slightly better read speed but its slow in write speeds

Thats correct.
Drives with more buffer don't necessarily perform better.

And Seagate is fine too.(Replacement is easy & quick)

My 250 GB one crashed two times in 2 month ... But when I got 320 GB as replacement ... It is working well.
forever
forever #10
Jul 30, 2008 at 9:48 AM
Go for the western digital, its more value for money and performs at par with seagate.
casanova
casanova #11
Jul 30, 2008 at 11:31 AM
IMHO, WD will be a better option
george101
george101 #12
Jul 30, 2008 at 4:46 PM
i think i wil go for wd 640gb? plz correct me if i made d wrng decision.

guys i hav one more doubt. hw does hdd crash? is der anyway to knw it bfore it crashes. i dnt wnt to loose my data as it means a lot to me.
zyberboy
zyberboy #13
Jul 30, 2008 at 8:15 PM
i wud suggest seagate,wd is also good but chk if der is noise wen accessing data.
N
Jul 30, 2008 at 8:32 PM
^u mean wd makes noise?

i think i wil go for wd 640gb? plz correct me if i made d wrng decision.

guys i hav one more doubt. hw does hdd crash? is der anyway to knw it bfore it crashes. i dnt wnt to loose my data as it means a lot to me.

i'd suggest one thing-don't use windows partition utility.use gparted.coz u will lose data in case ur windows hangs during that process.use good power supply or make sure u don't underpower ur system.
And if ur drive makes some clicking noise or any noise (be it any brand) backup ur data asap and get it RMA'd
zyberboy
zyberboy #15
Jul 30, 2008 at 8:57 PM
^yes some wd models make noise compared to seagate
N
Jul 30, 2008 at 9:05 PM
WD's always silent -even the first hdds they got in india were noiseless
u might have got a bad one
george101
george101 #17
Aug 1, 2008 at 9:31 PM
Thanx for ur support guys.... i bought the WD......
desiibond
desiibond #18
Aug 1, 2008 at 10:34 PM
congrats for your purchase. how much did you pay?

post sisoft sandra benchmark results. that will help for comparisions etc.
N
Aug 1, 2008 at 10:36 PM
and HDTach

i have this hdd too so i'll try to do the same
george101
george101 #20
Aug 2, 2008 at 4:49 AM
i got the WD for 4.6k....... am frm kerala......
N
Aug 2, 2008 at 11:35 AM
high..
4200 bucks everywhere