DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Six-core Intel processors coming this year!

28 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/six-core-intel-processors-coming-this-year.83008/

soumya
soumya Original post #1
Mar 19, 2008 at 10:03 AM
*www.neowin.net/images/news/logos/intel_new.gif

Intel announced Monday that it expects to ship a six-core processor to OEMs in the second half of this year. With 1.9 billion transistors and 16MB of L3 cache, the six-core chip, code-named Dunnington, will be built with Intel's new 45 nanometer (nm) technology, according to Pat Gelsinger, a senior vice president and general manager of Intel's Digital Enterprise group. "The big cache and six cores will give customers a nice bump in performance," Gelsinger said during a press briefing today to talk about the company's product roadmap and its upcoming Intel Developer's Forum slated to be held next month in Shanghai.

This announcement comes after AMD confirmed that it has started shipping its triple-core Phenom processors just last week, and again pushes Intel well-ahead of its chief rival. However, it's not necessarily a terribly damaging development for AMD. According to Dan Olds, an analyst with the Gabriel Consulting Group, "for AMD, it just means that they're falling a little bit further behind...a six-core is a big deal, but most desktop software can't really take advantage of dual-core yet..."

Source
T
The Conqueror #2
Mar 19, 2008 at 10:05 AM
yes, I think at this rate, within 2 years octacore(8-core processor) will be launched.
I will directly jump to octacore rather than six core :D
lol crysis 2 will require 10 cores or what :D :D
MetalheadGautham
Mar 19, 2008 at 3:35 PM
there already octo and hexadeca(16) cores flooding the markets. This is a mindless core war. They should instead concentrate on upgradability, vfm and performance.
Zeeshan Quireshi
Mar 19, 2008 at 4:51 PM
there already octo and hexadeca(16) cores flooding the markets. This is a mindless core war. They should instead concentrate on upgradability, vfm and performance.
No it's not .

There actually are softwares that can take advantage of Quad-core and Octa-Core and software developers , multimedia creators definitely do take advantage of them .
goobimama
Mar 19, 2008 at 5:00 PM
Isn't L3 cache kinda crappy? I thought L2 was the important stuff...
a_k_s_h_a_y
Mar 19, 2008 at 5:03 PM
L2 is ok ! but L1 which is built right into processor's core matters hell ...!
PCWORM
PCWORM #7
Mar 19, 2008 at 5:28 PM
being a mid-range user,,My only area of interest is that the price of Quad-Cores will go down!
Zeeshan Quireshi
Mar 19, 2008 at 9:58 PM
being a mid-range user,,My only area of interest is that the price of Quad-Cores will go down!
Q6600 is already quite affordable .

I'm waiting for 45 nm Quads to hit the market before i buy my next pc .
gxsaurav
Mar 19, 2008 at 10:06 PM
The general purpose applications are not even dual core optimised yet & they are relesing quado core. :rolleyes:

Core 2 Duo E8200 is my favorite. 2 cores are enough for home use & even workstation use if you know how to work properly. It supports SSE4.1, 45nm fabrication means low heat & temperature, more cache.....well, E8200 is a CPU anyone can use easily for next 4 years unless into gaming. Buy once & forget about anything else...

Although with Intel Neahlam core coming, it doesn't makes sense to upgrade to E8xxx series if u already got a dual core system
iMav
iMav #10
Mar 19, 2008 at 10:09 PM
ok tht means quad gonna get cheaper ... im waiting
akshaykapoor_3
Mar 19, 2008 at 10:43 PM
No it's not .

There actually are softwares that can take advantage of Quad-core and Octa-Core and software developers , multimedia creators definitely do take advantage of them .


whch sofwtares r u talking abt .. ??...m using Q6600 but as all knw, all d 4 cores r never used.. So i feel that my PC is kind of working in a limited mode ( i.e less than what it can actually perform ) :(
Faun
Faun #12
Mar 19, 2008 at 10:53 PM
will upgrade on 8 cores , no point in running after things
goobimama
goobimama #13
Mar 19, 2008 at 10:57 PM
^^ What about 16 cores? ;)
Faun
Faun #14
Mar 19, 2008 at 11:01 PM
^^nope am settled on 8 :)

Its useless to run for every new upgrade, make a discrete checkpoint and stick with it
H
hellgate #15
Mar 19, 2008 at 11:18 PM
will upgrade to hexa core once it hits the market and prices come down a little.
gxsaurav
gxsaurav #16
Mar 20, 2008 at 12:05 AM
Hmm....save some money guys.

A typical upgrade cycle should be of 4 years for non gaming computers. I upgrade my computer with every new release of Windows. So my next upgrade will be in 2011 when Windows 7 comes, till then dual core is enough for non-gaming CPU.

90% of the consumer level software out there are not optimized for dual core. Have a look, is MS word optimized for Dual core???? (it doesn't even need dual core). So why jump for multi-core CPU thinking of the future when u know that in future there might be something else tempting to buy.

I say stick to all the cores u have right now. For anything non-gaming or non-Pro use Quad Core is useless. The next major intel revision is nehalam core so upgrade to that if u like by March 2009 & stick to that new architecture till 2012 easily.

I myself won't be upgrading my computer for next 4 years. There is no need to upgrade...
max_demon
max_demon #17
Mar 20, 2008 at 12:53 AM
i myself will directly jump to Alienware Area 51 ALX , it has been 2 years since i las t upgraded
kumarmohit
Mar 20, 2008 at 1:43 AM
Man imagine gaming on this!
fun2sh
fun2sh #19
Mar 20, 2008 at 7:49 AM
i will wait for the centillion core! lol
centillion means 10^300 :mrgreen:
Faun
Faun #20
Mar 20, 2008 at 7:52 AM
i will wait for the centillion core! lol
centillion means 10^300 :mrgreen:
I hope u can tolerate the old age miseries or perhaps ur grandchildren will enojoy the luxury of centillion cores.
gary4gar
gary4gar #21
Mar 20, 2008 at 11:42 AM
hmmm 6 core Cpu
Looks Intel is getting ready for Windows 7 as it be a better bloatware than Vista is:p


Just joking:D

I have observed a P4 running at 3ghz is faster than a c2d running at 2ghz. as most apps do not use 2 cores:(

why can't devs make applications to use the available processor power?
gxsaurav
gxsaurav #22
Mar 20, 2008 at 4:58 PM
Why can't devs make applications to use the available processor power?

It's a slow process. The industry has always been about single core & more MHz, or dual CPU but dual core came just a while ago, I wonder why developers don't make such apps maybe it takes lots of re-coding. The multi core optimized compilers are already available.
ssdivisiongermany1933
Mar 22, 2008 at 12:47 PM
Earlier it was mindless gigahertz war , now its shifted to core war. lets whats going next one ...Mindless wars
Cool G5
Cool G5 #25
Mar 22, 2008 at 2:29 PM
What's the use of 6 cores,when no apps can't even utilize 2 cores to their full capacity?

Anyways,those with big pockets will go for upgrade,i will be upgrading next year.
Lets see what does 2009 brings out. :cool:
napster007
Mar 22, 2008 at 2:37 PM
i myself will directly jump to Alienware Area 51 ALX , it has been 2 years since i las t upgraded

is alienware available in india???? i don't think they even ship here
praka123
praka123 #28
Mar 22, 2008 at 6:12 PM
@gary:isnt linux got SMP and SMT support already(hence faster) that means these quad/octo core are may be utilized fine.but I dont know on the application side :)

well,my dream of seeing Pentium 5 is over :lol: