DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

The Linux Counter.

31 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/the-linux-counter.83580/

ray|raven
ray|raven Original post #1
Mar 26, 2008 at 9:43 AM
Since we have quite a few folks on the forums moving to linux,
I thought we could have a thread where we could list all registered linux users.

For those who dont know where to register,
The Linux counter @ *counter.li.org/
maintains a list of all registered linux users.

And according to it ,
There are 140526 persons registered.
and India currently has 2769 users.

*counter.li.org/reports/all-users.png

1. rayraven -#431442
2. The Unknown - #467572
3. abhinandh - #468642
4. phreak0ut - #468643
5. FilledVoid - #461740
6. hullap - #467643
7. Cool G5 - #468647
8. Sunny1211993 - #468772
9. Garbage - #468778
shady_inc
Mar 26, 2008 at 9:54 AM
The miniature version of The Linux Counter is The Ubuntu Counter ;)
nileshgr
Mar 26, 2008 at 10:38 AM
I am registered user - #467572
ray|raven
Mar 26, 2008 at 10:40 AM
^Added.
abhinandh
Mar 26, 2008 at 10:49 AM
iam registered user - #468642
phreak0ut
Mar 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM
Mine is: 468643
ray|raven
Mar 26, 2008 at 10:56 AM
^Added abhinandh and phreak0ut
F
FilledVoid #8
Mar 26, 2008 at 11:25 AM
My Number on the Linux Counter Project is 461740 .
My Ubuntu Counter Number is 19931
ray|raven
Mar 26, 2008 at 11:28 AM
^Added.
nileshgr
nileshgr #10
Mar 26, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Why are you putting this "Added" message ? huh. no need to do that. btw, where ru addin it ?
ray|raven
ray|raven #11
Mar 26, 2008 at 11:41 AM
^First post, And ok i wont put added. :p
nileshgr
nileshgr #12
Mar 26, 2008 at 11:44 AM
^First post, And ok i wont put added. :p
Hm.. cool. you need not say added to everyone. :) just modify your post. let my xam tomorrow finish and I will write a web-based program where we can add linux users which will show up on a page.
ray|raven
ray|raven #13
Mar 26, 2008 at 11:46 AM
^Cool,If its JSP lemme know, i know a bit of JSP.
hullap
hullap #14
Mar 26, 2008 at 12:03 PM
me is #467643
Cool G5
Cool G5 #15
Mar 26, 2008 at 12:10 PM
Registered User :468647
Proud to be a linux user. :)
M
mehulved #17
Mar 26, 2008 at 12:26 PM
This topic is has been discussed more than 2 times if my memory serves me right.
praka123
praka123 #19
Mar 26, 2008 at 9:11 PM
I dont really care for this endeavour.'coz we cannot really,accurately count the Linux users.really!!!
still,I had registered there(forgot,its 4-5 yrs back :p ).
rather than carrying "registered linux user" in ur siggy,why dont we carry some promos like *getgnulinux.org or *whylinuxisbetter.net ?it atleast let others know about Linux :)
PcEnthu
PcEnthu #20
Mar 27, 2008 at 2:52 PM
@Praka, I just referred the Disk fragmentation section of the 'Why linux is better' site. The explanation for the fragmentation problem is quite ambiguous.

she keeps track, on a piece of paper, of contiguous empty drawers. When a new file arrives, she searches this list for a sufficiently long row of empty drawers, and this is where the file is placed. In this way, provided there is enough activity, the file cabinet is always tidy.

1. Surely there will be situations where there will be no "contiguous empty drawers" to store a large file and the OS will be forced to store the file in random locations

2. Is it logical to think that, windows will not store the files in contiguous empty spaces and will always store in random empty places
F
FilledVoid #21
Mar 27, 2008 at 3:06 PM
@Praka, I just referred the Disk fragmentation section of the 'Why linux is better' site. The explanation for the fragmentation problem is quite ambiguous.



1. Surely there will be situations where there will be no "contiguous empty drawers" to store a large file and the OS will be forced to store the file in random locations

2. Is it logical to think that, windows will not store the files in contiguous empty spaces and will always store in random empty places

Out of curiosity what in the world are you talking about? Was this posted in the wrong thread?
hullap
hullap #22
Mar 27, 2008 at 3:10 PM
@Praka, I just referred the Disk fragmentation section of the 'Why linux is better' site. The explanation for the fragmentation problem is quite ambiguous.



1. Surely there will be situations where there will be no "contiguous empty drawers" to store a large file and the OS will be forced to store the file in random locations

2. Is it logical to think that, windows will not store the files in contiguous empty spaces and will always store in random empty places

A THING CALLED PM
PcEnthu
PcEnthu #23
Mar 27, 2008 at 3:15 PM
Out of curiosity what in the world are you talking about? Was this posted in the wrong thread?

Sorry for Hijacking the thread :( But I really got into to fragmentation part of linux :D It seems like a mystery to be solved for me :D
ray|raven
ray|raven #24
Mar 27, 2008 at 3:20 PM
^No idea abt other file systems , but xfs uses a delayed allocation strategy to cope up with fragmentation.
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xfs#Online_defragmentation
And please ask a mod to make a new thread with these posts.
PcEnthu
PcEnthu #25
Mar 27, 2008 at 3:42 PM
^No idea abt other file systems , but xfs uses a delayed allocation strategy to cope up with fragmentation.
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xfs#Online_defragmentation

Thanks for the link @ray

And please ask a mod to make a new thread with these posts.

I guess i will learn some more about the fragmentation and start a new thread, if i am still in the doubts land. Fellow members are already warming up. They will jump on me 4 sure, if i continue this stuff without stuff :grin:
S
Mar 27, 2008 at 5:03 PM
#468772 here-a happy ubuntu user!
Garbage
Garbage #27
Mar 27, 2008 at 6:04 PM
Though I'm using Linux from 2-3 years, I've never registered !!

Registered now !!

Registered Linux User #468778
S
Smoke #29
Mar 28, 2008 at 1:57 AM
For those who dont know where to register,
The Linux counter @ *counter.li.org/
maintains a list of all registered linux users.

And according to it ,
There are 140526 persons registered.
and India currently has 2769 users.

cant agree with this

even 2769 users are still using windows......in the form of Active Window Maximized Window Minimized window etc..:rolleyes:
nileshgr
nileshgr #30
Mar 28, 2008 at 10:10 AM
cant agree with this

even 2769 users are still using windows......in the form of Active Window Maximized Window Minimized window etc..:rolleyes:
damn you. he means WIN32SUX from M$ :mad: :evil:
abhinandh
abhinandh #31
Mar 28, 2008 at 2:04 PM
cant agree with this

even 2769 users are still using windows......in the form of Active Window Maximized Window Minimized window etc..:rolleyes:
lol*www.v-rodforums.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl3.gif