DIGIT-ARC read-only archive · snapshot: July 23, 2026

WiKiPedia to shut down for 24 hrs to protest SOPA

45 posts · originally from https://geek.digit.in/community/threads/wikipedia-to-shut-down-for-24-hrs-to-protest-sopa.151476/

dashing.sujay
dashing.sujay Original post #1
Jan 17, 2012 at 12:10 PM
*timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/wikipedia-to-shut-down-for-24-hours/wiki-jpg/thumb/11517771/wiki-jpg.jpg



Wikipedia, the popular community-edited online encyclopedia, will black out its English-language site for 24 hours to seek support against proposed U.S. anti-piracy legislation that Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales said threatens the future of the Internet.

The U.S. service will be the highest profile name to join a growing campaign starting at midnight Eastern Time on Wednesday that will see it black out its page so that visitors will only see information about the controversial Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect Intellectual Property Act.

The information will urge Wikipedia readers to contact their local congressman to vote against the bills. Other smaller sites leading the campaign include Reddit.com and Cheezeburger.

"This is a quite clumsily drafted legislation which is dangerous for an open Internet," said Wales in an interview.

The decision to black out the site was decided by voting within the Wikipedia community of writers and editors who manage the free service, Wales said. The English language Wikipedia receives more than 25 million average daily visitors from around the world, according to comScore data.

The bills pit technology companies like Google Inc (GOOG.O) and Facebook against the bill's supporters, including Hollywood studios and music labels, which say the legislation is needed to protect intellectual property and jobs.

The SOPA legislation under consideration in the House of Representatives aims to crack down on online sales of pirated American movies, music or other goods by forcing Internet companies to block access to foreign sites offering material that violates U.S. copyright laws. Supporters argue the bill is unlikely to have an impact on U.S.-based websites.

U.S. advertising networks could also be required to stop online ads, and search engines would be barred from directly linking to websites found to be distributing pirated goods.

Google has repeatedly said the bill goes too far and could hurt investment. Along with other Internet companies such as Yahoo (YHOO.O), Facebook, Twitter and eBay (EBAY.O), it has run advertisements in major newspapers urging Washington lawmakers to rethink their approach.

White House officials raised concerns on Saturday about SOPA saying they believe it could make businesses on the Internet vulnerable to litigation and harm legal activity and free speech.

"We're happy to see opposition is building and that the White House has started to pay attention," said Wales.

News of the White House's comments prompted a prominent supporter of the bill News Corp (NWSA.O) Chief Executive Rupert Murdoch to slam the Obama administration.

"So Obama has thrown in his lot with Silicon Valley paymasters who threaten all software creators with piracy, plain thievery," he posted on his personal Twitter account Saturday. News Corp owns a vast array of media properties from Fox TV, the Wall Street Journal to Twentieth Century Fox studios.

Wales said the bill in its current form was too broad and could make it difficult for a site like Wikipedia, which he said relies on open exchange of information. He said the bill also places the burden of proof on the distributor of content in the case of any dispute over copyright ownership.

"I do think copyright holders have legitimate issues, but there are ways of approaching the issue that don't involve censorship," Wales said.



Source
Liverpool_fan
Jan 17, 2012 at 3:48 PM
Good stuff by Wikipedia.
Only if Google tries do to this for only an hour. :p
R
RahulB #4
Jan 17, 2012 at 4:51 PM
SOPA Sucks.... Hope these lawmakers rot in garbage....

Good idea: Google should do something like Wikipedia...
Turn out ... many SOPA supporters inside Congress are actually pirates..
d6bmg
d6bmg #5
Jan 17, 2012 at 5:06 PM
This sucks.. :-(
1 day without study & emergency referances. :-/
Alok
Alok #6
Jan 17, 2012 at 5:12 PM
Its big turn.
Let's see what will be effect.

Good stuff by Wikipedia.
Only if Google tries do to this for only an hour. :p

that's i'm waiting for.. Really just 1 hour should be enough.
Ronnie11
Jan 17, 2012 at 6:07 PM
have heard a lot about sopa..but no idea what the bill actually is..can anyone enlighten me as to y there is so much protest about it???
Krow
Krow #10
Jan 17, 2012 at 6:33 PM
have heard a lot about sopa..but no idea what the bill actually is..can anyone enlighten me as to y there is so much protest about it???

