Want to buy new mobile ....under 32 k , please suggest....

R

1. Budget? -- under 30K-32 k.

2. Display type and size? -- aprrox 5" ,doesn't matter.

3. Dual sim? -- Not a must, but if yes its good.

4. Preferred choice of brand? HTC 820 dual, SAMSUNG s5 or Galaxy Note 3, Xpearia z2 or other

5. camera option (flash, front facing camera)? -- Mainly for camera. Front facing and rear must be great. above 10 megapixel with good quality

6. Preferred operating system? (Android, iOS, Windows Phone, etc). -- Preferably Android with great features....

7. Preferred connectivity options (3G, 4G ready). -- Yes, 3G and 4G with Wifi

8. Primary use of handset (multimedia, camera, internet, gaming etc)? -- Internet,camera, gaming with PAD

9. Any specific mobile phones in consideration? -- Nope.

10. Any other -- excellent battery backup life. Uses camera and internet very often. ESP front camera.

You went from low to mid budget within one thread :-D

.
Well I can suggest you checking out Z2 since it is fulfilling all your requirements but the self cracking problem still persists there.
If you are not on early horse to buy in a week or so you should hold your purchase. New flagship will be shown of in MWC in march and it will result in a considerable fall in price of older gen.
But still if you want a phone with good battery life and camera and also like features you can go for S5 as well.

Samsung galaxy S5 has the best camera among android smartphones. Get it....

G

Get the Samsung galaxy s5 snapdragon version. Its better.

Btw you are going to start a flame war by posting this thread

K

samsung display and camera is oversaturated and touchwiz is a major bloat
the google play edition ones are still ok-ok but id still suggest the xperia Z series over samsung
I suggest you give windows phone a try ,it ticks all the boxes and beats most other android phones by a huge margin in terms of battery life and cameras(Lumia line up especially)

kkn13 said:
samsung display and camera is oversaturated and touchwiz is a major bloat
the google play edition ones are still ok-ok but id still suggest the xperia Z series over samsung
I suggest you give windows phone a try ,it ticks all the boxes and beats most other android phones by a huge margin in terms of battery life and cameras(Lumia line up especially)

Xperia Z series self cracking :-D

K

$hadow said:
Xperia Z series self cracking

yeah i know,it was already mentioned in this thread though so i didnt repost

Get a Moto X (2014) instead

K

^^ quite agree!! dunno why i forgot about the Moto X,it even has a sony exmor sensor on it so its got a good shooter as well

T

kkn13 said:
^^ quite agree!! dunno why i forgot about the Moto X,it even has a sony exmor sensor on it so its got a good shooter as well

It's criticised for its cam in most of the reviews, doesn't produce the right colors.

E

@OP :then go for Xperia Z2, or I say go for Z3, if you can stretch that budget a little bit, as camera is your main concern.
Else my recommendation would be in this order, Note 3, S5, S4, Htc M8 Eye. If you want the best of everything (apart form the UI) then you can consider S5 too. Second best display, IP67 certification, a robust build, there's very little wrong with the phone. You can get the Note 3 for a bigger display, S Pen too, it's still an excellent phone. I would have strongly recommended the M8 Eye if only I had seen a proper review of the phone, but I think it's worth a shot, and believe me Sense is so much better then TouchWiz.

- - - Updated - - -

anupam_pb said:
Samsung galaxy S5 has the best camera among android smartphones. Get it....

This is not entirely true mate. While S5 is a great and capable shooter undeniably I still think Xperia lineup has its own advantages. I mean where these Samsungs fail is in night situations. I haven't seen any Samsung doing great in low light. Yes S5 might have better rating in DXO, that's right too, but that includes 120 fps video recording, well that thing alone can make it better in paper than anything, but for real photo shooters, for those who can and do play with manual settings I think a Z2 or Z3 will be a better option than S5. The low light capabilities of Z series are really nice, significantly better than S series of Samsung I think.

