DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Vista sets 2007 land-speed record for copying and deleting

31 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/vista-sets-2007-land-speed-record-for-copying-and-deleting.77512/

praka123
praka123 Original post #1
Jan 6, 2008 at 10:23 AM
It's been almost nine months since we first reported on Windows Vista's inability to copy, delete and move files without stalling indefinitely, and yet the problem continues.
*regmedia.co.uk/2007/12/20/long-goodbye.jpg
Screenshots relayed this week by two Reg readers say it better than we ever could. "48167 Days and 23 hours remaining," one of them reads. "36843 Days and 0 hours remaining," states the other. Both are Vista's best-faith guesses as to how long it will take to copy data from one location to another.
"I have been experiencing slow copying ever since I 'upgraded' to Vista earlier this year, particularly from USB keys & drives," writes Adrian Procter, the Reg reader who provides Screenshot 1 (right). When Procter tried to create a CD with just 168Mb of pictures, Vista told him it would take more than 131 years to complete the job.


continue

from comments section of article:
"Vista told him it would take more than 131 years to complete the job"

Just in time for the next MS upgrade then!

"Apparently not, as you can plainly see by the enclosed screenshot"

And who told her that it hasn't improved? Without SP1, it might have reported 52837 days and 14 hours remaining!
:D
..and may be the DRM in vista which is resp for all this!as it may be verifying each and every bit of data!
axxo
axxo #2
Jan 6, 2008 at 2:39 PM
now that tells Vista is future proof....:D
Voldy
Voldy #3
Jan 6, 2008 at 3:58 PM
Now Vista keeps going better and better :D
Gigacore
Jan 6, 2008 at 4:00 PM
Great! ROFL
CadCrazy
Jan 6, 2008 at 5:26 PM
Can't stop laughing :D
nvidia
nvidia #6
Jan 6, 2008 at 5:29 PM
Lolz!!!
N
Net007 #7
Jan 6, 2008 at 5:31 PM
funny.:D
goobimama
Jan 6, 2008 at 6:54 PM
When we recently got a new machine, I was surprised that the dealer has put XP on it instead of Vista (I wanted XP anyways). So I asked him the reason for this.

"Array. Almost everyone complains that they have paid for a fast machine but is slower than their older machine. I've had to downgrade so many of them to XP so I have started installing XP to begin with..."
anand1
anand1 #9
Jan 6, 2008 at 7:06 PM
It's not so happened with me. I have been using it on my Laptop for almost 6Months and never ever had such problems. We must follow the system requirements before it's installation and then see the magic 3D look and many of it's features.
goobimama
goobimama #10
Jan 6, 2008 at 7:15 PM
Magic 3D look! Laughing out loud and rolling on the floor, laughing!
anand1
anand1 #11
Jan 6, 2008 at 7:17 PM
Magic 3D look! Laughing out loud and rolling on the floor, laughing!

Yes there are many new features on having it. And only by means of few comments one can never defy its features.
H
Hitboxx #12
Jan 6, 2008 at 7:21 PM
*Piss*ta
x3060
x3060 #13
Jan 6, 2008 at 7:24 PM
131 years, LOl :-D
axxo
axxo #14
Jan 6, 2008 at 8:06 PM
When we recently got a new machine, I was surprised that the dealer has put XP on it instead of Vista (I wanted XP anyways). So I asked him the reason for this.

"Array. Almost everyone complains that they have paid for a fast machine but is slower than their older machine. I've had to downgrade so many of them to XP so I have started installing XP to begin with..."

true...and if you tell this MS geeks will tell you to tweak the OS. Why should anyone do this? If vista can perform any better only after tweaking..why dont ms release tweaked version of the same??
A
Jan 6, 2008 at 8:15 PM
Yes. I too experienced such type of problem. For me, it said 320 days.
alsiladka
alsiladka #16
Jan 6, 2008 at 10:41 PM
Must say its hilarious!!! Does not take that long to copy, but its fun to see the estimates!!
CadCrazy
CadCrazy #20
Jan 6, 2008 at 11:11 PM
I already locked one thread . Stop flaming otherwise i'll lock this one too :-D
casanova
casanova #21
Jan 6, 2008 at 11:13 PM
It's because of the algo that calculates the time, if for some file the speed drops, the estimated time left for remaining data size is calculated at that speed. No1 wud complain if a download dialog would go that long coz of drop in speeds.
CadCrazy
CadCrazy #23
Jan 6, 2008 at 11:48 PM
Last warning stop laughing out laud. Otherwise i'll ban you
CadCrazy
CadCrazy #25
Jan 6, 2008 at 11:58 PM
Respect others integrity n don't you know i am new mod
axxo
axxo #27
Jan 7, 2008 at 9:56 AM
new mad :D
CadCrazy
CadCrazy #28
Jan 7, 2008 at 1:18 PM

What wrong with you. You are saying
New Mod = New Mad :D

Dude you need a good eye specialist . Jaldi de apna ilaz karvao :D
goobimama
goobimama #29
Jan 7, 2008 at 1:23 PM
Can some read mod come and ban this "Mad"?
maverickrohan
Jan 8, 2008 at 6:18 PM
WTF ... This is a well documented problem, I thought it was only happening to me!!! Vista is pretty awesome leaving aside this major bug and all other bugs related to this ... basically the "BUGGY WINDOWS EXPLORER"

I get so many updates, but still there is nothing which has fixed the "BUGGY WINDOWS EXPLORER"

Wake UP M$!!!!!!!