DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

Which is betta gma950 of fx 5200??

9 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/which-is-betta-gma950-of-fx-5200.72590/

blademast3r
blademast3r Original post #1
Nov 6, 2007 at 9:01 PM
hey guys which of these is betta in terms of performance....the onboard intel gma 950 or geforce fx 5200 agp???
debsuvra
Nov 6, 2007 at 9:19 PM
I think nVidia FX 5200 is way ahead of GMA 950. I also have a nvidia 5200 with AsRock P4I45Gx_PE (intel 845) mobo. And i can play even Chaos Theory at 34.8 FPS in 1024*768 without AA or AF.:D
Faun
Faun #3
Nov 6, 2007 at 9:37 PM
Fx5200
spitfire
Nov 7, 2007 at 11:53 AM
^^^^^ +1
A
ashnik #5
Nov 7, 2007 at 8:24 PM
external gfx chip is always better than the one onboard...most of the times..unless u r comparing 6150 onboard to rivaTNT.
s18000rpm
Nov 7, 2007 at 8:31 PM
in Intel GMA series only GMA X3000 is the best option, others are not meant for gaming.
axxo
axxo #7
Nov 7, 2007 at 8:43 PM
ATI690G is also great...no probs in playing most games
Pathik
Pathik #8
Nov 7, 2007 at 9:09 PM
x1250 isnt as good as nvidia 6150/7150 in gaming..
in intel obviously x3000 is the best..
the upcoming x3500 ll also be awesome..
axxo
axxo #9
Nov 7, 2007 at 9:12 PM
benchmark reveals x1250 is better in most games..though ati lacks shader model 3.0