It was just a syndicated news story, and we're waiting to review this new product if it's ever launched. If we get our hands on it, we will be able to comment and rate and rank...
Also remember, we're not "reporters" out there looking for "scoops", we're just geeks like you guys, looking to rip apart everything we get our hands on. However, we also need to publish news, which we do from other sources, and the source for this "news" was clearly mentioned. We claim no "originality" of reporting here, and even gave a link to the original article...
Is it a bogus claim? Probably, but I wouldn't just blindly put all my faith into some random blog by someone who knows as little about the product as you or me.
I've had people point out security flaws in TD's code, and their English skills were so bad that we were barely able to communicate with them. Engineering or coding talent is in no way related to spoken language skills in my experience.
Raabo bro, we know you are such and such and such... but randomly syndicating nonsense from various sources without a dint of verification doesn't make Digit magazine look any good.
THIS. a million times this.
people will believe ANYTHING on the internet as gospel without even looking at the credentials/sources/citations.
i do kinda trust digit (operative word is trust, because you guys have earned it over close to 9 years, for me, atleast), but would i blindly follow a story that was posted, without applying my own brains?
no.
you guys have brains, and atleast some technological bent to your thinking. apply your skills and reveal the truth!
EDIT : WTH is wrong with bbcode today? its the 2nd time its goofed up -.-
That article can't be taken seriously. Looks more like rant than presenting the facts.
Coming to both of you now, I suggest you to read the article properly again. It is VERY WELL BACKED up by facts. It clearly states 3 things with proper facts:
1. The OS is not independently developed. It has to do something with Novell.
2. The UI is clearly KDE if you look at the news video or the picture, which means he hasn't developed the UI either.
3. He's unable to explain the working principles of his so-called RevoBook to people who question him. Instead he ends up confusing them even further with incoherent information. See the comment thread image on that page.
Any guy who has the slightest knowledge of the functioning of Unix-based systems will be able to comprehend the whole story.
You think memes and sarcasm are the reasons why you cannot trust the article? No one tells you to "trust" it. Just apply your knowledge and think over it deeply. You'll get what I'm trying to convey.
What he claims as an invention isn't an invention in the real sense.