- - - Updated - - -

SaiyanGoku said:
Get a Moto X (2014) instead

Guy wanted a phone for camera purposes mainly, and you are suggesting something which has a below average camera? Moto X 2014's camera is a slight improvement over Moto X 2013's camera, while 2013 X's camera was one of the worst of its kind.
Next time if you are unsure about what to post, just refrain, a kind request to you.

kkn13 said:
^^ quite agree!! dunno why i forgot about the Moto X,it even has a sony exmor sensor on it so its got a good shooter as well

A Sony sensor which was used in S4 and G2 (I could be wrong about the LG model, not my thing) and while both of them were fantastic shooters, Moto X 2014 did something to mess up on the software part, leaving with a below average camera on it, which produces way off colours, way off saturation, WOW.

- - - Updated - - -

kkn13 said:
samsung display and camera is oversaturated and touchwiz is a major bloat
the google play edition ones are still ok-ok but id still suggest the xperia Z series over samsung
I suggest you give windows phone a try ,it ticks all the boxes and beats most other android phones by a huge margin in terms of battery life and cameras(Lumia line up especially)

This message deserves an award,

*i.imgur.com/8fUpXID.gif

Look at that statement
[MENTION=159164]$hadow[/MENTION]: I do need fresh air. Referred from your suggestion in another topic.
:facepalm:

G

[MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION] could you prove all Samsung devices having "oversaturated" "display" and "camera". I'd be happy.

@OP you could go for Sony xperia z2 or z3 for the best camera mobile out there but the screen cracking issues are present.

otherwise my vote still goes for Samsung s5 snapdragon version

you could go for exynos version if you want better music quality as it has wolfson dac

K

gamefreak4770k said:
[MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION] could you prove all Samsung devices having "oversaturated" "display" and "camera". I'd be happy.

its obvious,plus samsung quality build quality and touchwiz bog it down badly
@ op get Moto X

- - - Updated - - -

the.one said:
It's criticised for its cam in most of the reviews, doesn't produce the right colors.

still its better than samsungs oversaturated results imho
(ps-these are my views,doesnt apply to everyone)

- - - Updated - - -

im not bothering typing a reply to eureka
if you cant put your views forth without lame personal attacks,you probably shouldnt be in a public forum

G

[MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION] please put up some links proving that display and camera are oversaturated from reliable websites or even if you get a member backing you on that opinion i shall agree with you

- - - Updated - - -

I'm not attacking or anything I'm just asking to prove.

its the last thing we want in forum people giving wrong advice

K

gamefreak4770k said:
[MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION] please put up some links proving that display and camera are oversaturated from reliable websites or even if you get a member backing you on that opinion i shall agree with you

The era of inaccurate AMOLED screens is over
only the tab s series has lost the oversaturation..

- - - Updated - - -

*www.tomsguide.com/us/iphone-5s-vs-galaxy-s5-cameras,review-2190.html
*www.phonearena.com/news/Samsung-Galaxy-S5s-screen-is-far-from-the-best-heres-why_id56255
*www.phonearena.com/reviews/Screen-comparison-Galaxy-S5-vs-iPhone-5s-vs-One-M8-vs-Note-3-vs-Nexus-5-vs-G2_id3652
*www.extremetech.com/computing/177119-177119
*androidandme.com/2014/04/devices/htc-one-m8-versus-the-samsung-galaxy-s5-camera-shootout/

T

I would still not suggest spending 30+ k on any of last yrs phones.

Very few have LTE / 64 bit chips, hence they're less future proof. I guess u won't want to pay a premium for devices that lack these.

K

gamefreak4770k said:
I'm not attacking or anything I'm just asking to prove.

its the last thing we want in forum people giving wrong advice

yeah i know

G

Nice answer. I agree with oversaturated screen. Isn't that inherent property of AMOLED display? Did Motorola invent New AMOLED screen?

in case of camera not for me it wasn't sufficient proof. Only one website stated oversaturated camera and that also in some situations. But you got me.

