Why doesn't Linux need defragmenting?

Hehe....your link came to help at the right time.I was wondering why ubuntu doesn't have a defragmentor when I stumbled here.!!

^neither do Linux needs AV,Anti-spyware..blah's...
read:
Linux.com :: Note to new Linux users: No antivirus needed
*www.linux.com/articles/60208

Yeah Good.
@Praka123 - Help me buddy,i am making my switch to linux.*gigasmilies.googlepages.com/22.gif

A small defragger written in Python can be found here:
*ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=169551

Nice Explanation

already there is defrag for ext2.u need a livecd or another distro installed containing defrag to try it.make sure u dont mount!afaik there is not any difference.with ext4 on the anvil,the idea of defrag also is not needed!.

good article . . , did you read the comment section there . . there is a war going on

Nice one. I myself am a big fan of the ext3 file system on Linux. its very stable without any hassles of defragmenting. Always gives good performance no matter how roughly you use it.