Budget 4K TVs may offer same specs but do not mistake them to compete with actual high end brands (Panasonic/Sony/Samsung)
Why?
Picture Quality of tier 1 brands are lot better
And price in multiples of X.
All high end stuff have bad vfm quotient.
Funny that you mention that. Cause Redmi Note 5 still is better than many mid ranger phones.
I would rather spend a bit extra and use the product for 3yrs rather than saving few bucks to use a inferior product which will not go beyond the 1yr warranty period. Not saying no cheap product will survive after 1yr, but still, I have seen people getting frustrated with lower end brands and then eventually go for decent reputed brand for which at least they have decent after sales services.
Redmi note 5 is not exactly cheap @15k by cheap I meant likes of lava,intex etc.I am not considering Sony due to pricing especially in their budget-mid segment but Panasonic and LG offers better Tvs with good pricing
I disagree . Let me elaborate with an example. Lets take a graphics card 1050Ti (just an example). It's a VFM for me on a certain budget for gaming. On the other hand , for my Dad who doesn't game, the IGPU is enough and for him the 1050ti is not a VFM since the product is overkill for his usage. This does not make the product itself bad but it's not VFM since my dad can't derive value from it. Hence VFM in my opinion is subjective.
First of all VFM != Cheap. I am talking about VFM. In the example I gave ,GPU is the requirement. IGPU was VFM for my Dad and DGPU wasn't. The example was to demonstrate a product was VFM for one person while for another it wasn't. Thus in my opinion VFM is subjective. You are free to have a different opinion. That's totally fine. I'm not getting into a debate on IGPU or DGPU