Samsung has saturated display but camera is only little saturated that's also in some situations

still in my opinion @op get Samsung s5 snapdragon version it also has 4g compatibility in India

K

gamefreak4770k said:
Nice answer. I agree with oversaturated screen. Isn't that inherent property of AMOLED display? Did Motorola invent New AMOLED screen?

in case of camera not for me it wasn't sufficient proof. Only one website stated oversaturated camera and that also in some situations. But you got me.

Samsung has saturated display but camera is only little saturated that's also in some situations

still in my opinion @op get Samsung s5 snapdragon version it also has 4g compatibility in India

We don't get Snapdragons in India.And Exynos is crap.

Go for Moto X2 32 GB or LG G3.
Don't worry about it's camera.
Mine N6 camera beats iP6+ in normal daylight conditions.

Anyways HDR will do it's part and next update will bring raw photography to X2 also.

My vote for
Moto X2
LG G2 or LG G3 (if it's in your budget.)

G

kunalgujarathi said:
We don't get Snapdragons in India.And Exynos is crap.

Go for Moto X2 32 GB or LG G3.
Don't worry about it's camera.
Mine N6 camera beats iP6+ in normal daylight conditions.

Anyways HDR will do it's part and next update will bring raw photography to X2 also.

My vote for
Moto X2
LG G2 or LG G3 (if it's in your budget.)

dude Samsung has launched 4g Samsung s5 in India and it has snapdragon chipset

K

samsungs amoleds are notorious for being oversaturated,even more than other brands' amoled displays
im gonna stick with my opinion-Moto X
even LG G2/G3 is worth checking out if you dont mind the larger display

I think the @OP left :lol:

LG G2/G3/G Pro 2 are also good options. :thumbs:

A

gamefreak4770k said:
dude Samsung has launched 4g Samsung s5 in India and it has snapdragon chipset

Eureka... deleted account created new one???

it's priced about 53K at launch... where is it now??? provide some link for buy...
Samsung Galaxy S5 4G With Snapdragon 801 Launched at Rs. 53,500 | NDTV Gadgets

I don't understand samsung strategy.. they not even use their brain.. they launch mobile everyday, same old mobile with 1 additional feature.. so nobody look at them.. I love their note series (snapdragon), other things are ****..

32K = moto x 2014 is good choice..
I can suggest you note but just don't buy it, because of its non-snapdragon. Exynos are crap. Not good enough at that price comparable to snapdragon.

Check out this ones..
Motorola Moto Maxx 2015, Motorola DROID Turbo 2015
ZTE Nubia X6, ZTE Nubia Z7, Xiaomi Mi4

the.one said:
It's criticised for its cam in most of the reviews, doesn't produce the right colors.

That is one of the main drawback of the phone. Kinda crappy camera.

E

kkn13 said:
still its better than samsungs oversaturated results imho
(ps-these are my views,doesnt apply to everyone)

Hold on, so this nuts is saying that Moto X 2014's camera is better than S5's camera? And not a single person has said anything about that? That's beyond unbelievable!

I don't understand! I am quite sure this person is mentally challenged, or has been living under a cave for too long. Sorry, if this sounds like personal, then be it.

:facepalm:

kkn13 said:
if you cant put your views forth without lame personal attacks,you probably shouldnt be in a public forum

Why don't you let me worry about where I should be, and you do some brain works in the mean time?

- - - Updated - - -

amit.tiger12 said:
Eureka... deleted account created new one???

Yes and No. Black_Mamba's password reset could not be sent to my email ID, so had to create this one! I can't delete an account, can I? Don't see the relevance of this comment though!

Anyway, these are some results of phones like Note 3, S5, Note 4 etc, from DisplayMate, I think they hold a slight bit of more credibility than some random college kid.