Ronnie, when there is a thread on SOPA in this very section, why would you ask this question here? Please search before you post.

*www.thinkdigit.com/forum/technology-news/150426-sopa-death-internet-we-know.html

The blackout will harm users, no?
Liverpool_fan
Jan 17, 2012 at 6:42 PM
have heard a lot about sopa..but no idea what the bill actually is..can anyone enlighten me as to y there is so much protest about it???

What is SOPA and how does it work? The Stop Online Piracy Act explained | The Verge

The blackout will harm users, no?
Far less harm than a permanent ban on the sites in question for one infringing link. Yes the bill is THAT moronic.
Ronnie11
Ronnie11 #12
Jan 17, 2012 at 7:20 PM
Ronnie, when there is a thread on SOPA in this very section, why would you ask this question here? Please search before you post.

*www.thinkdigit.com/forum/technology-news/150426-sopa-death-internet-we-know.html

The blackout will harm users, no?

my apologies...finding it hard to search around with low internet speeds here..did read a bit of it on wiki but couldn't make much sense of it...i apologise..


What is SOPA and how does it work? The Stop Online Piracy Act explained | The Verge


Far less harm than a permanent ban on the sites in question for one infringing link. Yes the bill is THAT moronic.

Thank you for the info..much appreciated...
Krow
Krow #13
Jan 17, 2012 at 7:23 PM
No issues mate, even I didn't know you have slow internet problems. Next time, please take a look if possible.
F
ferris #14
Jan 17, 2012 at 8:47 PM
Very good decision by Wikipedia.

Hopefully lots of people wondering why Wikipedia isn't displayed tomorrow will actually read the information provided about SOPA and pressure their lawmakers about it.
Krow
Krow #15
Jan 17, 2012 at 9:02 PM
I still don't get how a blackout will help to be honest. They could achieve the same effect by a banner ad.
Liverpool_fan
Jan 17, 2012 at 9:27 PM
I still don't get how a blackout will help to be honest. They could achieve the same effect by a banner ad.

Very good decision by Wikipedia.
Hopefully lots of people wondering why Wikipedia isn't displayed tomorrow will actually read the information provided about SOPA and pressure their lawmakers about it.
:p

A banner can NEVER have that effect.
A
Jan 17, 2012 at 11:58 PM
The best thing is I dont have to submit my project in these two days.. Or else without Wikipedia I would have only my name in it and nothing else
nims11
nims11 #18
Jan 18, 2012 at 11:51 AM
^^ disable javascript and you will be able to access wikipedia
doomgiver
doomgiver #19
Jan 18, 2012 at 12:03 PM
Uncyclopedia

read and enjoy!!
d6bmg
d6bmg #20
Jan 18, 2012 at 12:17 PM
^^ disable javascript and you will be able to access wikipedia

Without disabling javascript users just have to stop loading is the page manually before it could complete to stop that redirection.
R
rajeevk #21
Jan 18, 2012 at 12:20 PM
Google's Black Out can increase the effect highly.
Vyom
Vyom #22
Jan 18, 2012 at 12:31 PM
I love the way wikipedia has handled the blackout. Not by shutting down the servers. They redirect it after a few seconds. I think it would have a greater effect. The sudden transition to black screen could be shocking to some who are not aware for the protests.

Wait till the people behind this hideous law, are faced with the questions of their children, about why Wikipedia is not working as it always do! Let them answer their sons and daughters about how Wikipedia 'break the law' by sharing information from the users all around the world! :-x
Vyom
Vyom #24
Jan 18, 2012 at 1:51 PM
if it happens, then the internet traffic will be all time low

On the contrary, it may increase. Since people would find it hard to digest that google can be shutdown, and it will create a chaos.
Also numerous other services depends on google will panic.
So yeah google should do a protest, atleast for an hour.
Krow
Krow #25
Jan 18, 2012 at 4:47 PM
Adblock plus blocks the wiki blackout.
Vyom
Vyom #26
Jan 18, 2012 at 5:08 PM
^^ disable javascript and you will be able to access wikipedia



Without disabling javascript users just have to stop loading is the page manually before it could complete to stop that redirection.


Adblock plus blocks the wiki blackout.

