DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Sli Or Crossfire?

15 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/sli-or-crossfire.30486/

S
supersaiyan Original post #1
Jun 20, 2006 at 12:15 AM
i have a friend who is filthy rich. he wants to assemble a gaming rig and he has no budget boundaries. keeping this in mind and the products available in india i decided to get him pretty high end config. now the only problem is whether i should get a crossfire setup(x1900xtx powercolor) or a sli setup(gainward 7900gtx). on this basis i will also decide the mobo.
K
Jun 20, 2006 at 3:09 AM
The SLI technology from nVidia is better because if u connect two graphics cards using SLI u will get very high performance...(though u can only link 2 graphics cards of the same model)...however if u go for ATI's crossfire (which claims linkage between ANY TWO ATi chipset cards) the two cards will perform at the level of the lower of the two cards, which obviously is not good! I read this in an IEEE magazine once...so i leave it upto u goku!
deathvirus_me
Jun 20, 2006 at 8:01 AM
if he can afford to crossfire two X1900XTX .. then make sure he gets that ...
D
Jun 20, 2006 at 10:17 AM
2 X1900XTX's in Crossfire is definitely better.
samrulez
Jun 20, 2006 at 1:32 PM
2 1900tx would be gr8!And better than 7900s...
What are the other components he is going for??
S
Jun 20, 2006 at 2:24 PM
knaadhan said:
The SLI technology from nVidia is better because if u connect two graphics cards using SLI u will get very high performance...(though u can only link 2 graphics cards of the same model)...however if u go for ATI's crossfire (which claims linkage between ANY TWO ATi chipset cards) the two cards will perform at the level of the lower of the two cards, which obviously is not good! I read this in an IEEE magazine once...so i leave it upto u goku!
but i am getting two identical x1900xtx. so i don't think there would be any problem of lower performance. just imagine the power of that system. drooooolll
thetopcyborg
Jun 20, 2006 at 2:27 PM
man! ur friend is gonna game like hell with dual-x1900xtx in crossfire...PLS TELL THE OTHER COMPONENTS OF HIS PC
C
cyrux #8
Jun 20, 2006 at 3:56 PM
What about the nvida 7950 Gx2 ??

Can this card be used in sli mode ? That would make 4 7900GT...
D
Jun 20, 2006 at 4:27 PM
No chance of getting that in India.
\/endett/\
Jun 20, 2006 at 4:40 PM
What would happen if some1 uses FireGL or Quadro FX for gaming purposes..i mean..they r meant for workstations,but what if they r used for gaming...r they better than x1900xtx and 7950x2 ?
deathvirus_me
Jun 20, 2006 at 5:20 PM
Well ... SLi the 7950GX2 would be a nice idea ... but there is no official support for that yet ... and the performance increase from a single 7950GX2 is only about 3-4 fps .. seriously ..... u still don't have a CPU not bottlenecking a SLi setup .... yess even a FX62 is a SLi bottleneck ... so even that won't be a good CPU for a Sli'ed 7950GX2 ... not unless u can afford Two Dual Core Opteron 285's .. running with 16 MB of ram etc. etc ....
S
Jun 21, 2006 at 12:56 AM
\/endett/\ said:
What would happen if some1 uses FireGL or Quadro FX for gaming purposes..i mean..they r meant for workstations,but what if they r used for gaming...r they better than x1900xtx and 7950x2 ?
No no these gfx cards are specifically meant for workstations. nothing else. these gfx cards specialize in workstations like making movies,etc. not gaming.
thetopcyborg
Jun 21, 2006 at 12:39 PM
deathvirus_me said:
not unless u can afford Two Dual Core Opteron 285's .. running with 16 MB of ram etc. etc ....

umm....it shud be 16GB of RAM instead of 16 mb, lol...
C
cyrux #14
Jun 21, 2006 at 2:01 PM
Just for the info Asus, giagabyte and most of the other board manafacturers are providing nvidia 7950 gx2 @ $600 (27000) and msi is giving @ $550 (25000)
D
Jun 21, 2006 at 4:59 PM
But those are US prices. In India these things will cost atleast 50% more.