*www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_S5_ShootOut_1.htm

*www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note3_ShootOut_1.htm

*www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note4_ShootOut_1.htm

And DXOMark of S4, S5 etc,

Samsung Galaxy S5 overview: Joint leader in DxOMark Mobile rankings - DxOMark

Samsung Galaxy S4 overview: Does bigger mean better? - DxOMark

You might be able to find Moto X 2014 or any Moto there, if you start to count from opposite side, you know what I mean? :lol:

Someone looking at a phone for camera mainly, and that too at 32k, and he's been suggested with Moto X 2014, I mean I literally don't know what the hell is wrong with this place. This should be seen as on of the the Misguide Ultimatum ever happened on internet, and ironically these nuts were talking about misguidance at first place.

PERIOD.

C

Sony was aaid to reduce price by 14% see if you can get z3c in a week

K

eureka said:
Hold on, so this nuts is saying that Moto X 2014's camera is better than S5's camera? And not a single person has said anything about that? That's beyond unbelievable!

I don't understand! I am quite sure this person is mentally challenged, or has been living under a cave for too long. Sorry, if this sounds like personal, then be it.

Why don't you let me worry about where I should be, and you do some brain works in the mean time?

- - - Updated - - -

Yes and No. Black_Mamba's password reset could not be sent to my email ID, so had to create this one! I can't delete an account, can I? Don't see the relevance of this comment though!

Anyway, these are some results of phones like Note 3, S5, Note 4 etc, from DisplayMate, I think they hold a slight bit of more credibility than some random college kid.

*www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_S5_ShootOut_1.htm

*www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note3_ShootOut_1.htm

*www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note4_ShootOut_1.htm

And DXOMark of S4, S5 etc,

Samsung Galaxy S5 overview: Joint leader in DxOMark Mobile rankings - DxOMark

Samsung Galaxy S4 overview: Does bigger mean better? - DxOMark

You might be able to find Moto X 2014 or any Moto there, if you start to count from opposite side, you know what I mean?

Someone looking at a phone for camera mainly, and that too at 32k, and he's been suggested with Moto X 2014, I mean I literally don't know what the hell is wrong with this place. This should be seen as on of the the Misguide Ultimatum ever happened on internet, and ironically these nuts were talking about misguidance at first place.

PERIOD.

dude stop your nonsense
going by your stupid personal attacks i can conclude you are actually [MENTION=99398]ithehappy[/MENTION] with a new account
stay on topic or dont post at all
im not bothering to post a reply to your "reasoning" be happy with your "righteous" opinions

A

eureka said:
Don't see the relevance of this comment though!

Actually I mentioned it because your earlier post reply was monitored because of harsh words, and moderators remove those people. So I thought, may be your account was deleted and after that you created new one.
(Actually I want to delete my account..)

eureka said:
Anyway, these are some results of phones like Note 3, S5, Note 4 etc, from DisplayMate, I think they hold a slight bit of more credibility than some random college kid.

And DXOMark of S4, S5 etc,

Nobody talked about camera because there was nothing to complaint about...

S5 camera is good, but I think its not the best.. It's good camera with features..
Now, after reading again what OP wants, mainly good camera phone.. then Samsung S5 is sure for you.. I doubt about 4G model...
And snapdragon version is not there for s5 (India) and display is good also..
Go and buy S5 only for camera and display for viewing images.

M

@OP if you are not a samsung fan get one plus one or xiaomi Mi4 and save money they are very good VFM even Zenphone 2 looks good.

A

Minion said:
@OP if you are not a samsung fan get one plus one or xiaomi Mi4 and save money they are very good VFM even Zenphone 2 looks good.

Or wait for xiaomi Mi 5 or note 2

amit.tiger12 said:
Or wait for xiaomi Mi 5 or note 2

IMO, Zenfone 2>>>Mi5 or Note 2

MIUI is resource hungry.

