DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Urgent help needed (DOS)

11 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/urgent-help-needed-dos.144208/

C
chirayu garg Original post #1
Jul 25, 2011 at 12:55 AM
I copied some file from a Win Xp system having FAT32 file system to a hard disk connected as slave.
The hard disk has DOS installed as OS and have FAT as file system.
The content of folder I copied on to the hard disk is visible in windows system. But when I boot the hard disk in DOS only the folder is being made and the contents inside is not shown.

Please Help.
gameranand
Jul 25, 2011 at 7:08 AM
Use Ubuntu Live CD and copy your data where you want. In Ubuntu if its there most probably it will show.
mithun_mrg
Jul 25, 2011 at 9:18 AM
Try using the Dir/a command & see
Prime_Coder
Jul 25, 2011 at 3:04 PM
yes, the dir /a command really works very well. you can view all files in the directory with this command. you can also provide attributes like dir /ah for looking hidden files or dir /as for looking system files.
C
Jul 25, 2011 at 4:34 PM
None of my files are hidden or have any other attributes, so above solutions are of no use.
I will explain again, the contents of the folder are visible in windows Xp when the HDD is connected as slave, but when I boot the HDD, it shows that only the folder is made and inside it no files are there.
Any more intelligent solutions ppl.
mithun_mrg
Jul 25, 2011 at 4:45 PM
^^ what is the type & size of the files ur coping on ur DOS HDD

also the root folder in Fat16 can manage a maximum of 512 entries. The use of long file names can significantly reduce the number of available entries.
C
Jul 25, 2011 at 4:46 PM
Actually its an old DOS based software, contains some *.dat* , *.h* and one *.exe* file.
And the size of the entire folder is about 2mb and the size of the HDD is 128MB :)
mithun_mrg
Jul 25, 2011 at 4:54 PM
I think u should use DOSBOX to run that on ur new PC rather then wasting time on the old 128MB HDD
Prime_Coder
Jul 25, 2011 at 5:00 PM
+1 to DOSBOX :)
I also wanted to suggest the same! Using the Dosbox on Windows XP will be useful.

@OP reply back after using DOSBox to let us know it the problem still persists.
gameranand
Jul 25, 2011 at 6:54 PM
Yeah +1 for Dosbox.