I don't understand why people are trying to "circumvent" the blackout. Its not entities like wikipedia who are trying to enforce a blackout. Its the absurd idea by the governing bodies that they can control Internet!

Don't forget guys, if law such as SOPA passes, then even this forum is an easy target.
Nipun
Nipun #27
Jan 18, 2012 at 6:36 PM
Minecraft.net has also joined the protestors.
Liverpool_fan
Jan 18, 2012 at 8:34 PM
Agreed with Vineet, for every effort to circumvent that stuff you should work 10 times more to fight against SOPA and PIPA.
Who
Who #29
Jan 18, 2012 at 8:50 PM
Almost all the sites i visit on regularly basis are having a blackout today and i can't help but smile as people are finally coming together to make the change they want to see but yeah it's sad that i have to do without them for a day but its all for a greater good as ACTA could be coming as well.
Arsenal_Gunners
Jan 18, 2012 at 8:54 PM
I still don't get how a blackout will help to be honest. They could achieve the same effect by a banner ad.

This is true.I am sure everyone knows this by heart now
"Please read:A personal appeal from..."
Skud
Skud #31
Jan 18, 2012 at 8:56 PM
Someone just missed a step:- ;)

*twitter.com/#!/CyanogenMod/status/159544564162641920

We are officially supporting #SOPA with a blackout. Support the cause now : google.com/takeaction
Arsenal_Gunners
Jan 18, 2012 at 8:57 PM
I don't understand why people are trying to "circumvent" the blackout.
Those who can circumvent it already know about the issue.They are not the target demographic of the blackout.
Vyom
Vyom #33
Jan 18, 2012 at 9:01 PM
Agreed with Vineet, for every effort to circumvent that stuff you should work 10 times more to fight against SOPA and PIPA.

Thanks LFC. I would like to add one more thing.
The aim of Wikipedia is not to take the wealth of information out of reach from people, but to inform them about the barbaric attempt to control Interweb.
And I think they are doing it quite impressively.

Offtopic:
@Who: Glad to have you back buddy! :)
(And to know you post too) ;)
Arsenal_Gunners
Jan 18, 2012 at 9:02 PM
Anyway,today I know I can live without Wikipedia quite easily.Bring on SOPA!
*static.tumblr.com/noiu98j/gUplb4j88/trollface.jpg
dashing.sujay
Jan 18, 2012 at 9:03 PM
US is a big b@stard. I guess without some real historical protest we won't be able to stop it if US has its way. :(
Alok
Alok #36
Jan 18, 2012 at 9:17 PM
Even moddb, filefront, gamefront , wsg all of them are blocked.
I'm going to sleep:-|.
dashing.sujay
Jan 18, 2012 at 10:24 PM
An update-

Google Inc will place a link on its home page tomorrow protesting anti-piracy measures in the US Congress, joining other internet companies demonstrating against the Hollywood-backed legislation.

Google, owner of the world's most popular search engine, and Facebook Inc are among companies opposing House and Senate bills they say they will hurt the growth of the US technology industry. Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia where users contribute entries, said it will shut the English version of its website for 24 hours tomorrow to protest the measures.

"We oppose these bills because there are smart, targeted ways to shut down foreign rogue websites without asking American companies to censor the internet," Samantha Smith, a Google spokeswoman, said in an e-mail today.

The Stop Online Piracy Act in the House and the Protect IP Act in the Senate are backed by the movie and music industries as a means to crack down on the sale of counterfeit goods by non-US websites. Hollywood studios want lawmakers to ensure that Internet companies such as Google share responsibility for curbing the distribution of pirated material.

A legislative push led by the Washington-based Motion Picture Association of America and the US Chamber of Commerce, the nation's largest business-lobbying group, has run into a backlash from Web companies that say the bills would saddle them with new liabilities and technology mandates.

'Abuse of power'
Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia, called the decision to shut the website an "extraordinary" action in response to the proposed laws, which "endanger free speech both in the United States and abroad, and set a frightening precedent of internet censorship for the world."

Wikipedia, available in 282 languages, contains more than 20 million articles contributed by more than 100,000 volunteers around the world.

The so-called blackout day to protest anti-piracy legislation is "abuse of power given the freedoms these companies enjoy in the marketplace today," Christopher Dodd, chairman of the Motion Picture Association of America, said today in an e-mailed statement.