@OP wait for Zenfone 2 or Zenfone Zoom

A

SaiyanGoku said:
IMO, Zenfone 2>>>Mi5 or Note 2

MIUI is resource hungry.

@OP wait for Zenfone 2 or Zenfone Zoom

zenfone 2 with intel processor, intel is going to take over snapdragon market, buy 4 gb model, 2gb is also good..

G

kkn13 said:
samsungs amoleds are notorious for being oversaturated,even more than other brands' amoled displays
im gonna stick with my opinion-Moto X
even LG G2/G3 is worth checking out if you dont mind the larger display

did Motorola invent New amoled display?

does even Motorola manufacture amoled display?

please explain differences between moto and Samsung's amoled

K

gamefreak4770k said:
did Motorola invent New amoled display?

does even Motorola manufacture amoled display?

please explain differences between moto and Samsung's amoled

what are you talking about???
samsung doesnt make Moto X display fyi
samsung makes its own displays on its devices and are oversaturated,just see the colours on the display of any of their products,its looks unnatural and too colourful(in a bad way imho)
Moto X's display or even any of my other amoled displays at home dont look unnatural like samsung
this is my honest opinion,i know some of my friends who prefer samsung also
its all down to preference

eureka said:
Hold on, so this nuts is saying that Moto X 2014's camera is better than S5's camera? And not a single person has said anything about that? That's beyond unbelievable!

I don't understand! I am quite sure this person is mentally challenged, or has been living under a cave for too long. Sorry, if this sounds like personal, then be it.

Why don't you let me worry about where I should be, and you do some brain works in the mean time?

....

Someone looking at a phone for camera mainly, and that too at 32k, and he's been suggested with Moto X 2014, I mean I literally don't know what the hell is wrong with this place. This should be seen as on of the the Misguide Ultimatum ever happened on internet, and ironically these nuts were talking about misguidance at first place.

PERIOD.

can you have a civil discussion? yes or no?

E

ico said:
can you have a civil discussion? yes or no?

Yes brother, if someone stops trolling. Civil discussions can only happen when all users are logical and all the comments based on facts. Don't know why you bold the part about misguide ultimatum, that part is uncivil? I beg you to please ask yourself that.

- - - Updated - - -

kkn13 said:
what are you talking about???
samsung doesnt make Moto X display fyi
samsung makes its own displays on its devices and are oversaturated,just see the colours on the display of any of their products,its looks unnatural and too colourful(in a bad way imho)
Moto X's display or even any of my other amoled displays at home dont look unnatural like samsung

[MENTION=26711]ico[/MENTION]: What are you going to say about this mate? People who don't posses basic knowledge can rant here like that? Again I am saying, I have no idea what's actually the problem with this guy!

- - - Updated - - -

kkn13 said:
going by your stupid personal attacks i can conclude you are actually [MENTION=99398]ithehappy[/MENTION] with a new account

I don't understand this comment at all! Why would I care to attack someone personally? You have a lot of problems with basic knowledge, whats ending up in miserably misguiding others, and I simply crossed your comments, that is not personal attacks, at least I didn't mean it that way. What I don't understand is in a place like this, which is so popular (that's why I joined this community) how could people accept such ludicrous statements!

eureka said:
Yes brother, if someone stops trolling. Civil discussions can only happen when all users are logical and all the comments based on facts. Don't know why you bold the part about misguide ultimatum, that part is uncivil? I beg you to please ask yourself that.

[MENTION=26711]ico[/MENTION]: What are you going to say about this mate? People who don't posses basic knowledge can rant here like that? Again I am saying, I have no idea what's actually the problem with this guy!

I don't understand this comment at all! Why would I care to attack someone personally? You have a lot of problems with basic knowledge, whats ending up in miserably misguiding others, and I simply crossed your comments, that is not personal attacks, at least I didn't mean it that way. What I don't understand is in a place like this, which is so popular (that's why I joined this community) how could people accept such ludicrous statements!

yes, you are right in your points but why the personal attacks?

E

ico said:
yes, you are right in your points but why the personal attacks?

I didn't mean them as personal attacks. I can't make you believe that, but I know that myself. I thought if I make some harsh comments then the user would at least care to recheck his facts, but no I can't do anything to stop this friend. All up to you, if you care about this place that is. Goign by the post counts seems like you do.

K

eureka said:
Yes brother, if someone stops trolling. Civil discussions can only happen when all users are logical and all the comments based on facts. Don't know why you bold the part about misguide ultimatum, that part is uncivil? I beg you to please ask yourself that.

- - - Updated - - -

[MENTION=26711]ico[/MENTION]: What are you going to say about this mate? People who don't posses basic knowledge can rant here like that? Again I am saying, I have no idea what's actually the problem with this guy!

- - - Updated - - -

I don't understand this comment at all! Why would I care to attack someone personally? You have a lot of problems with basic knowledge, whats ending up in miserably misguiding others, and I simply crossed your comments, that is not personal attacks, at least I didn't mean it that way. What I don't understand is in a place like this, which is so popular (that's why I joined this community) how could people accept such ludicrous statements!

dude what is your problem
i believe you made a new account because you are acting exactly like ithehappy was earlier,you have been following me around the forums and putting unprovoked personal attacks all week
this is a forum,everyone is entitled to their opinion
if you dont like it,dont attack someone
also i have already added in my posts that those are my opinions,not everyone might share them and thats not a bad thing
this is a forum,keep it civil,post your views not personal hate
theres no need to derail a thread if you cant agree with the opinions of others,i even tried ignoring you completely but you still go on attacking

E

kkn13 said:
dude what is your problem
i believe you made a new account because you are acting exactly like ithehappy was earlier,you have been following me around the forums and putting unprovoked personal attacks all week

I am missing something here! I did create a new account. I lost pass of my old account black_mamba, and password reset email could never be sent to my registered email ID, that's why I was forced to create a new account! I asked one mod (name in green) to activate this account. And why in the world would I follow you around the forum? I don't understand!

kkn13 said:
this is a forum,everyone is entitled to their opinion

Absolutely. But you can't say 2+2 = 5 and say that's your opinion. Your comments need facts, and basic knowledge, which is horribly/shockingly lacking. Everyone is entitled to his/her opinion has absolutely nothing to do with that.

kkn13 said:
if you dont like it,dont attack someone

Yes, I did call you a mentally challenged person, sorry for that, but go by your previous posts and tell me what do you yourself think about your own comments? However if you haven't rechecked the facts then those comments will appear to you as logical as usual.

G

Guys don't attack each other. Let each parties prove their point. Their knowledge is thus put forth in front of the world

[MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION] could you prove Motorola manufacturing their own amoled displays?

i would even agree if any member backs you up on this theory

- - - Updated - - -

You have many amoled devices at home... That's great.... Do you know about amoled screen burn in?

K

gamefreak4770k said:
Guys don't attack each other. Let each parties prove their point. Their knowledge is thus put forth in front of the world

[MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION] could you prove Motorola manufacturing their own amoled displays?

i would even agree if any member backs you up on this theory

- - - Updated - - -

You have many amoled devices at home... That's great.... Do you know about amoled screen burn in?

amoled screen burn in is rare,its happened to one of my tabs once
i never said motorola makes its own amoleds,i said samsung and moto amoleds are different

Samsung Display CEO: Other OEMs are not licensing our Super AMOLED technology | SamMobile
Samsung Display isn't able to sell Super AMOLED tech to anyone but Samsung
Motorola Engineer Defends Moto X: Jabs at Samsung’s “Not True 1080p” Display, Calls HTC’s LCD Inferior to AMOLED, and More | Droid Life
^^posted these to prove that samsung hasnt made amoleds for other companies
im aware it makes parts for apples iphone and ipad and a few other products but those are LCD displays not amoleds

also i should add-my posts are my opinion and not everyone might agree with them(not at all a bad thing by any means,everyone has their preferences and thats a good thing)
i also wont be replying to eureka or whatever other names he is called because hes unable to have a discussion without name calling,respect of the poster and their opinions and attacks people personally for no valid reason,henceforth im gonna ignore him

E

There is not a single AMOLED panelled display out there which not made by Samsung. I have no idea about the Lumia lineup though.