"It's a dangerous and troubling development when the platforms that serve as gateways to information intentionally skew the facts to incite their users in order to further their corporate interests," said Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat who served three decades in the Senate.

'Publicity stunt'
Representative Lamar Smith, a Texas Republican who sponsored the House measure, also criticised the planned Wikipedia shutdown.

"The bill will not harm Wikipedia, domestic blogs or social networking sites," Smith, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said today in an e-mailed statement. "This publicity stunt does a disservice to its users by promoting fear instead of facts."

Smith said he expects his committee to resume debate over the Stop Online Piracy Act in February and didn't provide a date for when the panel would act.

The administration of President Barack Obama said in a blog post on Jan. 14 that it wouldn't support legislation that encourages censorship, undermines cybersecurity or disrupts the structure of the Internet.

Vote pending
The blog post, by three White House technology officials, marked the administration's most significant foray into the fight between content creators and Web companies playing out in Congress. The Senate is scheduled to hold a procedural vote Jan. 24 on starting debate on the Protect IP Act.

News Corp Chairman Rupert Murdoch called Google a "piracy leader" in a Jan. 14 post on Twitter, saying it streams movies for free and sells advertisements around them. A day later he wrote on Twitter that Google is a "great company doing many exciting things. Only one complaint, and it's important."

Miranda Higham, a News Corp spokeswoman, declined to comment.

Smith, the Google spokeswoman, said the company respects copyright. "Last year we took down 5 million infringing Web pages from our search results and invested more than $60 million in the fight against bad ads," she said in an e-mail.

The House Judiciary Committee debated the Stop Online Piracy Act during a 12-hour hearing last month in which lawmakers offered 60 amendments to the legislation. Panel members voted on about half of those amendments before the session was adjourned.

Removing provision
Smith, the Judiciary Committee chairman, said January 13 that he would remove a provision that would require internet-service providers, when ordered by a court, to block access to non-US websites offering pirated content.

Senator Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat who leads the Senate Judiciary Committee, said January 12 that he's willing to consider dropping a similar provision from the bill he sponsored. Opponents say such website-blocking may harm the stability of the internet's domain-name system.

The Senate measure cleared Leahy's committee in May and awaits consideration by the full chamber.

The Senate bill is S. 968 and the House bill is H.R. 3261.
Krow
Krow #38
Jan 18, 2012 at 11:15 PM
@Vyom I was just informing that ABP blocks the blackout. :)
Neuron
Neuron #39
Jan 18, 2012 at 11:23 PM
and it was nice of them to do it that way. :smile:
Prime_Coder
Jan 19, 2012 at 1:08 AM
I love the way wikipedia has handled the blackout. Not by shutting down the servers. They redirect it after a few seconds. I think it would have a greater effect. The sudden transition to black screen could be shocking to some who are not aware for the protests.

Wait till the people behind this hideous law, are faced with the questions of their children, about why Wikipedia is not working as it always do! Let them answer their sons and daughters about how Wikipedia 'break the law' by sharing information from the users all around the world! :-x

This reminds me the story of Dandi March by M.K. Gandhi.
Zangetsu
Zangetsu #41
Jan 19, 2012 at 9:38 AM
Without disabling javascript users just have to stop loading is the page manually before it could complete to stop that redirection.

yeah I did that yesterday...but its a good initiative by Wiki :-D
Vyom
Vyom #42
Jan 19, 2012 at 11:03 AM
Its not an initiative, rather a participation. Granted its huge compared to what other sites like wired or vimeo has done with flashing just a subtle message on their home pages, compared to full blackout by wikipedia and XDA.
These sites have just earned more trust than ever before.

Respect. :thumbup:
asingh
asingh #43
Jan 19, 2012 at 11:42 AM
I doubt the Black outs will help. It is driven by lobbyists, and they have the funding of American companies. Sad.
Liverpool_fan
Jan 19, 2012 at 8:10 PM
I doubt the Black outs will help. It is driven by lobbyists, and they have the funding of American companies. Sad.

Seems to help.
PIPA support collapses, with 13 new Senators opposed
Vyom
Vyom #45
Jan 19, 2012 at 8:14 PM
^^ Good news.
The makers of such draconian laws have yet to estimate the power of social networking today. Or I hope they already have.