Course Moto AMOLED displays and Samsung AMOLED displays are different, the former is third class, while the latter is excellent.

I really don't know how hard it is to check facts before making obscene statements!

A little from Anand,

In our saturation sweep, the new Moto X continues to be rather poor in its performance. While on Samsung phones it’s normal to see colors like this on the default display mode, there’s usually a mode that correctly constrains the display to sRGB which is the industry standard for displaying colors. There’s no such mode on the new Moto X, so the display significantly overshoots sRGB. This doesn’t bode well for the ColorChecker, which provides the most thorough look at color accuracy.

As predicted, the new Moto X does poorly in the ColorChecker. There’s really not much that the Moto X can accurately display in sRGB as just by pushing the gamut too far, even if there wasn’t saturation compression for some colors, the large gamut will cause distortion of all colors within the gamut triangle.

Unfortunately, it’s not clear where this lack of attention to color accuracy comes from. In discussions with Andrei it's clearly possible to calibrate the AMOLED panel from the GS4 quite accurately, and there's no real technical limitation for AMOLED to lack good calibration. However, judging by the relatively low peak brightness there are other issues as this could affect Motorola's performance in battery life tests. This seems to suggest that Motorola is unable to access the latest generation of AMOLED panels from Samsung Display.

This would be a rather startling thought, as it means that no matter what Motorola does to improve their implementation of Samsung’s AMOLED displays, they will always be behind the curve. If it becomes clear that Samsung’s AMOLED is the best display from a user-facing standpoint, every other OEM will face significant barriers in competition as they would be unable to access the latest generation AMOLED panels. The real solution here is for other display manufacturers such as LG, JDI, and AUO Optronics to catch up.

At any rate, the display of the new Moto X seems to be relatively poor compared to what we see in the Galaxy S5 LTE-A (and likely the Note 4), along with the iPhone 5s, Nexus 5, and One (M7). While it’s impossible to ignore the power advantage of AMOLED when implementing functions like Moto Display, the relatively low peak brightness and poor color accuracy are concerning.

Source: AnandTech | The New Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) Review

The above is the Moto X 2014 display, which is improved over Moto X 2013. I hope that says enough about the predecessor's display quality :lol:

I can link at least a hundred articles, well don't have the time, and more importantly the interest.

If someone can really ignore my posts it will be like a big gift to me. Persons who could make self made up atrocious comments should ignore everyone.

:offtopic:

by the way.

K

dude stop your bs hate
you didnt even see the links i posted,no one has licensed samsungs amoled displays yet apparently

also this is going majorly off topic and i dont want to discuss the obvious further

All right here we are on the verge of another flame war.

E

$hadow said:
All right here we are on the verge of another flame war.

Flame war? Why? No!

*secure.static.tumblr.com/5fbbb062f..._art_of_trolling_by_aliennextdoor-d576sns.jpg

I am sorry for feeding a troll.

eureka said:
Flame war? Why? No!

*secure.static.tumblr.com/5fbbb062f..._art_of_trolling_by_aliennextdoor-d576sns.jpg

I am sorry for feeding a troll.

Hence concluded that you can't have a civil discussion.

Locking this thread until further notice. No point trolling each other on a thread where OP haven't replied in a week after first post.

[MENTION=112116]rokey_4u[/MENTION]: PM me or any other mod, if you want this thread to be re-opened.